FranklyHR_blog_Header (1)

 

Ask an HR Expert


What Should I Do If a Third Party Claims My Employee Was Sexually Assaulted at Work?

Here is a situation demonstrating the importance of slowing down, gathering facts, and not reacting emotionally to serious allegations. Situations involving alleged harassment or assault can feel urgent and alarming, but an employer’s response must still be structured, neutral, and evidence-based.

Stacy worked the afternoon shift at Tasty Shakes, a busy quick-service restaurant with a mostly young staff. By all accounts, she got along well with her coworkers, including Adam, a line cook she often worked alongside. One Monday morning, the store manager (Darlene) received an angry phone call—not from Stacy, but from her boyfriend, Steve. He alleged Adam had sexually harassed and assaulted Stacy at work, claimed Adam forced Stacy to kiss him, grabbed her breasts, and made her touch his private area. Steve demanded that Adam be fired immediately and threatened to “go public” if he wasn’t fired.
 
The manager’s first instinct was panic – a coworker sexually assaulted an employee while at work! The allegations were serious and graphic. Several supervisors suggested simply terminating Adam “to be safe” and to avoid potential liability. But instead of reacting, the manager followed protocol and opened an investigation. Stacy was interviewed first. She appeared uncomfortable and said very little, only stating that her memory was “foggy” from the “trauma,” and she couldn’t really remember details.

When Adam was interviewed, he did not deny the physical contact. In fact, he acknowledged that they had kissed and touched on several occasions when the restaurant was slow. However, he firmly stated it was mutual and consensual.

Darlene then reviewed the restaurant's camera footage. She saw Adam and Stacy kissing and embracing each other on several occasions throughout their shift. There were times when Stacy pulled Adam away from the view of other coworkers and put her arms around his neck. Another instance showed Adam lifting Stacy up and kissing her. There was not one of the myriad displays of affection where it looked like Adam forced himself on Stacy, or that Stacy was upset or uncomfortable with what they were doing. Darlene thought, “What is going on here?”

The next day, Adam asked to talk with Darlene, then provided something unexpected: the text messages Stacy had sent over the weekend. In the messages, she warned him that Steve planned to report him to management for forcing himself on her and wrote she was “sorry” and he would “probably lose [his] job.” The tone suggested regret about the complaint, not fear or distress about an assault. The texts did not align with the narrative Steve or Stacy claimed.

Adam then provided other messages with Stacy where he asked her why this was happening and reminded her that he had asked her several times if it was okay if they were doing this because she had a boyfriend. She said she was feeling guilty, so she “came clean” to her boyfriend and again apologized; he was probably going to lose his job.

Darlene then interviewed Stacy again. When confronted with the text messages and camera footage, Stacy admitted the physical contact was consensual, and when she told her boyfriend she kissed a coworker, the story got out of hand and led to her boyfriend making the complaint that Adam forced himself on her.

Darlene concluded the serious assault allegations were not substantiated. In the end, both employees were terminated for violating the company’s policy on inappropriate relationships in the workplace.

This situation underscores several critical lessons for employers:

  1. Complaints may come from third parties who do not have firsthand knowledge of what occurred. Whether the complainant is an employee or not, allegations of misconduct must be investigated.

  2. Even highly emotional or threatening demands for immediate action cannot replace a fair investigation.

  3. The accused employee must always be given an opportunity to respond.
 
The takeaway is simple but essential: treat every allegation seriously, but do not treat every allegation as proven. Investigate promptly, remain neutral, document thoroughly, and base decisions on facts – not fear or outside pressure. A disciplined approach protects your employees, your culture, and your organization just as much as it protects your legal exposure.
 
 

Previous Updates

 


Are Salary Ranges Required In General Hiring Flyers (Not A Job Posting)?

Although the laws vary somewhat from state to state, pay transparency requirements typically apply only to job postings  that is, advertisements for a specific position that describe desired qualifications and invite candidates to apply. General "Help Wanted" signs, flyers, or similar postings that do not reference a specific position are typically not considered job postings and thus would not be required to include a pay range. But if a hiring flyer does advertise a specific position and invite candidates to apply, it would likely meet the definition of a job posting and would be required to include a pay range in a state with a pay transparency law.
 
As of January 2026, laws requiring employers to share pay information with job applicants are in effect in 15 states, the District of Columbia, and a number of localities. But pay transparency laws are far from uniform; they vary in key details such as applicability, required information, recordkeeping, and more. These state-to-state differences create challenges for employers, particularly for multistate employers hiring broadly.
 
For guidance on pay transparency laws, you can reach out to your FrankAdvice HR Consultant.
 

 


How Should I Handle A Non-Employee Who Breaks Workplace Policies?

Dirt Delivery, Inc. has been in the gardening business for 10 years. It’s a family-owned and operated business with a clear policy about workplace conduct. All 100+ employees receive a handbook clearly stating the following:

Workplace Conduct
"Dirt Delivery Inc. believes in creating a working environment conducive to achieving our work-related goals. Dirt Delivery also believes in creating a working environment where all employees feel welcome, and no one is subjected to harassment or discrimination. For this reason, Dirt Delivery strictly prohibits the use of any vulgar language, language intended to isolate any individual employee, and proselytizing at work."

The Mystery Dirt Delivery has a small break room that doubles as a conference room, with a chalkboard and table for meetings. On any given day, 20–30 employees use the break room, but lately they have started complaining that the chalkboard is covered with Bible verses. Rachel, the company’s operations manager, removed the verses immediately and placed a copy of the company’s workplace conduct policy directly on the chalkboard.

The Verses Keep Appearing Despite her actions, the Bible verses kept reappearing, and the company’s policy kept ending up on the ground. More employees complained, and everyone Rachel questioned denied writing on the board. Rachel worked late one evening that week and swung by the break room for a drink.
The Surprising Scribe As Rachel walked up, she saw the night janitor enter the break room, grab a piece of chalk, and begin writing verses on the board. Rachel was furious. The janitor didn’t even work for Dirt Delivery. He worked for the cleaning service Dirt Delivery hired.

A Request Rebuffed Rachel called the cleaning company and calmly explained the situation and the company’s policy. She mentioned the complaints she’d received and asked the president of the cleaning company to tell his employee to stop writing on the chalkboard. Much to her disbelief, the president of their company told her that he refused to tell the janitor to stop.

A Call for Help Rachel reached out for professional advice. She had an obligation to enforce Dirt Delivery’s policy and to protect her employees. If the culprit had been one of her employees, she would have known what to do. But the janitor wasn’t her employee. Could she talk with him directly and ask him to stop? Could Dirt Delivery be held liable for harassment if the culprit wasn’t even a company employee?

Advice Dirt Delivery is obligated to address the employees’ complaints and provide a harassment-free workplace. The cleaning company must tell its employee to stop writing on the chalkboard, and if it won’t, Dirt Delivery should hire another cleaning company. Dirt Delivery must protect its employees from third parties, including contractors, vendors, and clients. If it fails in its obligations, it’s at risk of facing claims such as hostile work environment and failure to prevent harassment. Reach out to your FrankAdvice HR Consultant for professional guidance with tricky employee issues and assistance with HR policies. 


Oh, No! What Should I Do Now That I Hired a Registered Sex Offender?

As an employer, you do your best when making a hiring decision. Sometimes, though, new information comes to light after an employee has been with the company for a while. What if you suddenly learned that one of your new hires was a registered sex offender? Would you terminate that person based on what you learned? More importantly, could you do so legally? Let’s look at the following example.

Mike has worked for the ABC Accounting Firm for two months doing maintenance at night. Since day one, he’s done an outstanding job and has performed all his duties without issue.
 
When one of the firm’s managing partners learned that Mike was a registered sex offender, he shared that information with the other partners in the firm. The partners agreed they did not want someone “like that” working for their company. They promptly informed the Office Manager, Julie, and instructed her to terminate him.

As unsettling as this new information was, Julie felt she didn’t have grounds to terminate Mike. But she also believed she needed guidance from an HR professional before bringing the subject to the partners’ attention.

The HR professional confirmed that Julie’s instincts were correct. Having a criminal conviction is not a protected class under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; however, a blanket policy of discharging or refusing to hire anyone with a criminal conviction is a discriminatory practice because such policies often disproportionately exclude members of certain racial or ethnic groups. (See EEOC Enforcement Guidance on the Consideration of Arrest and Conviction Records.)

If an employer wants to take an adverse employment action (e.g., terminating or refusing to hire) based on a person’s criminal history, the employer must engage in a balancing test to determine if the action is “job related” and “consistent with business necessity.” There are three factors that an employer must consider:
 
  1. The nature and gravity of the offense or conduct. The EEOC states that the nature of the offense or conduct may be assessed by looking at the harm caused by the crime (for example, theft causes property loss). The legal elements of a crime also may be instructive. A conviction for felony theft may involve deception, threat, or intimidation. And with respect to the gravity of the crime, a misdemeanor is generally less severe than a felony.

  2. The time that has passed since the offense, conduct, and/or completion of the sentence. In considering the time that has passed, there is no bright-line rule that the EEOC gives. However, the more time that has passed since a conviction, the less relevant it probably is versus a conviction in the recent past.

  3. The nature of the job held or sought. In considering the nature of the job sought, an
    employer cannot rely just on a job title. The employer must look at the essential duties of the job (e.g., data entry, lifting boxes), the circumstances under which the job is performed (e.g., the level of supervision, oversight, and interaction with co-workers or vulnerable individuals), and the environment in which the job's duties are performed (e.g., outdoors, in a warehouse, in a private home).
 
The purpose of this balancing test is to link the criminal conduct to the essential functions of the position. A stronger link will demonstrate that the employer’s decision to terminate or not hire is job-related and consistent with business necessity. The EEOC’s guidance gives several examples that employers may find helpful when determining if denying employment due to a criminal history is job related and consistent with business necessity.

On occasion, these factors may support denying an applicant employment without further evaluation. However, often, this is not the case and employers should err on the side of caution and conduct an “individualized assessment.”

An individual assessment means the employer talks with the employee and provides them an opportunity to explain the circumstances of the conviction and why it should not preclude them from employment. There are several factors the employer should consider when doing an individualized assessment:
 
  1. The facts or circumstances surrounding the offense or conduct.
  2. The number of offenses for which the individual was convicted.
  3. Age when convicted, or released from prison.
  4. Evidence that the individual performed the same type of work, post-conviction, with the same or a different employer, with no known incidents of criminal conduct.
  5. The length and consistency of employment history before and after the offense or conduct.
  6. Rehabilitation efforts (i.e., education/training).
  7. Employment or character references and any other information regarding fitness for the particular position.
  8. Whether the individual is bonded under a federal, state, or local bonding program.
 
If an employee refuses to cooperate with an employer’s inquiries, a decision may be made without any additional information. As with all HR matters, employers should maintain documentation of all conversations with employees to support their decision.

Getting back to ABC Accounting Firm and Mike’s situation – since Mike’s criminal background was not impacting his ability to perform his job and not putting employees or customers at risk, he shouldn’t be terminated. A key factor in the decision was his status as an after-hours employee who also worked in isolation – he was never with any other person. Terminating him solely for being a registered sex offender could lead to a wrongful termination claim.

Julie met with the partners and explained why they should not terminate Mike. While the situation still made the partners uneasy, they understood and accepted Julie’s recommendation.

If you have an applicant or employee with a criminal history, you can reach out to consult on the situation with your FrankAdvice HR Consultant.
 

What Are Some Change Management Best Practices for Employers?

Change management is a structured approach to transitioning from a current state to a desired future state. Organizational change is an inescapable reality, yet most transitions are poorly executed. When change is mishandled, the primary victims are the employees, resulting in a spike in both workload and stress. The problem is often compounded by management's failure to adjust existing duties to accommodate the time needed for learning and adjusting to the new process. This expectation to adapt under duress creates an immediate barrier to success. When employees are already feeling overwhelmed and unsupported, they simply can't absorb all the shifts leaders expect them to make.
 
To move beyond simply implementing change to embedding it successfully and sustainably, employers must champion change management best practices. These practices are centered on acknowledging the human impact of transition, addressing employee concerns head-on, and fostering a sense of inclusion. By prioritizing effective communication, providing the necessary support and time for adjustment, and genuinely involving employees in the process, organizations can mitigate the negative fallout of stress and failed adoption, turning necessary organizational evolution into a collaborative, successful endeavor.
 
The Three Vital Phases of Change Management
 
While many models exist, a successful change management approach is consistently structured around three vital phases: Preparing for Change, Managing the Change, and Sustaining the Change. These phases help ensure that the transition is not just initiated, but deeply embraced and sustained by the people involved.
 
Phase 1: Preparing for Change
 
This initial phase lays the crucial foundation for the transformation. It involves defining the "why" and assessing readiness.
 
  • Assess the Current State: Identify who will be impacted by the change and how they will be affected. This includes evaluating the organizational culture and the level of change readiness to proactively identify potential resistance points.
  • Define and Communicate the Future Vision: Establish clear, measurable objectives (strategic goals and KPIs) and a compelling vision for the future state. This vision must be effectively and transparently communicated to create a sense of urgency and answer the critical employee question: "What's in it for me?"
  • Develop a Strategy: Determine the approach, secure executive sponsorship, and select the appropriate change management team.
 
Phase 2: Managing the Change
 
This is the phase where the plans are put into action to help people transition from the old way of working to the new.
 
  • Communicate and Engage: Implement a detailed communication plan that goes beyond announcements to include two-way dialogue. Involve stakeholders and create a network of Change Champions to help drive adoption at the team level.
  • Empower and Equip: Provide the necessary training and resources to build the new skills and knowledge required. Managers must be coached to act as effective change leaders, capable of supporting their teams and addressing concerns.
  • Remove Barriers: Actively identify, manage, and mitigate resistance to change. Clear the organizational and systemic roadblocks—be they procedural, technological, or cultural—that slow down progress.
 
Phase 3: Sustaining the Change
 
Often neglected, this final phase is essential for preventing a relapse into the old ways of working and helping to ensure the change becomes permanently embedded in the organizational culture.
 
  • Reinforce and Monitor: Establish metrics (KPIs) to continuously monitor buy-in and progress, not just project completion. Gather feedback to identify and address knowledge or skill gaps that emerge after go-live.
  • Celebrate Successes: Recognize and reward individuals and teams for demonstrating the new behaviors and achieving short-term wins. This reinforces the positive outcomes of the change.
  • Transfer Ownership: Ensure the change is institutionalized by updating policies, procedures, job descriptions, and compensation/reward systems. The ownership of the new process or system must be officially transferred to the operational teams to aid with long-term sustainment.
 

Can Employers Require Employees To Speak Only English During Work Hours?

Employees often speak in their native languages to communicate with each other. Title VII permits employers to adopt English-only rules under certain circumstances. Having an English-only rule outside of these limited circumstances provides employees with a basis on which to allege discrimination. Indeed, a rule requiring employees to speak only English while at work is presumed to violate Title VII as it is considered a burdensome term and condition of employment that may create an atmosphere of inferiority, isolation, and intimidation based on national origin.

However, an English-only rule applied only at certain times may be permissible if the employer can demonstrate the rule is justified by business necessity. Business necessity means there is an overriding legitimate business purpose, such as ensuring safety or promoting efficiency. Employers must also notify employees of the circumstances under which the rule applies and the consequences of violating it. Failure to provide such notice may result in the rule being considered evidence of national origin discrimination.

Employers considering such policies must carefully evaluate whether less discriminatory alternatives could achieve the same business objectives.

 


What Are Some Key Performance Indicators Relating To Flexible Work?

How does leadership know whether flexible work is helping or harming their workforce? The answer is anything but singular. Flexible work is a practice that impacts several dimensions of an organization's work.
 
To measure flexible work's impact on the organization, employers must determine which metrics to monitor and how to best collect data and insights to act on. To do this, employers should be aware of which key performance indicators (KPIs) matter most for their flexible work program and their organization.
 
This article discusses KPIs that leaders can monitor to determine whether their flexible work program is successful.
 
Key Performance Indicators
 
Key performance indicators (KPIs) are metrics used by leaders to objectively measure an organization's success. For flexible work, the following KPIs will help an organization determine whether a flexible work program is achieving desired results:
 
  • Cost efficiency;
  • Engagement;
  • Performance;
  • Recruitment success; and
 
Cost efficiency
 
Flexible work has considerably shifted where organizations allocate funds for operating costs. While some costs have been drastically reduced, others have increased. For example, while employers report significant savings in office rent and reduced turnover, many employers increased spending on cybersecurity and collaboration software.
 
It is crucial that employers be vigilant of where they are winning and losing efficiencies in flexible work. Budget changes are likely to occur in:
 
  • Collaboration technology;
  • Cost per hire;
  • Cybersecurity;
  • Home office costs;
  • Office space overhead;
  • State law compliance efforts;
  • Taxes; and
  • Total rewards.
 
Engagement
 
In a flexible environment, employers must ensure that employees feel connected to their organization and dedicated to its mission. When successful, flexibility acts as a vehicle for improving employee engagement by creating a work culture that celebrates flexibility and an environment that fits employee needs.
 
Employers can measure flexibility's impact on engagement by correlating flexibility use rates with:
 
  • Employee engagement survey results;
  • Employee performance metrics;
  • Employee net promoter scores (NPS);
  • Employer reviews (e.g., Glassdoor); and
  • Retention and turnover metrics.
 
Performance
 
Employers make significant investments in flexibility to secure top talent and improve engagement with the goal of maximizing employee performance. Flexibility's impact on performance outcomes can best be measured by evaluating priority work outcomes.
 
Helpful performance metrics to monitor include:
 
  • Customer feedback;
  • Employee efficiency;
  • Goals and objectives achieved (e.g., sales goals);
  • Peer and manager evaluations;
  • Performance review outcomes; and
  • Quality of work.
 
Recruitment Success
 
Recruiting top talent is one of the main strategic advantages of flexible work. Most employers have implemented flexible work to improve recruitment success.
Recruitment metrics to watch include:
 
  • Applicant pool quality;
  • Average time to fill vacancies;
  • Candidate call-back rate;
  • Cost per hire;
  • Successful hire rate; and
  • Total applications.
 
Retention and Turnover
 
Workplace flexibility is a critical driver of retention. Successful flexibility initiatives should decrease turnover for employees who receive it. Important turnover metrics to track include:
 
  • Average length of service;
  • Attrition rate;
  • Cost per hire; and
  • Failure rate of new hires.
 
Methods: Measuring Success
 
Once an organization has prioritized which KPIs to measure, it must apply methods that will provide stakeholders with the data and insights necessary to understand whether their flexible work strategy is successful.
 
Organizations have established numerous methods to measure organizational performance. The following methods are often used to gain insight into, specifically, flexible work performance:
 
  • Employee surveys;
  • Performance management;
  • People analytics;
  • Comparative data (i.e., benchmarking); and
  • Employee monitoring data.
 
Employers must decide which methods work best to gather the information they need to reach their flexible work goals. This will depend on the organization's approach to flexibility and how it is applied.
 
Evolving Flexibility
 
Flexible work has disrupted traditional approaches to work, which have remained relatively stagnant since the 1950s - a time when everything about work, down to the office temperature, was designed for a much more homogonous workforce.
 
Flexible work will only continue to push the boundaries of when, where and how we work. Organizations will continue to create new ways to collaborate, innovate, and connect from anywhere at any time. They will adopt new practices to maximize productivity and enjoy the benefits of a more diverse and more innovative workforce.
 
Though flexible practices have reached levels of normalcy, they are far from done evolving. Organizations should continue to monitor their flexible work practices and remain open to new approaches and growth.

 


How Can I Establish Unpaid Meal Breaks?

Employers that wish to provide unpaid meal breaks must follow these steps. Otherwise, employees must be paid for any time spent in meal breaks.
 
Step 1: Check State Requirements
 
Many states require employers to offer employees paid meal breaks. Employers must first consult state requirements before establishing unpaid meal breaks.
 
Step 2: Ensure That Meal Breaks Are at Least 30 Uninterrupted Minutes
 
If meal breaks are any shorter than 30 uninterrupted minutes, they must count as paid hours worked.
 
Step 3: Relieve Employees of All Duties
 
If employees perform even light duties like answering phones or keeping an eye on valuable equipment, their meal breaks will count as compensable hours worked.
 
Step 4: Allow Employees to Move About the Premises
 
An office employee who is required to eat at his or her desk or a factory worker who is required to be at his or her machine is working while eating. However, it is not necessary that an employee be permitted to leave the premises if he or she is otherwise completely freed from duties during the meal period.
 
Step 5: Memorialize the Unpaid Meal Breaks in a Policy
 
Employers should establish a formal policy that meal breaks will be at least 30 uninterrupted minutes, that employees will be relieved of all duties, and that employees are allowed to move about the premises.
 
Step 6: Enforce the Policy
 
It is not enough just to put a meal break policy in place; employers also must be sure that the policy is followed. Managers should be trained in the particulars of the policy. Employees should be monitored to be sure they are not performing any work during breaks. And employers should respond quickly to any reports of employees not following the policy.
 
Reach out to your FrankAdvice HR Consultant for assistance with a policy or to consult on meal break laws that are applicable to you.

What is Disability Pride?

Disability Pride began as a day of celebration when the Americans With Disabilities (ADA) was signed into law on July 26, 1990. The first official Disability Pride Month was in July 2015 for the 25th anniversary of the ADA. Disability Pride Month is celebrated annually each year in July. This year marks the 35th anniversary of the ADA!
 
Flag for Disability Pride
Flags symbolize solidarity, pride, and acceptance. In 2019, writer Ann Magill, who has cerebral palsy, created the original Disability Pride flag. Magill was motivated to create the flag after a less than pride-filled experience at an ADA anniversary event.
The original flag featured brightly colored zigzagging stripes over a black background. The zig-zag symbolized the barriers people with disabilities face. However, this design caused symptoms in individuals with visually triggered disabilities when viewed on devices.
Following community suggestions, Magill refined the flag: she straightened the stripes, muted the colors, and reordered them to accommodate red-green colorblindness. She showed how our community works together when we face conflicting access needs!
The new flag design is a collaborative effort, representing the community’s unity when addressing challenges. Magill waived her copyright, placing the flag in the public domain for everyone to use and remix.
The diagonal band of six color stripes cut across the barriers separating the disabled from society, representing light and creativity cutting through darkness. Each of the six color stripes hold meaning:
  • Red: physical disabilities.
  • Gold: neurodiversity.
  • White: invisible disabilities and undiagnosed conditions.
  • Blue: emotional and psychiatric disabilities.
  • Green: sensory disabilities, including deafness, blindness, and other sensory disabilities.
  • Faded Black Background: mourning and rage for victims of ableist violence and abuse.
 
SEE FLAG BELOW
 

 


What Can I Do If A Thieving Employee Claims Disability Discrimination?

 
Mark is a clerk at 24-7 Stop & Go, a convenience store where he was hired two months ago. Carla, the general manager, was counting his drawer after his shift and discovered the drawer was $80 short. Carla suspended Mark pending the outcome of an investigation into the shortage, which would be conducted by another manager, Phil.

Phil reviewed surveillance footage of the day in question. He didn’t see anyone pocket money from the drawer; however, he did see Mark taking a few scratcher lotto tickets without ringing them up and playing them right there on the counter. This prompted Phil to look at footage from more of Mark’s shifts. He was seen doing the same thing! Mark also helped himself to some energy drinks and chips while he was at it. Although Phil couldn’t determine why the drawer was $80 short, it was established that Mark never paid for any of the items he took. Phil showed Carla the footage of Mark stealing scratchers, drinks, and food.

Carla messaged Mark so they could discuss the investigation and close it out. Mark messaged back asking if Phil conducted the investigation because he feels Phil is discriminating against him because of his knee injury. 

Carla is taken aback. Knee injury? Discrimination?? Mark has never mentioned an issue with his knee or needing an accommodation, never told her he felt discriminated or retaliated against. Carla doesn’t know how to respond to Mark’s message, so she reached out for HR guidance.

Carla confirms that yes, Phil conducted the investigation into the drawer shortage; however, Carla looked at the surveillance footage too, and Mark is clearly on camera taking scratchers, drinks, and food without paying for them. Carla confirms they have a zero-tolerance policy for theft and that is communicated to employees and consistently enforced. Carla also confirms Mark, hired just two months ago, has never mentioned to her, Phil, or any other manager/supervisor, that he has a knee injury. He has never hinted at needing an accommodation either. For all intents and purposes, it appears this is a case of an employee knowing they are going to get terminated so they claim discrimination in the hopes of not being fired.

In this situation, because 24-7 Stop & Go has clear video footage of Mark stealing, they can still terminate him for theft despite the red flag of a recent discrimination complaint. However, employers are required to investigate all allegations of discrimination, even if they believe the allegations have no merit and are not made in good faith (the same goes for harassment and retaliation too!). Carla was advised to talk with Mark to get a statement about the alleged discrimination.

What Should I Consider If I Think My Employee Has A Disability?

 
Too many employers jump to conclusions, make assumptions, or just ignore the possibility that something must be done about an employee’s possible disability. Don’t make this mistake – the consequences can be costly!

And while the Americans with Disabilities Act applies to employers with 15 or more employees, many state laws have the same protections (or greater!) and apply to all employers.

If you think you may have an employee with a disability, ask yourself these questions:
 
Does my employee have a disability?

Disability is broadly defined and easily established. It includes individuals with physical or mental impairments that substantially limit one or more major life activities. If an employee is claiming to have a disability, either accept the employee’s claim or have the disability certified by a doctor.
 
Am I required to accommodate my disabled employee?

Employers must provide a reasonable accommodation to enable the disabled employee. A reasonable accommodation is any change in the work environment or in the way things are customarily done that enable an individual with a disability to enjoy equal employment opportunities and/or to perform the essential functions of the job.
 
How do I accommodate my employee?

Employers must engage in the interactive process with the employee. The purpose of this conversation is to gather disability-related information and explore possible accommodations. The entire process is ongoing even after an accommodation has been selected and should be documented throughout the process.

Am I required to consider a leave of absence an accommodation?
 
A leave of absence can be an accommodation under the ADA if there is not another option available that would enable the employee to continue working. This is true even if the employer does not offer leave to other employees or the employee has used up all available state and federal leave.
 
Could my employee return to work with restrictions?
 
Employment policies that require employees to be 100% healthy without restrictions before returning to work are a violation of the ADA. If an employee has work restrictions, engage in the interactive process to determine if there is a reasonable accommodation you can provide.
 
Have an employment issue but not sure how to handle it? Reach out to your HR Consultant for practical guidance on how to best solve an employment situation.

How Can I Improve Getting Voluntary Terminations Right?

 
Although all employers encounter voluntary terminations, managing them is not always a snap. Below are some questions; chances are you have some of the same ones.
 
Working Through vs Paying for Notice Periods

Q: When an employee provides formal notice of resignation, can we separate them early
 
A: Yes.
 
No law requires employees to provide notice of voluntary termination; doing so is merely a custom or courtesy. That's because most states are generally considered to be at-will employment states, which means that either the employer or employee may terminate the employment relationship at any time and for any reason, unless a written employment contract or collective bargaining agreement says otherwise.
 
While notice periods allow employers to organize the details of the termination, having the employee hang around until their notice period is up can create problems. The employee may slack off at work or drag down the morale of employees who are staying. As a result, employers may pay employees for the full notice period and have them leave early.
 
But paying an employee for their full notice period isn't the end of the story. There are two other scenarios that must be considered: whether you offer the employee the option to leave early, and they voluntarily accept this option; or whether you require the employee to terminate earlier than the full period provided in their resignation notice.
 
Let's look at both scenarios:
 
  • If you offer the employee the option to leave early and they voluntarily accept, then the separation from employment is considered voluntary. State final pay laws will determine whether you are required to pay the employee for the full notice period.

  • If you require the employee to leave earlier than the end of their full notice period, then, also depending on state law, you may be converting a voluntary resignation into an involuntary termination. In that case, the employee can be eligible for unemployment benefits, which may raise the employer’s unemployment insurance tax rate for the next year.
 
When Final Wages Must Be Paid
 
Q: If an employee terminates voluntarily, can we pay their final wages on the next regular payday?
 
A: It depends.
 
For the timing of final pay, many state wage payment laws distinguish between voluntary and involuntary terminations and allow employers to pay final wages to an employee who terminates voluntarily on the next regular payday. Localities may have different rules.
But there are exceptions. In California, for example, an employee who gives 72 hours' prior notice of their intention to resign must be paid when they leave. But if they do not give 72 hours' prior notice, the employer may send the final payment by mail if the employee requests it and provides a mailing address.
 
However, if an employer converts an otherwise voluntary termination into an involuntary termination, the final pay laws of many states require immediate payment. Please reach out as soon as possible to your payroll contact if you require a final paycheck before next regular payday.
 
As we said, terminations can be complicated. The Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requires nonexempt employees to be paid for all hours worked. On the other hand, exempt employees must be paid a guaranteed weekly salary in any week they do any work, but you can prorate their salary for the first and last weeks in which they worked.
 
The FLSA also requires employers to keep detailed records of nonexempt employees' working time, including the:
 
  • Time and day of the week when their workweek begins;
  • Hours worked each day;
  • Total hours worked in each workweek;
  • Total wages paid each pay period; and
  • Date of payment and the pay period covered.
For purposes of final pay and your payroll records, an employee's last day should be recorded as the last day they performed work for you.
 
Accrued Vacation and Other PTO Balances
 
Q: Must we pay out an employee's accrued vacation or other paid time off balance (PTO) balance as part of their final wages?
 
A: Again, it depends. 
 
State wage payment laws define wages for final pay purposes. Most laws allow employers to write their own policies regarding whether accrued vacation or other PTO balances will be paid as part of final wages. The payment of accrued time, for example, could be contingent on employees' giving notice.
 
The following states have exceptions to pay out accrued time regardless of whether the termination is voluntary or involuntary:
 
  • California;
  • Colorado;
  • Maine;
  • Nebraska;
  • North Dakota; and
  • Rhode Island.
 
Dealing with the nuances of terminations can be tricky depending on the applicable state law, its interaction with federal law, and the unique facts of any given situation, especially for multistate employers. If you have questions about termination, reach out to your FrankAdvice HR Consultant.

What Are Some Benefits of Offering Internships?

 
An internship is learning in an organization that allows individuals, often students or recent graduates, to gain work-related experience and/or satisfy requirements for a qualification. It allows the intern to gain hands-on experience in a professional environment and provides opportunities for the intern to develop their skills. An internship is designed to be a temporary experience, during which time the intern gains increased knowledge and educational value.
Offering workplace internships can also provide significant advantages for employers. Here are three key benefits:
 
1. Building a Talent Pipeline
 
Internships allow companies to identify and cultivate potential future employees. This provides a direct path to hiring individuals already familiar with the company's culture and operations. Companies can use the internship period to evaluate the intern’s abilities and cultural fit before making a full-time hiring decision. This can greatly reduce the cost of hiring and the risk of a bad hire. Additionally, research indicates that interns who are later hired demonstrate higher retention rates compared to external hires.
 
2. Infusion of Fresh Perspectives
 
Interns, often students or recent graduates, have fresh perspectives, new ideas, and up-to-date knowledge of the latest trends and technologies. They may ask “why” questions that long-time employees might overlook, which can lead to improvements in company processes and the identification of inefficiencies.
 
3. Increased Support for Projects
 
Interns can provide support to teams by assisting in a variety of ways, freeing up the teams’ time to focus on other creative or advanced endeavors. They can conduct research or assist with the implementation of a project, and their contributions can help improve overall project outcomes. And when a company begins a new initiative, interns can help with the heightened work demands on current employees.
 
Internships represent a synergetic relationship, fostering growth for both the intern and the organization. Offering internships demonstrates a commitment to workforce development, which can enhance a company’s image. In a competitive labor market, internships are not merely a “nice to have,” but a valuable piece of a viable talent strategy.  
 
Reach out to your FrankAdvice HR Consultant for guidance and resources on internship best practices.

Everyone is Depressed Sometimes … Why Should I Have to Provide Reasonable Accommodation for Depression?

 
A-to-Z Resort has an employee, Nancy, with increasingly poor attendance. Nancy seems to be absent more often than she shows up to work. Management wants to terminate her for violating the attendance policy. One day before the termination meeting, Nancy tells Jennifer, the owner, that she is depressed and cannot come into work for the remainder of the week.

This is all too familiar to employers. It may surprise you that an employee suffering from depression may be considered disabled and entitled to reasonable accommodation under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”).
 
How Should Jennifer, the Owner, Proceed?

Nancy indicated she has a medical condition limiting her ability to work. Thus, Nancy has given Jennifer enough information to put the Resort on notice she has a disability AND may be entitled to reasonable accommodation (in this case, a short leave of absence).

At this point, the Resort is required to engage in the interactive process with Nancy to determine a reasonable accommodation. This is accomplished by doing the following:
 
1. Speaking with Nancy About Her Limitations and Discussing Possible Accommodations the Resort Can Offer
 
Nancy stated she is unable to work because of depression. Under the ADA, a short leave of absence can be an appropriate accommodation. While Jennifer is willing to grant Nancy’s request for a leave of absence as an accommodation, Jennifer can ask Nancy to provide her with medical certification from her health care provider that sets forth the specific accommodation requested, and, in the case of a leave of absence, the length of the leave (including an anticipated return date).
 
2. Granting Nancy’s Request for a Leave of Absence
 
After determining a leave of absence will be the accommodation provided, Jennifer should also provide Nancy with all relevant paperwork regarding her leave of absence including, if applicable, an FMLA designation. In addition, Jennifer should also tell Nancy the Resort will require her to provide medical certification before she will be allowed to return to work. This measure is important because the obligation to engage in the interactive process continues after Nancy returns from disability leave and she may have work restrictions that require a discussion about possible reasonable accommodations in the workplace.
 
3. “Touch Base” with Nancy During Her Leave
 
Jennifer should not inundate Nancy with phone calls during her leave. However, it is a good practice to “touch base” with Nancy a few days before the anticipated return to discuss her return.

If Nancy cannot return to work, Jennifer may request additional certification from Nancy’s health care provider and continue the interactive process by discussing an accommodation of additional leave.

If Nancy is able to return to work, Jennifer can remind Nancy of the required return to work certification and, if appropriate, Jennifer should continue the interactive process by discussing possible accommodations Nancy may need when she returns to work.
 
4. Nancy’s Return to Work
 
If Nancy is able to return to work with restrictions, then the Resort must engage in the interactive process with Nancy “in good faith.” This means the Resort must be flexible and address the unique needs of Nancy when determining reasonable accommodations. Depending on the restrictions of a particular employee, a reasonable accommodation could include reassignment, implementing a reduced or modified work schedule, allowing the employee to work from home, etc. There is no standard list from which employers can work. Ingenuity and cooperation can often result in some very creative and inexpensive solutions.

If Nancy is able to return to work without restrictions, then she must be returned to the same or equivalent position. An equivalent position is one that is virtually identical to Nancy’s former position in terms of pay, benefits, and working conditions, including privileges, perquisites, and status. It must involve the same or substantially similar duties and responsibilities, which must entail substantially equivalent skill, effort, responsibility, and authority. In order to avoid possible claims of discrimination when an employee returns to work from medical leave, it is best they be reinstated to their same position.
 
5. Follow Up with Nancy
 
After Nancy is back at work, Jennifer should follow up with Nancy regularly to ensure Nancy’s return to work was “smooth” and Nancy is not facing any retaliation. If Nancy returned to work with restrictions, Jennifer should also verify that the accommodations agreed upon are being provided and are working for Nancy.
 
6. Document, Document, Document
 
Every step of the interactive process should be documented.

Conclusion

Remember, employees do not have to specifically request a “reasonable accommodation.” An employee need only mention a potential disabling limitation to trigger an employer’s duty to engage in the interactive process with the employee to determine if they have a disability that requires accommodation.

Employers must also be aware many states have enacted their own laws providing additional protections to employees with disabilities. While this example focuses on the federal ADA, equivalent state law can apply to smaller employers.
 
Reach out to your FrankAdvice HR Consultant as needed.

Are Office Pools for the Super Bowl or Final Four Permitted?

 
Federal law does not explicitly prohibit workplace gambling, but some federal agencies may prohibit gambling of any kind. Further, some states have laws that address gambling in the workplace. Outside of these parameters, it is up to the employer to decide whether or not to permit office pools for sporting events. Some employers may choose to ban gambling entirely. Other employers may choose to allow employees to participate in gambling pools for certain designated events like the Super Bowl or Final Four. In such situations, it is best practice to establish clear rules and guidelines such as the maximum amount of the bet and that gambling activity in connection with office pools should not interfere with an employee's work-related duties and responsibilities. An employer should make sure that the office pool is a casual bet between co-workers and not a mechanism for one employee to profit at the expense of others.
What Are Some of the Top HR Mistakes that Employers Can Make?

Virtually every organization faces certain “common” HR challenges. See four common mistakes that employers can make.
 
1. Terminating or Using Corrective Action on Employees that Engaged in a Protected Activity

Subjecting an employee who has engaged in a “protected activity” to an adverse employment action can be an unlawful employment practice. The meaning of “protected activity” is broadly construed and includes, for example, complaining of unlawful employment practices (e.g., harassment, discrimination, unsafe working conditions), requesting and/or receiving a protected leave of absence (e.g., paid sick leave, FMLA, pregnancy leave, Workers’ Compensation), discussing working conditions (e.g., wages, safety issues) and much more. Likewise, “adverse action” is also defined broadly. Adverse action includes any change to the employee’s conditions of employment (e.g., a different schedule, position, responsibilities, etc.), corrective action, and termination.

Taking an adverse action after an employee engaged in a “protected activity” places your organization at risk for getting sued for unlawful retaliation. To reduce the risk for your organization, you can refrain from taking adverse employment actions against this protected group of employees or, at a minimum, consult with an HR professional or employment attorney before taking any employment action against the employee.


2. Failure to Document Performance Problems and Prior Corrective Action

Organizations often neglect to document performance problems and prior corrective action. Supervisors may talk with employees about performance issues but then the supervisor never documents the conversation. Being able to show the employee was counseled about their issues and there was ample opportunity to improve is critical when it comes time to terminate the employee for poor performance.

Your organization should have a well-documented reason for terminating an employee. Even in “at-will” states, it is always better to have a reason for terminating an employee. Providing the employee with a reason for the termination makes it easier for the employee to understand why they were terminated and hopefully prevents the employee from developing their own “reason,” i.e., they were fired because they are a woman, took baby bonding leave, have a mental health disability, etc.

A well-documented reason is also essential if your organization is sued for wrongful termination. It is not enough to simply state the employee has been routinely counseled about their performance issue – you will need proof. The proof is in the documentation. Your organization needs to stress the importance of documenting discussions involving employee performance. Talk to the employee and document the date and subject of the meeting. Making a simple note of the conversation puts your organization in a far better position than having nothing to support the assertion that this employee had ongoing problems. Remember, it will ultimately be the organization’s burden to show the employee was terminated for a non-discriminatory reason.


3. Failing to Engage in the Interactive Process with Disabled Employees

Employers often believe it’s an employee’s obligation to ask for a workplace accommodation. It’s not; it’s the employer’s. The employee doesn’t have to use any magic words or specifically ask for an “accommodation.” An employee simply saying they’re having a hard time getting to work because of their physical therapy appointment is enough information to trigger the employer’s obligation to engage in the interactive process for a possible schedule accommodation.
 
In many instances, the appropriate accommodation is obvious and therefore it is not necessary to go through a step-by-step process. For example, if an employee who uses a wheelchair requests that his desk be placed on blocks to elevate the desktop above the arms of the wheelchair and the employer complies, an appropriate accommodation has been requested, identified, and provided without the need for a formal process. In some cases, if it is a request for something simple, go ahead and provide it. However, when an accommodation is not obvious, an appropriate accommodation is best determined through a flexible, interactive process. 
An employer’s obligation to engage in the interactive process is triggered as soon as the employer is aware an employee may have a mental or physical impairment that limits their ability to perform their job (in the example above, getting to work on time). When this occurs, the employer must timely, and in good faith, engage with the employee and determine if there is a reasonable accommodation that would enable the employee to perform their essential functions.

The interactive process is where the employer meets with the employee or applicant to discuss possible reasonable accommodations. The employer should be open to the employee’s or applicant’s suggestions. During the conversation (or several conversations), the employer and employee exchange information about the employee’s limitations and work restrictions; identify appropriate accommodation(s) that will enable the employee to perform the essential functions of the position; and reach a mutually satisfactory accommodation to be provided.

Much of the time the employer may request medical certification to support the need for an accommodation. However, the employer should never ask the employee what their medical diagnosis is. Employers are prohibited from asking this, and it is never relevant. What is relevant is the employee’s limitations and work restrictions, which are separate from a diagnosis.

Be sure to document all efforts to engage in the interactive process with the employee. This includes all conversations the employer has with the employee when trying to determine a reasonable accommodation; all attempts the employer has made to engage in the interactive process with the employee where the employee has been uncooperative and/or non-responsive; and all accommodations offered and/or provided to the employee.


4. Failing to Correctly Pay Overtime

Federal law and most state laws require employees receive overtime pay for hours worked in excess of the statutory minimum. Two common mistakes occur in regards to overtime pay: (1) employers fail to accurately track employees’ hours worked; and (2) employers misclassify employees as exempt from overtime pay. Failing to correctly pay overtime will result in significant penalties and fines for the employer.

It is the employer’s burden to track employee hours worked and to document those hours. Make sure you have clear policies on getting supervisor pre-approval for overtime hours and documenting hours worked. Likewise, make sure your organization has a clear and accurate understanding of the law governing overtime in your particular state. Some states, such as California, have very strict rules for calculating overtime pay. Conduct an audit of your employees and make sure they are properly classified as exempt or non-exempt (simply calling someone a manager and giving them a salary doesn’t mean they’re exempt from overtime!). If you find you have misclassified an employee, contact an employment lawyer or HR consultant for advice on how to correct the error.
 
Think you may be guilty of one or more of the above mistakes? Reach out to your FrankAdvice HR Consultant for guidance on getting you back on track!

How Can an Employer Get an Employee to Stop Wasting Time and Get to Work?

An employer should create policies about internet use, personal calls and personal emails during work hours. Also, expectations about arriving to work on time and not leaving before agreed-upon departure times need to be communicated and upheld. An employer should alert employees of its time theft policies early in the hiring process, emphasize the policies in regular meetings and newsletters, and promptly enforce the policies against those who violate them.
An employer can provide incentives for employees to improve their morale as well as the likelihood that they will finish tasks. An employer should show employees it appreciates their work by commenting to them personally when they do a good job. The employer can also entrust an employee with specific duties and reward him or her when he or she has completed a task.
Supervisors and managers should also make sure to follow the policies themselves to set a standard that the employees will likely wish to follow.
Reach out to your FrankAdvice HR Consultant for guidance and assistance on policies, employee motivation, and other HR best practices.

How Do I Interview a Deaf Applicant?

Would you know what to do if you had an applicant request an American Sign Language (ASL) interpreter for their interview? 
When an employer has an applicant who requests a reasonable accommodation to continue in the recruitment process, the employer is required to provide an accommodation absent an undue hardship. The reasonable accommodation provided does not always have to be the specific one requested by the applicant; however, it must enable the individual to have an equal opportunity to participate in the application process and be considered for the job.
With respect to hearing-impaired applicants, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) states that when an interpreter is requested, the employer’s obligation under the Americans with Disability Act (ADA) is to provide an ASL interpreter as a reasonable accommodation unless it can show an undue hardship.
Interviewing an applicant exclusively through written questions with no real-time engagement or back-and-forth discussion (when this is not part of the usual interview process) does not provide an equal opportunity to participate in the application process. It does not give the individual the opportunity to have personal interaction with the interviewer, engage in dialogue, or the ability to show their personality.
As such, it is recommended you provide the applicant with an ASL interpreter for the interview. You can decide whether to have the interpreter present in person or through a video remote interpreting service.
Employers should keep in mind that they shouldn’t be speculating at the interview stage about what accommodations may be required if the applicant gets the job. The applicant has only requested an interpreter for the interview. This is not sufficient information to determine whether the person needs the same type or degree of accommodation, or even any accommodation at all, for the job. Excluding an individual from the application process based on such speculation is disability discrimination and violates the ADA.

How Can I Handle An Employee Who Is Habitually Late?

Even with a tardiness policy in place, employers and supervisors likely will have to deal with employees who are habitually late. If the employer or supervisors fail to correct the problem, other employees may start to resent a tardy co-worker as well as the employer for not addressing the situation. While employee tardiness is not necessarily a serious offense, it may very quickly become one.
 
Employee tardiness should be addressed by supervisors and management in a serious and professional manner. Supervisors should keep in mind that it is the employee's behavior that needs to be addressed and corrected as otherwise excellent employees may occasionally have tardiness issues.
 
The following steps should be followed by management in dealing with any employee who is habitually late before that employee's tardiness escalates into a larger issue for the employer.
 
Step 1: Develop and Publish a Policy on Tardiness
 
If the employer does not have a tardiness policy, it will be much more difficult to reprimand and/or punish employees for arriving to work late. This tardiness policy should be used to:
 
  • Warn employees of the employer's expectations regarding showing up to work on time;
  • Explain that tardiness is defined as any time that the employee is not ready to work when the shift begins, even if the employee is on the premises;
  • Define tardiness as beginning work 15 minutes or more after a scheduled start time;
  • Outline the corrective action measures that will be imposed for those employees who do not follow the policy; and
  • Establish an individual or department responsible for monitoring and implementing this policy so employees know who to turn to with compliance issues or questions.
Once the policy is implemented, all employees and new hires should be required to read the policy and sign to acknowledge that they have read and understand what it encompasses and consent to its terms. The policy should also be placed in the employee handbook and on the employer's intranet for easy referral if there are any questions about the scope of the policy. If the policy is changed at any time, those changes should be communicated to all employees.
The employer also may want to post the policy in common areas and easily visible locations with a reminder to all employees of the consequences of violating the policy.
 
Step 2: Implement the Policy
 
After the policy has been published and distributed, supervisors should begin implementing and enforcing the policy. Employers should be aware that if the policy is not enforced in a uniform manner, courts are less likely to enforce the policy and uphold it during litigation. When an employee arrives to work late, that arrival should be recorded by the supervisor on duty. If the employer has a corrective action policy in place that details progressive disciplinary measures to be imposed, the first of those measures should be imposed. In general, all instances of employee tardiness should be documented in the employee's file and employers should follow these guidelines:
 
  • Every time the employee arrives late, this should be recorded with the date, the time, and the reasons given for the tardiness.
  • If a supervisor or the employer speaks to the employee, the conversation should also be recorded, as well as any observations of the employer or supervisor.
  • If any corrective action measures are imposed, those should be recorded and, when appropriate, the employee's reaction to those measures.
  • Any performance reviews in which an employee's tardiness is discussed should be documented accordingly.
 
Step 3: Identify Habitually Late Employees
 
Recording late arrivals of all employees also alerts the supervisor as to which employees are arriving to work on time and which employees are habitually late.
 
There are several reasons why an employee might be late for work on a regular basis, which require the supervisor to try to work with the employee to develop a resolution to the problem. In all of these situations, the employer can ask the employee to suggest solutions as the employee is more likely to respond positively if the employee feels as if their feedback is taken into account. Some reasons that an employee might have for being late include the following:
 
  • If the employee is late because of a medical condition, employers have a duty to provide the employee with a reasonable accommodation. The employee should provide the employer with necessary medical documentation that outlines the accommodations needed to accommodate the employee's condition. Once these are determined, it will be easier to work with the employee and create a plan on a going forward basis that will address the employee's tardiness as well as accommodate the employee's particular needs.
  • If an employee is regularly late because of a childcare issue, the supervisor should meet with the employee and try to come up with viable options.
    • Example: The employer or supervisor might allow the employee to come into work late in the mornings and stay later at night.
  • If the employee has a sick relative at home, or another personal reason that makes it difficult for the employee to arrive to work on time, the employer can brainstorm with the employee to determine available alternatives.
    • Example: The supervisor or employer may consider allowing the employee to temporarily work from home a few days every week.
 
Once the employer has identified an employee who is regularly tardy, the supervisor should speak with the employee and explain how habitual employee tardiness is a problem for the employer as it lowers the workplace morale and creates tension between co-workers. The supervisor should make every effort to speak with the employee in a private and discreet manner.
 
Step 4: Impose Corrective Action Measures
 
If the employer or supervisor has spoken to the employee about habitual tardiness and the employee still has not made efforts to improve, the employer will have to impose corrective action measures which may include suspension and even termination. Any corrective action measure that is imposed should be documented. Also, the supervisor should not wait to impose corrective action. The longer that the supervisor waits, the more it will appear to other employees that the supervisor is not actually enforcing the policy or addressing the problem.
The best way to deal with employee tardiness is to signal to employees that supervisors and management take this problem very seriously. Often this can be achieved through strict corrective action measures. To avoid confusion, the employer may want to establish an easy to follow, progressive corrective action policy.
 
Example: "One time that the employee is tardy will result in a verbal warning; a second time will result in a written warning; four times the employee is tardy will result in a suspension; and six or more times will be grounds for termination."
 
Step 5: Recognize a Larger Workplace Problem
 
If the employer realizes that many of its employees are coming into work late, it may be time to take additional measures. This may include conducting training seminars on workplace punctuality, redistributing the policy on tardiness to employees or instituting more severe corrective action measures when appropriate.
 
Supervisors and the employer should lead by example and aim to be punctual at all times. If supervisors are always late, this will send a message to employees that such behavior is acceptable. If a particular situation calls for a supervisor to be late to work, the supervisor should let the employees know in advance in order to plan accordingly and demonstrate that supervisors understand the importance of the tardiness policy.

What Are Captive Audience Meetings?

Captive audience meetings are meetings employees are required to attend in which the employer conveys their opinions on political or religious matters, or states its position about why employees should vote "no" on unionization.  

Employers in Illinois soon will be prohibited from requiring employees to attend or participate in such meetings under the newly passed Worker Freedom of Speech Act.

The Illinois law, effective January 1, 2025, prohibits employers from discharging or otherwise penalizing or taking an adverse employment action against an employee - or threatening to do so - for declining to attend or participate in a meeting or listen to communication from the employer conveying its opinion on political matters. Political matters include matters related to the decision to join or support a labor organization. The law mandates that any employee attendance be strictly voluntary. 

Illinois is the latest in the trend of states passing laws prohibiting captive audience meetings. In the past 12 months, similar laws have been enacted by Connecticut, Hawaii, Maine, Minnesota, Vermont and Washington. The legislation has followed calls by National Labor Relations Board General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo to ban the practice as a violation of employees' free speech rights.

How Can I Fight the Spread of Employee Disengagement?

 

The problem of employee disengagement is increasing in prevalence. Recent data from Gallup found that engagement among US employees has reached an all-time low in 2024, with a ratio of 1.8 engaged workers per every actively disengaged worker.

Disengagement to this degree can drain an organization's productivity and wreak havoc across a range of business outcomes. In fact, the cumulative effects of employee disengagement are estimated to cost up to 9% of the global GDP in lost productivity each year.

At these levels, it is unlikely that any organization is entirely spared from the effects of employee disengagement. However, disengagement can be hard to detect, and even harder to address.

According to a report from McKinsey, disengaged employees most often fall into the "mildly disengaged" category. These employees are not actively disruptive, but their dissatisfaction causes them to underperform or avoid making contributions that go beyond what is required in their job description. Often, this type of disengagement can go unrecognized.

Causes of Disengagement

Because disengagement can fly under the radar, employers should put measures in place to prevent disengagement from developing in the first place. There are various factors that have been connected to employee disengagement.

Although some causes of disengagement are not directly in an employer's control, organizations can still benefit by providing resources that support employees through the stressors they are likely to encounter, such as bereavement or illness.

Employers should recognize that disengagement is not always due to the personal issues of employees. Disengagement is often caused by inefficient processes within the organization itself. On the bright side, this means that employers can control employee disengagement by recognizing its causes and working to prevent them.

How to Increase Engagement

Collecting employee feedback helps employers identify the extent of disengagement and its root causes for targeted intervention. Employers should review each of the areas listed above to make sure that their organization is well-equipped to stave off the most common causes of disengagement before they become a problem. This process may include:

  • Reviewing compensation and benefit practices within the organization and benchmarking the competitiveness against the market;
  • Identifying and addressing issues with company culture and workplace conflict;
  • Identifying and reworking disruptive processes;
  • Reassessing job design and balancing workloads within teams, including potentially hiring additional support for employees with heavy workloads;
  • Training leaders and managers to avoid micromanagement and facilitate employee feedback;
  • Developing adequate reward and recognition systems;
  • Reassessing the measures in place for career growth and professional learning to promote a culture of continuous development, and;
  • Supporting employees experiencing personal issues by providing resources for employee well-being.

Employers that work through each of these areas to align themselves with leading practices will have a much better chance of addressing disengagement effectively or preventing the issue from occurring altogether.


What Are Some Critical Steps to Enhance Company Culture?

A company's culture can be difficult to define. Beyond what is stated in your company's mission, culture takes shape through the norms and values that shape day-to-day practices among employees. Although a set of defined values might help employees understand what is expected of them, a company's culture is determined by more than just what is formally documented.  
 
Culture can have ripple effects on a business, from employee engagement to performance targets. For example, a Gallup survey found that employees who feel connected to their company's culture are 3.7 times more likely to feel engaged at work and 55% less likely to be actively looking for another job.
 
Although leaders often know what their ideal company culture would look like, many struggle to translate this from paper to practice.
 
Define the Ideal Culture
 
An intentional strategy can go a long way toward improving a company's culture. However, for this to be effective, employers should first define the ideal values they would like to see reflected in the company's culture and assess where the company currently stands in relation to them.
 
Companies in different industries might have different priorities for ideal cultural values. For example, a company in the highly competitive tech industry might want to emphasize the importance of creativity and innovation, whereas a healthcare company might prioritize adherence to protocol and emotional intelligence. However, some goals will provide an effective boost to performance in any organization, serving as pillars for a company to thrive.
 
Once an employer decides on the most important values to be prioritized within an organization, they should assess how effectively day-to-day operations and decisions at the organization are aligned with those values. Employers should collect feedback from employees about how well people within the organization are honoring the company's ideal values. The constructive criticism in employee feedback can identify which values are out of alignment and why, which may inform a strategy to intervene and correct cultural issues.
 
Set the Stage for Culture in Hiring
 
Although written guidance for a company's culture may help clarify expectations, the transition from vision to reality depends on whether the people at your company are willing to align their conduct with these values.
 
Employees will often reliably do this without any need for intervention if a company's values are aligned with their personal values. For example, an employee who is already inclined to be compassionate and honest is less likely to undermine similar company values by being callous or dishonest at work.
 
Because of this, there is enormous potential to influence outcomes in a company's culture through the hiring process. When companies train hiring managers to consider a candidate's alignment with company values, these managers are more likely to select candidates that are already inclined to follow those values. This simple step can ensure that new team members reinforce the ideal values of the culture, rather than conflict with them.
 
Companies can also set new hires up for success by ensuring that the onboarding process formally sets the tone for the values they are expected to follow in their work.
 
Lead by Example
 
Leaders play a key role in setting expectations for a company's culture. It is important for leaders to not only prescribe expectations for the values employees must follow, but to reflect these values in their decisions. Companies with leaders that do not live up to core values tend to have worse culture scores.
 
Despite this, not every company is effective at reflecting ideal values through leadership decisions. To avoid cultivating leadership that will fall out of alignment with the ideal company culture, employers should ensure that the leadership development strategy at their company prioritizes leadership skills that align with company values. Selecting leaders predisposed to these values or actively seeking to develop them will keep the company on track.
 
Takeaway
 
To help a company cultivate and preserve the culture it needs to succeed, employers should be intentional with taking measures that set a company's culture up for success. Some of these steps include:
 
  • Defining the ideal characteristics of culture for the company's industry;
  • Soliciting employee feedback to judge the company's alignment with its ideal culture;
  • Training managers to consider the alignment of candidates with company values in the hiring process, and;
  • Emphasizing how company values should guide decision-making in the leadership development process.

How and when should I communicate with my employees about the new DOL overtime rule and how it may impact them?

On April 23, 2024, the U.S. Department of Labor announced a final rule, Defining and Delimiting the Exemptions for Executive, Administrative, Professional, Outside Sales, and Computer Employees, raising the Fair Labor Standards Act’s minimum annual salary threshold for overtime pay eligibility in a two-step process. Starting July 1, 2024, the threshold will increase from $35,568 to $43,888 per year. It will then increase to $58,656 on January 1, 2025.
 
Remember salary (“my employee is salaried”) is how someone is paid; employees are classified as exempt from overtime or non-exempt from overtime (exempt vs. non-exempt status). You can have a salaried non-exempt employee. The new DOL rule is a minimum salary requirement for certain exempt from overtime employees (exempt status).
 
Before reading further in this article, if you have not, be sure to check out last month’s Ask An HR Expert article on What Can I Do Now That The DOL Has Announced Their Final Overtime Rule (accessible at the end of this article under Previous Updates) on first steps to take and coming up with your compensation plan.
 
Now that you have decided which employees will remain exempt status and which will be switched to non-exempt status, let’s look at some considerations, some specific scenarios an employer may encounter, and then look at communication and timing of the communication to affected employees.
 
Effects on Employees

Think through perceptions of fairness and the effect on morale as you prepare to comply with the new regulations. There could be a morale issue for employees who may not get an increase, realize they need to work overtime or will receive less pay. Many workers will view a loss of exempt status as a demotion. Take into account the impression on employees as you communicate changes to pay or classification. Prepare for some difficult conversations. Provide training to newly non-exempt employees about new procedures, as applicable, as well as to managers of employees who are being reclassified. Provide any needed updated job descriptions. And remember, don’t prohibit pay discussions.
 
Notice of Changes
You will want to provide a written communication to each employee about the specific changes to their compensation and what new responsibilities come with the changes, such as timekeeping and meal and rest breaks. Some states require advance notice of wage changes, so you should determine local requirements. Irrespective of state law, you should clearly communicate the new requirements before they take effect.
Here is a chart about pay rate notification requirements by state. PAY CHART
Here is a sample customizable template for informing an employee about a change from exempt to non-exempt status. Note – the template is a sample model and should be modified for your company and to be in compliance with any applicable state laws. SAMPLE TEMPLATE
 
Various Scenarios
 
Here are some scenarios an employer could encounter:
 
A
Scenario: Carlos is an exempt employee and makes $40,000 per year.
Action: After a review of his actual duties, Carlos’ employer decides his job meets the applicable duties test and plans to increase his salary to the new threshold in July, and the later threshold in January to $1,015.20 per week/$52,790.40 per year and pay 10% of his salary as a bonus.
Outcome: Carlos is excited to make more money. His employer accounts for the needed increase in the budget. 
 
B
Scenario: Megan is an exempt employee and makes $47,000 per year. Adrianna is her exempt supervisor and makes $59,000 per year. Their employer is looking at serious salary compression by January 1st with the required increase to Megan’s salary.
Action: After a review, their employer decides to move Megan to the new threshold in January (she is already above the July threshold). Their employer will raise Adrianna’s salary $10,000 at her next annual review in November and pay an annual bonus to help minimize salary compression.                                                                                                                                  Outcome: Megan understands how she will be paid and is good with her increase in base pay. Adrianna is good with her increase in pay and new bonus compensation plan.
 
C
Scenario: Anthony is an exempt employee making $36,000 a year.
Action: After a review of the actual duties being performed, it looks like the job can be done with only an hour or two beyond 40 hours per week. Anthony’s employer decides to make the position non-exempt and continue paying the equivalent range, but at an hourly rate. Even paying an hour or two each week of overtime, it is much less than raising Anthony to the new thresholds.
Outcome: Anthony understands he would be making some extra pay each week, but is disappointed on the impact to his work/life balance. He has never had to punch a time clock and does not want to keep track of his hours worked.
 
D
Scenario: Christina is an exempt employee making $40,000 a year.
Action: After a review of the actual duties being performed, her employer decides to make the position non-exempt and continue paying the equivalent range, but at an hourly rate. Her employer moves one of Christina’s duties to another employee and expects Christina to do the job in 40 hours, without overtime.
Outcome: Because one of her duties was taken away, Christina wonders what her employer thinks of her and what it may mean for her career path. She worries she may not be able to do the job in 40 hours.

Communication Plan
 
Educate employees on the regulatory changes, and why this is happening. Keep it simple and straightforward. If the workplace as a whole needs clarification on the overtime rule and how individuals will be impacted, consider providing an overview of the new rule and how the employer is responding (by conducting an analysis and communicating with affected individuals directly). 
 
Here are some communication plan suggestions:
 
  • Communicate via email, intranet posting, group or individual meetings.
  • Consider using the words “eligible for overtime” or “not eligible for overtime” instead of “exempt” or “non-exempt” for easier understanding.
  • Educate managers as they will probably be the first place employees go with questions. They may also be subject to the change while needing to communicate with others that are impacted.

 

Be sure to advise employees about changing policies as a part of the communication plan. Include new expectations for a newly non-exempt person and train as appropriate. What type of work is authorized outside of regular work hours? How much overtime is authorized? Are employees used to reading and responding to email on the weekend? If so, as a non-exempt employee, that would need to be counted as time worked.
 
Be available and patient with employees during the transition. Treating them with sensitivity and empathy will go a long way. Here are some ways to provide assurance:

 

  • Let employees know they are appreciated. Moving to non-exempt status is a change in how their pay is calculated, not a change in how they’re valued as an employee. You can have a conversation about their value and development opportunities at the time of reclassification to show good faith in their continued value.
  • Assure them that keeping track of their time is a legal requirement. It’s not meant to create the feeling that they are being micromanaged.
  • Clarify that removing duties because of the new rule is not indicative of a lack of confidence in their ability.
  • Explain that by limiting overtime (if that’s the case), employees might be able to leave work on time, which could improve their work-life balance.
  • Let employees know why overtime is needed (if that’s the case) for the success of the company and remind them that if they were exempt, they would not get any additional compensation for the extra hours. Perhaps you may be able to offer flexibility when needed. 

 

Timing of Communication
 
You will want to communicate in advance of the change, remembering any pay change notice requirements necessary by applicable law. Keep in mind there will be some uncertainty with legal challenges to the DOL rule. Currently, a coalition of business groups claims the DOL exceeded its authority by setting the salary threshold too high and requiring automatic increases every three years. The lawsuit has been filed in the same district court in Texas which stopped the 2016 overtime rule from taking effect.
 
Even so it’s important to remember the effective dates for compliance have not been changed or blocked at this time. Complying with the new overtime rule requires careful planning, budgeting, and communications with employees. So, you don’t want to wait and see before you have your strategy to comply by July 1st.
 
For making pay or status changes, contact your Payroll Representative.
 
For questions on the new overtime rule, compensation consulting, or HR guidance, reach out to your FrankAdvice HR Consultant.

What Can I Do Now That The DOL Has Announced Their Final Overtime Rule?

On April 23, 2024, the U.S. Department of Labor announced a final rule, Defining and Delimiting the Exemptions for Executive, Administrative, Professional, Outside Sales, and Computer Employees, raising the Fair Labor Standards Act’s minimum annual salary threshold for overtime pay eligibility in a two-step process. Starting July 1, 2024, the threshold will increase from $35,568 to $43,888 per year. It will then increase to $58,656 on January 1, 2025.
 
Standard salary level:
 
Before July 1, 2024                          $684 per week (equivalent to $35,568 per year)
July 1, 2024                                      $844 per week (equivalent to $43,888 per year)
January 1, 2025                                $1,128 per week (equivalent to $58,656 per year)
 
To qualify for exemption, employees generally must meet certain tests regarding their job duties and be paid on a salary basis at not less than $684* per week (current standard salary level before July 1, 2024). Employers may use nondiscretionary bonuses and incentive payments (including commissions) paid on an annual or more frequent basis, to satisfy up to 10 percent of the standard salary level (not for highly compensated employees as defined).
 
In addition to increases to the standard salary level, the highly compensated employee (HCE) threshold increases from $107,432 to $132,964 per year on July 1st and $151,164 per year on January 1st. The HCE must receive at least the full standard salary level amount per week each pay period on a salary or fee basis without regard to the payment of nondiscretionary bonuses and incentive payments.
 
While the rule is expected to face legal challenges employers should prepare.
 
Next steps employers can take:
 
1. Review the Ask an HR Expert Articles from the February and March FranklyHR newsletters.
 
2. Now that we know the exact dollar thresholds, finalize your identified employees that will be impacted.
 
3. Review the impact. As you crunch numbers for this new rule, consider the following:
 
  • Should salaries be raised to meet the new exempt salary threshold?
  • Should the worker be changed to non-exempt status and overtime worked into the budget? Keep in mind that frequent overtime may increase pay more than if the position remained exempt and the salary increased.
  • Should additional staff be hired to minimize the need for overtime?

 

Part of an employer review of the new DOL rule includes a cost and benefit analysis. Assess employee hours by considering the following:
  • Does the job description accurately reflect the duties, and how many hours does the job take now?
  • Can it be done in 40 hours a week?
  • Can some duties be reassigned if the role changes to non-exempt status?
  • How much overtime may need to be worked if the role is changed to non-exempt?
 
For benefit eligibility and employer contribution determinations, an employer may use exempt or non-exempt status. Keep in mind that an increase in an employee’s salary may increase benefit costs to the employer for premiums such as short and long-term disability or life insurance. Employers should examine any benefits related to exempt or non-exempt status that could affect the cost and effectiveness of that benefit (i.e., PTO/sick/vacation time).
 
4. Determine a compensation plan.
 
Raising the salaries of your exempt employees to meet the new minimum threshold may cause salary compression. Salary compression occurs when an employee’s salary is very close to the pay of those with more experience, skills, or seniority. A common example is when new-hire starting salaries are close to the wages of current workers.
 
Increasing salaries to retain exempt status may require a look at increasing internal salary ranges as a whole. Possibly make a plan for adjustments over time if that is needed. You could also consider using small bonuses to reach the needed salary threshold per the new rule. 
 
As you review the impact, decide which options are preferable and which employees will remain exempt, and which will be switched to non-exempt status.
 
Employers should proceed with caution in terms of actual rollout or implementation and should prepare for uncertainty with the upcoming legal challenges.
 
For questions on the new overtime rule, and for compensation consulting needs, reach out to your FrankAdvice HR Consultant.
 
In an upcoming FranklyHR issue, we will cover figuring out the timing and communication to affected employees.

What Are Workplace Practices of Exempt and Nonexempt Employees?

Following on from our Ask an HR Expert article in last month’s issue of FranklyHR, employers will need to identify employees who may need to be reclassified if the DOL proposed overtime rule takes effect in the coming months.

 

As a refresher, the US Department of Labor (DOL) has proposed raising the minimum salary for most employees exempt from the overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) from $684 per week to a level potentially as high as $1,158 per week. As a result of this change, it is estimated that 3.4 million exempt workers will become eligible for overtime pay.

 

Since the rules under which exempt and nonexempt employees work differ significantly, a newly reclassified employee and their manager will need to adjust certain workplace practices. In certain limited situations, however, the rules for a newly reclassified nonexempt will remain the same.

The following quick reference chart summarizes the areas where a newly reclassified employee's workplace practices must change.

 

 

 

Subject

Exempt employees

Nonexempt employees

Time tracking

An employer is not required to keep track of exempt employees' working time; nevertheless, an employer may require exempt employees to record and track hours.

An employer must keep track of nonexempt employees' working time; it can require nonexempt employees to record and track their hours as part of a Timekeeping Policy.

Basis upon which payment is made

Most exempt employees must receive a guaranteed weekly salary.

Nonexempt employees may continue to be paid on a salary basis or on an hourly basis.

Bonuses and other incentive payments (e.g., commissions)

Exempt employees may earn bonuses or other incentive pay, according to the employer's policy.

An employer must include nondiscretionary bonuses and other incentive pay in nonexempt employees' regular rate when calculating their overtime rate.

Preliminary and postliminary work

Exempt employees may start working before the workday officially begins and may continue to work after the workday ends without receiving any additional pay.

Nonexempt employees must be paid for preliminary and postliminary work (e.g., setting up work stations prior to the start of the workday or stopping on the way home on a work-related errand) if the task is part of their principal activities.

Flex time

Exempt employees may arrange, with the employer's permission, to come in late, leave early, or take time off during the workday, without a corresponding reduction in their pay. Exempt employees may take a full-day personal day or vacation day with a corresponding reduction in pay, or they may use accrued time off.

Nonexempt employees may arrange, with the employer's permission, to come in late or leave early, or take time off in the middle of the workday, and a corresponding deduction may be made from their pay. Nonexempt employees may take a personal day or vacation day with a corresponding reduction in pay or they may use accrued time off.

Sick time

Exempt employees' pay may be deducted for absences of one or more full days due to sickness or disability as long as the deductions are made in accordance with a bona fide plan, policy or practice of providing compensation for salary lost due to illness.

Nonexempt employees may take time off from work if they are sick; the time off may be unpaid or the employee may use accrued time off.

Vacation or personal time

Exempt employees may take one or more full days off for vacation or personal time; the time may be unpaid or the employee may use accrued time off. Vacation or personal time in increments of less than a full day may not be unpaid.

Nonexempt employees may take time off for vacation or personal time in whatever increment of time the employer allows; the time off may be unpaid or the employee may use accrued time off.

Employer-occasioned closings

Exempt employees need not be paid their guaranteed salary if the employer chooses to close the business for one week or longer; the employee may use accrued time off. Exempt employees may have deductions made from their leave banks, or may be required to use an accrued day off, if the employer closes the business for full days or partial days due to the weather or other disasters, provided the employees continue to receive their guaranteed weekly salary. Exempt employees must receive their guaranteed salary if they have no accrued time off to use.

Nonexempt employees need not be paid, regardless of whether the closing is for a week or less than a week; the employee may use accrued time off. Nonexempt employees need not be paid if the employer closes the business for full days or partial days due to the weather or other disasters; they may use accrued time off.

Overtime

Exempt employees may be required to work longer than 40 hours in a week; any cash overtime pay or compensatory time off they earn is at the employer's discretion.

Most nonexempt employees must be paid cash overtime at one and one-half times their regular rate of pay for all hours worked over 40 in a workweek; compensatory time off is not permitted for private-sector employees.

Meal periods

Exempt employees may work through their meal periods, depending on the workload, without becoming entitled to extra pay.

Nonexempt employees must be paid for time spent in meal breaks if they are less than 30 minutes, if they are interrupted or if they perform any productive work.

Rest breaks

Exempt employees may take rest breaks as the work load permits without becoming entitled to extra pay.

Nonexempt employees must be paid for short rest breaks of 20 minutes or less.

Travel time

Exempt employees may travel among job sites during the day without receiving any additional pay. Exempt employees continue to receive their guaranteed weekly salary during any time they are traveling away from home overnight. Exempt employees need not be paid more than their guaranteed weekly salary for travel that is a special one-day assignment (e.g., a workshop conducted off the employer's premises).

Nonexempt employees must be paid for the time they spend traveling among worksites during the workday. Nonexempt employees need not be paid for commuting time. Nonexempt employees who travel away from home overnight must be paid when that travel occurs during their regular working hours, including work hours on nonwork days (e.g., Saturdays and Sundays). Travel time outside of the employees' regular hours is not hours worked and need not be paid for, unless the employee is actually working. Nonexempt employees who are required to travel on a special one-day assignment must be paid for their travel time, less their regular commuting time.

Off-the-clock work

Exempt employees who work off the clock (e.g., by sending or receiving email or making telephone calls or texting during the evening) need not receive any additional pay for those activities.

Nonexempt employees are entitled to be paid for all hours worked, including off-the-clock work that occurs when an employer knows or has reason to believe that the employees are continuing to work beyond their scheduled shift to the employer's benefit, but the employer does not stop the employees from doing so.

Telecommuting

Exempt employees who work at home or away from the employer's premises have a great deal of discretion regarding their work hours; they can work through meal periods and during off hours.

An employer is responsible for accurately tracking the working time of nonexempt employees who work from home, making it important to adopt and enforce a timekeeping policy.

Training time, lectures, meetings

Exempt employees who attend training courses during nonworking time do not need to be paid for that time.

Nonexempt employees must be paid for the time they spend attending most training sessions, lectures or meetings.

Waiting time

Exempt employees may be required to wait on the employer's premises or at the employer's behest for as long as necessary before or during the workday.

Nonexempt employees who are engaged to wait (e.g., their presence benefits the employer) must be paid for the waiting time.

On-call time

Exempt employees who are required to remain on-call need not be paid any additional pay for the on-call time.

Nonexempt employees who are required to remain on call on the employer's premises must be paid for the on-call time. Nonexempt employees who are required to remain on call off the employer's premises generally are not working during the on-call time if they are simply required to inform their employer of where they may be reached. Nonexempt employees who respond to an on-call situation must be paid for their response time.

Volunteer work

Exempt employees may volunteer their time to an employer (e.g., by hosting or participating in a community event in the employer's name) without receiving any additional pay.

Nonexempt employees must be paid for any time spent attending any event on an employer's behalf; nonexempt employees may not volunteer their time to the employer.

How Can I Prepare for the Proposed FLSA Overtime Rule?

The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) published a proposed overtime rule last summer and took comments on the proposed rule until November 7, 2023. More than 30,000 comments were submitted. The DOL is reviewing comments and has targeted April 2024 for the release of a final overtime rule (which would take effect no sooner than 60 days after the release, pending legal challenges).
 
The DOL plans to amend the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) regulations to:
 
  • Increase the minimum annual salary for most exempt employees paid on a salary basis from $35,568 per year to match the 35th percentile of weekly earnings of full-time non-hourly workers in the lowest-wage Census Region (which is projected to be somewhere between $55,068 per year and $60,209 per year);
  • Increase the minimum annual salary for highly compensated employees to match the 85th percentile (which is projected to be around $143,988 per year); and
  • Adjust these minimum salary levels for inflation every three years.
 
An estimated 3.6 million workers who are currently overtime-exempt are projected to become eligible for overtime unless their employers raise their salaries, reorganize workloads, adjust work schedules or spread work hours in order to avoid paying overtime.
 
To prepare for the FLSA overtime rule, an employer should consider beginning work on the following steps.
 
Step 1: Identify Employees Who May Need to Be Reclassified
 
Identify employees who are currently classified as exempt under the executive, administrative, professional, or computer employee exemptions (other than computer employees paid on an hourly basis) and currently earn less than the expected minimum salary. Highly compensated employees should also be identified.
 
Step 2: Determine a New Compensation Plan
 
After identifying affected employees, consider the following options:
 
  • Increase their weekly salary to the new minimum or higher to retain their exempt status; or
  • Reclassify them as nonexempt and:
    • Pay them overtime for any overtime hours worked;
    • Reduce or eliminate overtime hours; or
    • Reduce the amount of pay allocated to base salary (while making sure it remains above the minimum wage) and add pay to account for overtime for hours worked over 40 in the workweek, to hold total weekly pay constant.
 
An employer should weigh not just the labor cost of each option, but also the potential administrative burdens, morale problems and litigation risks that could result from reclassifying exempt employees as nonexempt. An employer can also consider nondiscretionary bonuses and incentive pay, per the 2020 amended overtime rule, to satisfy up to 10% of the standard salary level (but not toward the minimum salary for highly compensated employees) as long as they are paid annually or more frequently.
 
Beware the temptation to reclassify affected workers as independent contractors. Without a significant restructuring of work arrangements, this approach is almost certain to leave the business vulnerable to a misclassification lawsuit. Since multiple workers are likely to be affected by a common policy, plan or design, there is a high potential for a collective action.
 
Step 3: Account for State Differences
 
In addition to the federal FLSA, an employer also must follow the laws of the state and/or locality where work is performed if it provides a greater protection or benefit to the employee. An employer should take these differences into account as it formulates its plans.
 
A few states already require employers to pay overtime-exempt executive, administrative and professional employees a salary higher than the federal salary (or may do so this year after annual inflation adjustments). For employees in these states, the new FLSA rule may be moot if it does not increase the new salary threshold above those existing state-required minimums. Click the link below to view states with higher thresholds as noted in the November issue of FranklyHR:
 
 
Minimum wage is a key difference. For exempt employees who work long hours, it may cost more to reclassify them as nonexempt and pay them overtime than it would to raise their salary and keep the exemption.
 
When reclassifying exempt employees as nonexempt, it's also important to consider state-specific requirements regarding overtime, show-up time/reporting time, meal and rest breaks, and more. 
 
Step 4: Budget for Pay Compression
 
Increasing the salaries of employees earning less than the new minimum salary to preserve their exemption status can put upward pressure on the salaries of those who already earn a little, but not much more than the new minimum salary.

 

An employer should account for this dynamic as it formulates a plan for compliance.

 
Step 5: Review Wage and Hour Policies and Processes
 
In preparation for the new overtime rule, an employer can review and update its internal policies including on overtime, meal and rest breaks, telecommuting and timekeeping.
 
Step 6: Audit Job Descriptions
 
Employees' job descriptions should be carefully reviewed in preparation for the overtime rule.
 
In addition to checking job descriptions for fundamental details like job titles and qualifications, it is crucial to ensure that they:
 
  • Are accurate; and
  • Support the job's exemption classification.
 
These reviews should be conducted regularly regardless of external circumstances, but it will be especially important after reclassifying employees as a result of the new overtime rule.
 
Organizing the list of job duties and responsibilities in an optimal manner (i.e., order of importance, frequency with which tasks are performed or essential versus non-essential duties) can help to bolster the case that an exempt employee's primary duty is exempt work.
Having employees sign and acknowledge the accuracy of their job descriptions can help minimize liability in the event of a lawsuit.
 
Reach out to your FrankAdvice HR Consultant for assistance as needed as you prepare for the impact of the overtime rule on your business and stay tuned for additional updates.
How Do I Handle A Remote Employee Termination?

While certain factors may be out of an employer's control, handling the termination of an employee in a humane and effective manner is not. This has always been critical, but there are unique challenges when circumstances require letting an employee go remotely rather than in person. Regardless of the reasons for having to terminate an employee remotely, there are a variety of issues that the employer will need to grapple with, even in the post-COVID landscape.

The following steps will help employers handle remote terminations appropriately.
 
Step 1: Plan Ahead
 
There is never a substitute for good preparation. Before proceeding with an individual termination, make a checklist of all matters that need to be addressed with the affected employee prior to meeting with them, including:
 
  • Final pay requirements;
  • Benefits information (such as COBRA notification);
  • Return of company property;
  • IT issues; and a
  • Termination notification letter including the effective date and reason, if any, for the separation.

Putting together a list in advance of all company equipment or data that needs to be returned is particularly important in a remote work situation. For employees working in a different state, a manager cannot immediately collect their computer or company phone, for instance, as may be the case with employees on the work premises. See Step 5.

Also, give strong consideration to timing. A mid-week termination can be better than late Friday afternoon as it gives the employee the opportunity to access their network of professional contacts. In addition, send the virtual meeting invite for the same day to avoid creating unneeded anxiety in affected employees. And, ask if the person is available to speak confidentially.

Take into account that remote employees may live in different time zones, as well. For workers outside the US, employers should check the country and local laws to ensure they are meeting any requirements for notice prior to the termination date.

If employees have an inkling of what may be coming, it also gives them extra time to download customer information or trade secrets. Thus, it is a good idea to back up any company information an employee might be able to access before informing them of their termination.

Prepare a script in advance of what needs to be covered and be prepared to answer any clarifying questions about next steps. The employee will be listening closely, so having a script - without sounding scripted or robotic - will make it less likely that a manager may say something that will further upset the employee or give rise to a future lawsuit.

Finally, ensure the computer and all necessary hardware and software works properly in advance of the meeting. The last thing a manager wants is a frozen virtual meeting or dropped call because of unfamiliarity with the platform.
 
Step 2: Comply With Applicable Requirements
 
Always analyze any potential termination or layoff - whether involving remote workers or not - to ensure there is no adverse impact on protected individuals or groups that may lead to future discrimination claims.

Consider whether there is any reasonable alternative such as corrective action or a job transfer, depending on the circumstances. As part of that process, review any documents related to the termination (e.g., employee's personnel file, performance reviews). Also, check to ensure there are no collective bargaining obligations that may apply.

In addition, understand applicable state or local laws. If a remote employee works in a different state, for example, the rules may differ in terms of when a final paycheck must be provided along with what must be included or what can be deducted from the paycheck. Many jurisdictions have specific provisions governing payment at the time of termination and severance pay.
 
Other issues that can vary by jurisdiction include:

 

  • When and whether accrued vacation time must be paid out; and
  • Whether severance or arbitration agreements are valid.

For larger layoffs, the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act or a state mini-WARN Act may apply. Check applicable requirements as covered employers generally must provide written notice in advance of such layoffs. Under federal law, a covered employer must provide 60 days' advance written notice for a mass layoff or plant closing. Also, consider how remote workers factor in when the definition of a mass layoff under WARN or a state mini-WARN law specifies a single employment site.
 
Step 3: Break the News With Empathy and Compassion
 
Conducting the termination of an employee should always involve empathy and compassion, but this is especially crucial in the case of a remote termination when it may be more difficult to read the person's reaction. Use a video link or video conference to ensure there is eye contact and the ability to connect. The meeting should be short and respectful. Turn off all phones so there are no distractions.

Along similar lines, ensuring that there is privacy on both ends of the meeting is critical. For instance, the person conducting the termination would not want their child walking into the room during the meeting nor would they want the employee to be in Starbucks or some other public place for such a sensitive conversation.

Never inform an employee of a termination via email as it may anger or frustrate the employee. Doing so is akin to breaking up with someone via text message. While there is no perfect way to break the news, it conveys more respect when in person or via video teleconferencing. This also provides the o
pportunity to witness the employee's reaction and address questions they may have.

Include all necessary participants when breaking the news to eliminate the need for multiple conversations. Inform the employee at the start of everyone who is on the meeting. The employee should not have to face too many people on the monitor, though, so it is best to limit the number of people on the call.

Most importantly, listen with intent. Acknowledge the difficulty for the remote worker of not being able to say goodbye to co-workers in person if they had worked in the office or at the work site at some point.

Show compassion for the employee. If the termination is due to economic reasons beyond their control, stress that the layoff is not their fault and express gratitude for what they have accomplished.

Also, finish with clear next steps regarding what is required of the terminated employee in sending back equipment and discuss any remaining work commitments.
 
Step 4: Offer Support
 
Ensure that terminated employees are aware of any helpful resources, such as outplacement services, that may be appropriate. Also, point them to any information about unemployment benefits, including unemployment insurance. Remember that this information will vary by jurisdiction.

Be generous with severance benefits if at all possible. That can help assuage any bad feelings. Using an accompanying waiver or release along with severance pay or benefits can also help provide protection a
gainst future claims. Your employment attorney can assist you with a waiver or release.

In addition, you may offer a letter of recommendation if the termination was not performance related, and you can show a willingness to be a reference for the employee's job search. In the case of a larger layoff, use professional networks to spread the word about top team members and how they will make a great asset.

Before ending the video conference, email an official separation notice to the employee along with any key documents about their benefits and contact information for other resources such as the Employee Assistance Program. Then, confirm with the employee during the meeting that they have received the information.
 
Step 5: Secure Return of Company Property
 
While it is important to show empathy, do not lose sight of the fact that terminated remote employees may have more opportunity to cause damage because their equipment cannot be retrieved immediately. Have a plan in place for the return of company property and communicate the plan and timeline clearly to the employee.

Proactive steps an employer should take include:
 
  • Sending a shipping box, packing materials and pre-paid shipping label to the employee to make it easier for them to send their computer and/or other work equipment back immediately or as soon as is practicable;
  • Coordinating with IT on cutting the employee's access to the company's computer system and confidential information so the worker cannot delete or copy sensitive data post-termination; and
  • Advising the employee that any company data that may be on their personal devices, such as a smartphone or tablet, should be removed.

When allowed by applicable state and local laws, an employer may withhold from the employee's paycheck the cost of any items that are not returned when required. Check to determine if there are limits on the amount of any deduction.
 
Step 6: Notify Team in Meeting
 
Avoid the temptation to notify employees of a co-worker's termination via a teamwide email. Instead, act quickly so the rumor mill does not take control of the situation and create anxiety or disengagement. Speak to the team the same day that the termination occurs to head off gossip that could damage employee morale.

Direct managers to communicate what has occurred. Call a meeting and briefly discuss what happened without providing too much detail for privacy reasons. This meeting should include both in-office and remote workers and should focus on need-to-know details such as who is taking over the employee's duties.

If others will not be affected, communicate that clearly to reassure employees that their jobs are not at risk and to prevent valued team members from looking elsewhere. Provide a vision for moving forward by conveying any measures that are being implemented to avoid future terminations or layoffs.

Employees will judge the company's brand, including how it handles terminations, when thinking of talent referrals in the future. That is why it is critical to show humanity and let the team know that this was not an easy decision. Give the remaining employees a chance for dialogue and to voice any concerns. Avoiding the topic may only lead to more insecurity.
Finally, check-in regularly with those employees who remain, including remote employees.
What Are Top HR Priorities for 2024?

A new year often is a time to reflect on the accomplishments and failures of the year just past; however, it also should be a time to look ahead and plan for the year to come - not just known challenges like the dozens of compliance requirements taking effect on and around January 1, but also potential obstacles that are likely to arise. From the evolving nature of artificial intelligence to possible legislation relating to leave and immigration, businesses must be proactive and determine how to approach its priorities going into 2024. The following discussion addresses top HR priorities for the coming year.
 
EEO, Pay Equity and Pay Transparency
 
Ten states now have pay transparency laws on the books, and others are expected to pass their own laws soon. As pay transparency moves from the leading edge to the mainstream, applicants and employees increasingly expect employers to adopt transparent pay practices regardless of whether they are legally required.
 
Advancing equal pay is an Equal Enforcement Opportunity Commission (EEOC) enforcement priority for 2024-28, as well as an active area at the state level. Many states are strengthening their equal pay laws to cover additional protected characteristics, expanding the definition of comparable work, and creating incentives for pay equity audits. Employers will need to think broadly about the state of pay equity in their organizations and fix disparities proactively before enforcement or litigation forces the issue.
 
Changes to state harassment laws are making it easier for employees to prevail in harassment claims. Employers must ensure they have prevention, training, reporting and investigation strategies that foster a respectful culture where harassment is not normalized.
 
A recent Executive Order directs the US Department of Labor (DOL) to develop principles and best practices for employers regarding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the workplace, and the EEOC has identified AI and algorithmic discrimination as focus areas in its 2024-28 strategic enforcement plan. As this area rapidly evolves, employers must ensure any technologies they adopt that affect recruiting, hiring, compensation and other employment decisions do not violate discrimination laws.
 
Immigration
 
As they continue adjusting to using the new Form I-9, which was mandatory beginning November 1, 2023, and adopting the optional remote document verification procedures for E-Verify users, employers can expect even bigger immigration- and I-9-related changes in 2024.
 
Set to roll out over the course of the year, E-Verify NextGen will fundamentally change the way employment eligibility verification is conducted. The tool integrates the Form I-9 process with E-Verify and shifts much of the process away from HR and to the new hires themselves. Rather than have the employer enter information on the Form I-9 and transcribe that information into E-Verify, a newly hired employee will be able to set up a secure electronic account and automatically send their information and documentation to their E-Verify-participating employer. This new process aims to reduce data entry errors that lead to E-Verify mismatches.
 
Other changes in the pipeline include a modernized H-1B visa program that will change how United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) conducts the registration selection process to reduce the possibility of misuse and fraud, as well as a possible new authorized alternative documentation examination procedure for small, non-E-Verify employers.
 
Pregnancy/Disability
 
Companies with 15 or more employees should already be preparing for the EEOC's final Pregnant Workers Fairness Act (PWFA) regulations, expected by the end of 2023. The PWFA requires a covered employer to reasonably accommodate an employee's known limitations related to pregnancy, childbirth, or related medical conditions, barring undue hardship.
 
While the law took effect in June 2023, the regulations tell employers how the EEOC interprets the law, and what the agency expects from employers in terms of compliance. Covered employers that have not yet taken the time to strategize about possible accommodations should do so now. The EEOC has made it abundantly clear that protecting workers affected by pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions is a priority.
 
Perhaps the biggest challenge for employers in 2024 will be sorting out the pieces of the puzzle that local, state and, now even more, federal law have created in terms of protections for pregnancy, childbirth and related conditions. The PWFA does not replace laws that offer more or different protections, and it applies only to accommodations. This means that employers need to comply with the PWFA but also remember that the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA), the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), and their state and local counterparts may still apply in a given situation. 
 
Some employers may get hung up on whether they must do a particular thing for an employee, and why, and under what law. Sometimes that question will matter; but where the accommodation or adjustment is simple, practical employers in 2024 will just do it.
 
Wage and Hour
 
Employers should prepare to comply with the new overtime rule that the DOL proposed in September. Now that the comment period has closed, the DOL could finalize its rule at any time. The rule will likely take effect 60 days after its publication in the Federal Register.
 
Employers that hire independent contractors also should prepare for a new DOL rule that revives the decades-old "economic realities test" for determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Although this new test will have a limited application, it may tip the scales for some workers who teeter on the edge between employee and independent contractor.
 
Leave
 
Following the recent passage of paid leave for any reason laws in Illinois and the City of Chicago, employers should watch to see whether other states and localities follow suit in 2024. Multistate employers should consider adopting paid time off policies that meet the applicable legal requirements to reduce administrative burden and level benefits for employees across different jurisdictions.
 
Generally, employers should carefully monitor the increasingly employee-friendly leave law landscape. California employers, for instance, must prepare for five days of paid sick leave instead of three, as well as leave for a reproductive loss event, such as a miscarriage or failed adoption. Like reproductive loss leave in California, state laws providing leave for similarly sensitive issues are emerging in 2024, such as the Child Extended Bereavement Leave Act in Illinois, providing bereavement leave to employees who lose a child by suicide or homicide, and state laws expanding domestic violence leave protections in Nevada and Oregon. If employers have not done so already, now is the time to train managers not only the law, but also how to delicately handle difficult leave issues at work.
 
Labor and Unions
 
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) decision in Stericycle means a return to the days of heightened Board scrutiny of workplace rules and handbook policies. Under the new standard, rules and policies - even if facially neutral - will be deemed unlawful if they might be interpreted in a way that would chill employees' rights to unionize and to engage in collective protected activities. Employers have a high bar to meet to show a rule is lawful. They must first show that a rule serves a legitimate purpose and also that their substantial business interests cannot be accomplished with a more narrowly tailored rule.
 
Employers also should expect to see increased demands for union recognition in the wake of the NLRB's Cemex decision. The decision, and a memo from the NLRB General Counsel explaining how it will be applied, provides unions an easier path to recognition through card checks (showing a majority of employees in a proposed unit have signed union authorization cards). Under the new standard, employers have the burden either to recognize a union demand for recognition or file a petition within 14 days for a representation election. Employers that fail to do so or that commit an unfair labor practice during the election process will be subject to an order to bargain from the NLRB.
 
The NLRB has also issued a final rule that is expected to significantly increase the number of employees deemed joint employers. If two or more employers are joint employers under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), they are required to bargain with a union that represents the shared employees and are jointly liable for any unfair labor practices. Under the final rule, an employer's reserved or indirect control of the terms and conditions of a third party's employees (such as a franchisee) is sufficient to create a joint employment relationship. The effective date of the final rule has been pushed back to February 26 to allow time to resolve legal issues, but employers should consider any potential impact on their business operations.
 
Benefits and Well-being
 
Healthcare costs are expected to continue to increase next year, and employers are feeling the impact on their budgets. Coincidentally, the healthcare tech revolution is also accelerating, which will provide more opportunities for creative care solutions (i.e., increased use of telehealth/care-from-home). Employers should be prepared to invest in new, tech-forward care options for employees to increase access and equity while reducing costs.
 
Employers will also be called upon to support an unhealthier, more burned workforce that is experiencing one of the worst mental health crises in years. In 2024, we should expect to see more efforts to improve holistic employee health, inclusive cultures, and tech-forward health and well-being benefits.
 
Policies and Handbooks
 
Multistate employers that expand into new jurisdictions (whether by adding new physical operations or by hiring remote workers in additional locations) need to ensure that their employee handbooks for workers in those jurisdictions are updated and compliant.
 
To remain competitive and to stay ahead of the trends, employers also should consider adopting policies offering greater benefits than what is legally required, such as a pregnancy loss policy and an educational assistance policy.  Employers also should consider providing the most generous benefits to all employees, regardless of location to be known as an employer of choice (e.g., with reproductive loss leave being required in California, effective January 1, 2024, employers should consider providing this leave to all employees).
 
To stay culturally appropriate and reflect the current times, employers should review policies and use gender-neutral terms. A company's commitment to an inclusive workplace culture can be promoted by implementing diversity, equity, inclusion and belonging (DEIB) policies that reflect the organization's efforts so that employees from diverse populations feel welcome, supported and included. It will help promote a discrimination- and harassment-free workplace, which in turn may help reduce litigation risk and increase employee satisfaction, engagement and productivity.
 
Employers should be aware of risks using ChatGPT and other bots to create policies. A risk of bias and unintentional discrimination comes with using ChatGPT and other bots, as well as sometimes getting incomplete or incorrect information. Employers can help ensure AI is used properly and safely within the workplace by having a policy providing clear guidelines for the consistent and responsible use of and continued adoption of AI in the workplace.
 
Lastly, policies and handbooks should be reviewed to ensure review of the NLRB's Stericycle decision. Under the new standard, the NLRB considers a work rule presumptively unlawful if an employee could reasonably interpret the rule to restrict or prohibit Section 7 activity.
 
Artificial Intelligence (AI)
 
Recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) - particularly generative AI - have taken the workplace by storm. In 2024, employers can expect to see AI technology take center stage at work, transforming the workplace and the people within it through accelerated adoption.
 
Though AI will bring many benefits, early adoption shows that it can also displace employees. In this transformative year ahead, employers will arrive at an inflection point, and they must decide, as people leaders, what role AI should play in their organization.
 
Leading organizations will recognize AI as a tool to improve the employee experience and performance. They will embrace automation and AI to inform equitable workplace decisions, create work efficiencies, and enable employees to immerse themselves in meaningful work. To do this, they must ensure employees have the skills necessary to adapt to this new future of work.
 
Just as new AI tools have proliferated, so have conversations about AI ethics and regulation. At the federal level, the EEOC has announced important AI guidance, and the Biden Administration has officially initiated its efforts to regulate AI through an extensive executive order. Next year, leaders should expect to see AI regulation accelerate. To prepare, employers must ensure organizational readiness and implement safeguards.
 
Social and Political Climate
 
It seems as if the world and its socio/political landscape is becoming more unstable and complex by the day. It's only natural that employees may feel anxious, uncertain or even angry at the events occurring around them, here in the US and around the world. Organizations as a whole will have to confront the question to respond to conflict that may arise not only within the workplace but outside of it as well.
 
Whether it be the US presidential race or the ongoing conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, these are polarizing times and businesses will need to know how they respond to employees who look to provoke conflict or simply want their opinions heard. Employers may direct employees to codes of conduct or civility workplace policies but these days that may not be enough.
 
Employee Experience and Creating a Human-Centric Culture
 
Despite the proven benefits of a positive employee experience, very few employees are satisfied with their experience. Given the rise of today's 'experience' culture and expanding employee expectations, more and more organizations are focusing on employees' interests alongside those of customers.
 
Reimagining and forging a new path to drive a better employee experience is both simple and complex all at the same time: leaders will need to take a stand that supports organizational values and employees' expanding demands. That is not all. To prepare for the ever-changing future of work, leaders must be accountable for creating less-stressed and happier employees at home and at work, fairer workplaces where all talent is democratized, and more engaged workforces to advance business outcomes.
 
Clients of FrankCrum with the FrankAdvice HR Consulting Service can reach out to their HR Consultant for guidance and assistance with priorities for 2024.
What are some key considerations for the holiday season?

While some of the below considerations are not unique to this time of year, the holiday season often brings these issues front and center, exposing employers to significant risk. The holidays can be a wonderful time and employers can consider all employees’ celebrations as they promote the spirit of the season. Employers should handle holiday issues with care and this resource focuses on some key considerations.
 
Understand Holiday Party Pitfalls
 
A holiday party can boost morale, encourage camaraderie, and serve as a thank you to employees for a job well done. Employers should carefully plan the holiday party avoiding potential liability risks. For example, attendance should be optional, as mandatory attendance may cause wage and hour complications and entitle nonexempt employees to overtime. In addition, employers should anticipate that some employees may not want to attend the party for a multitude of reasons, such as religious observance, family obligations, financial resources (e.g., if gas or transportation is too costly for an employee), or health considerations (e.g., an employee abstains from alcohol and alcohol will be provided). Note, employees should not be excluded from other work activities, including future social events, if they do not attend.
 
In planning the party, employers should strive to create an inclusive event. All employees should be invited, including remote and hybrid employees. Decisions on the time and location of the party, dress code, food, and entertainment, should take into account whether certain choices may rule out some employees. For instance, a very limited menu may have the impact of excluding employees who follow religious dietary laws or those with food allergies. If alcohol is served, employers should inform employees ahead of time that non-alcoholic beverages will be available.
 
Watch Out for Alcohol Abuse
 
Workplace holiday events frequently involve alcohol. Employers should carefully consider the potential consequences of providing or allowing alcohol at holiday events and prepare to handle potential issues caused by drinking, such as injuries, harassment, or other inappropriate conduct. Employers that serve alcohol are responsible for monitoring guests' consumption and guaranteeing that individuals are sober before getting behind the wheel following the event. Employers may be held liable if an intoxicated person under the influence of alcohol or drugs causes an accident that injures a third party or damages third-party property. To help prevent any accidents, employers should designate a management employee to monitor employees' alcohol intake. In addition, providing employees with a set number of tickets or tokens that can be used to order drinks may curb excessive consumption.
 
Ahead of the holiday party season, employers should clearly communicate to employees the policies surrounding alcohol consumption at workplace social events. Employers may also consider recirculating the written policy on alcohol in the workplace, such as a Drug and Alcohol-Free Workplace Policy, to remind employees, including supervisors, about expectations during working hours.
 
Emphasize Work Rules
 
Employees, including supervisors, may be distracted, lackadaisical, or even rowdy, while working during the holiday season. Such feelings are often harmless and typical as employees approach the new year. However, employers should watch out for distractions that cut against productivity or employees' abilities to meet company needs, or, in work environments where physical safety is at risk (e.g., operating heavy machinery), put themselves or others in a dangerous position. Employers can remind employees of relevant work rules, including those addressing the dress code, discrimination, safety, tardiness, and attendance. If, in October, an employee had corrective action for violating the dress code because they wore a T-shirt instead of a polo shirt to the office, the employer should take corrective action with a similarly situated employee who commits the same violation in December, not let it slide just because it is the holiday season. Employers that fail to consistently enforce work rules risk allegations of unfairness and unlawful discrimination.
 
Some employees struggle at work not due to distraction or burnout, but instead because the holidays can be a difficult time of year. Before jumping to conclusions about why an employee did not follow a work rule, managers should make space for difficult conversations that may shed light on why an employee seems unlike their typical self. Ahead of the holiday season, a company-wide reminder of employer-provided resources, such as an Employee Assistance Program (EAP), may be particularly valuable to employees, while helping the employer prevent performance and conduct issues before they arise.
 
Approach Gift Giving Carefully
 
Giving gifts to co-workers, clients, vendors, or other third parties can symbolize appreciation and foster organizational ties. However, some forms of gift giving may run afoul of the code of conduct or may sound alarms of favoritism or even discrimination. Ahead of the holiday season, employers should remind employees of gift-giving rules. Employers should also ensure that all gifts are professional and appropriate. Providing examples of the types of gifts that are and are not permitted in the written policy helps employees understand employers' expectations and avoid potential issues.
 
Consider Leave Implications
 
Federal law does not mandate paid or unpaid leave on nationally recognized holidays, and holidays are considered regular workdays. Some state and local laws, however, require paid leave for any reason, which may require employers to grant employees' requests to use earned paid leave during the holiday period. Still, many employees expect employers of choice to offer some form of leave during the holidays. Plus, encouraging employees to take breaks during the holidays promotes a company culture that prioritizes employee well-being and may boost retention.
 
While many employers want to provide time off for the holidays, they may worry about meeting business goals when multiple employees take leave simultaneously. To help balance these competing interests, employers should remain flexible and plan as far in advance as possible. Given the popularity of time off during the holiday season, ideally, employers can plan in advance to fulfill business needs without restricting employee leave options beyond the limits set forth in the leave or paid time off (PTO) policy. 
 
Nonetheless, an employer that needs to limit holiday leave has options. To curb the number of employees taking off on a specific day (e.g., Christmas or New Year's Day), employers may choose to implement a prioritization system based on seniority or a first come, first served basis. Employers may require employees to provide advance notice within a particular timeframe or choose to limit time off to specific days (e.g. an employee can take off on Thanksgiving Day or Christmas Day, but not both) or a set number of days (e.g., an employee can take no more than five days off between Thanksgiving and New Year's Day). Employers may also incentivize working on unpopular days by providing additional perks to employees who volunteer to work that day. Employers should ensure all leave limitations are clearly communicated to employees via the company leave policy.
 
Review Seasonal Employee Requirements
 
Employers hiring seasonal employees should regularly review applicable laws and make sure that managers and HR understand how laws and employer policies apply to seasonal employees. If hiring minors, employers should be aware of federal and state laws restricting the times, days, and hours during which a minor may work, as well as the types of work minors may perform. Employers should determine how hiring seasonal employees impacts coverage under federal, state, or local employment laws, such as leave protections. Such laws may cover seasonal employees or count seasonal employees toward coverage thresholds. Additionally, employers that hire seasonal workers from temporary staffing agencies may be considered joint employers under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA), or other federal, state, or local laws. Employers should also keep in mind that hiring requirements still apply. Carefully onboarding seasonal employees, including collecting the requisite new hire paperwork like I-9s and W-4s, and following all hiring requirements, is essential. Conducting orientation sessions regarding work rules and employee conduct helps seasonal employees know what is expected of them and may prevent conflicts down the road.
How to Prevent Discrimination Against Veterans/Military Personnel

In recent years, several new laws have been passed on the federal and state level that provide job protection to members of the military and their families. These new laws protect not only those brave individuals who serve in the United States Armed Forces, but in some cases, military family members as well. Such employees, in addition to veterans and military employees, must be protected from all forms of discrimination in the workplace based upon their connection with the military. In order to keep claims of veteran and military discrimination at bay, an employer can follow the steps below to ensure that its work environment is welcoming to, and supportive of, veterans, members of the military and their families.
 
Step 1: Determine Applicable Federal and State Veteran and Military-Related Laws
 
The Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) is the primary federal statute prohibiting employment discrimination on the basis of military service. USERRA prohibits employment discrimination against employees or applicants based on prior or current military service or an intention to serve in the future. The Act applies to service in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, Coast Guard, and Public Health Service commissioned corps. Service includes the reserve portions of those entities.
 
The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) provides eligible employees with the right to take up to 26 weeks of unpaid leave during a single 12-month period to care for an injured service member, or up to 12 weeks of unpaid FMLA leave for qualifying exigencies arising out of the employee's spouse, son, daughter or parent being on covered active duty, or being notified of an impending call or order to covered active duty. Qualifying exigencies are defined as including the following:
 
  • Short notice of military deployment involving seven or fewer days of advance notice and allowing up to seven days of leave;
  • Military events and activities relating to military service or call to active duty status of a covered military member, including attending official ceremonies, events or programs sponsored by the military, and family support or assistance programs;
  • Childcare and school activities for a covered child, including arranging for alternative childcare when military service requires a change in the existing arrangement, providing urgent or immediate childcare because of military service, enrolling or transferring into a new school or daycare program because of military service, and attending school or daycare meetings because of military service;
  • Financial or legal arrangements for a covered military member, including making or updating financial or legal arrangements to address a military member's absence, and acting as a representative of a military member before a federal, state or local agency to obtain, arrange or appeal military service benefits during the military member's active duty or call to active duty and for 90 days after the end of active duty status;
  • Counseling by a non-health care provider for the military service member, spouse or a covered child of the military service member, if the need for counseling arises from the active duty or call to active duty status of a covered military service member;
  • Rest and recuperation for up to five days to spend time with a covered military service member on short-term, temporary rest and recuperation leave during deployment;
  • Post-deployment activity, including attending arrival ceremonies, reintegration briefings and events and other official military ceremonies or programs for up to 90 days after the end of active duty service, and addressing issues related to the death of a covered service member while on active duty status including meeting and recovering the remains and making funeral arrangements; and
  • Other events recognized by the employer and employee to be qualifying exigencies.
 
In addition to these federal laws, many states offer employment protection for individuals who have served in the military or who are called to serve while employed. Employers should ensure that all relevant laws protecting veterans and members of the military are identified and understood.
 
Step 2: Post or Deliver Required Notices
 
Employers are required to provide a notice entitled Your Rights Under USERRA to those employees who are protected by the law. This notice should be posted in a conspicuous area where other employee notices are customarily placed, or an employer may hand out or mail the notice, or distribute it via electronic methods.
 
Step 3: Prepare and Distribute Policies
 
Once the employer determines which federal and state laws govern its obligations toward veterans, members of the military and their families, it is critical to prepare policies that set forth what the employer and employee's rights and obligations are based on both the law and the employer's own benefit policies. 

The relevant policies should be included in an employee handbook and should be available on any internal website, as well. If an employee is called for duty, it is a good practice to provide that employee with the policies again at that time.
 
Step 4: Train Supervisors
 
Supervisors should know and understand the employer's policies with respect to discrimination against veterans and members of the military and their families. If a supervisor is presented with official paperwork regarding a call to duty, the supervisor should refer the employee to the appropriate individual at the company.

In addition, because military action can be a highly political topic, it is important that supervisors and managers make an effort to curtail any discussions among employees that could be perceived to create a hostile work environment.
 
Step 5: Determine Employee Eligibility for Benefits
 
When an employer is approached by a military employee for benefits or time off pursuant to applicable laws, the employer should review the relevant policies to determine whether the employee is eligible for any benefits. Simply because the employer is covered by a particular law does not mean that every employee will be eligible, so it is important to understand what benefits each employee is entitled to before making any promises.

For example, the FMLA applies to employers with 50 or more employees. However, employees are only eligible for FMLA leave if they meet certain criteria (e.g., employees must have worked at least 1,250 hours for the employer in the 12 months prior to taking a leave in order to be eligible for leave pursuant to the FMLA). If an employee announces that he or she needs to take time off to care for an injured service member but the employee does not meet all of the criteria for an FMLA leave, it is important to make sure that the employee understands why he or she is not receiving the same time off that another employee (who was eligible) may have received so that the employee does not feel that he or she is being treated unfairly.
 
Step 6: Maintain Comprehensive Records
 
All correspondence with a veteran, member of the military or a military family member regarding his or her veteran status or military membership or activity of the individual or a family member should be saved and filed. If in-person meetings or telephone calls regarding these issues occur, the employer representative at the meeting or participating in the call should take appropriate notes and include those in the employee's personnel file.
 
Step 7: Designate Leaves as Necessary
 
Leave taken pursuant to certain laws (such as the federal FMLA) need to be designated in writing. When determining which laws apply to the employer, it is wise to figure out which laws, if any, have this designation requirement so that any relevant leaves can be designated in a timely fashion.
 
Step 8: Ensure Equal Treatment
 
It is essential that the policies employers put into place in connection with military activity be applied to employees in an equal manner. While it is appropriate for policies to provide different benefits to different types of employees (for example, more senior employees or employees who have been with the employer for longer periods of time may be eligible for more paid time off), similarly situated employees must be treated the same.
 
Step 9: Understand Reinstatement Obligations
 
If an employee has taken a protected leave of absence, he or she is entitled to be reinstated to the same or a comparable position. For example, USERRA entitles a civilian employee who leaves his or her job to perform military service to be reemployed in that civilian job when the military service concludes. USERRA's reemployment protection applies when the service member has five years or less of cumulative military service while with his or her employer. USERRA provides the following remedies to covered employees:
 
  • Back pay;
  • Lost benefits;
  • Corrected personnel files;
  • Lost promotional opportunities;
  • Retroactive seniority;
  • Pension adjustments; and
  • Restored vacation.
 
Veterans Day is Saturday, November 11th.
How Can I Have Difficult Workplace Conversations?

Sometimes there is no substitute for a one-on-one conversation. But talking can be hard, especially with employees, at work, about uncomfortable topics - like annoying habits, hygiene issues, or tardiness.
 
While every situation is unique, there are some common threads and helpful steps for managers to keep in mind when tackling those tough workplace talks.*
 
*Important caveat: Conversations involving accommodation requests, harassment or discrimination complaints, internal investigations into potential misconduct and any situation requiring emergency intervention (not an exclusive list) require a different approach and are outside the scope of this article.
 
Step 1: Identify the Issue
 
A manager should start with a solid understanding of the concern before the conversation with the employee. Stepping away from personal feelings and pinpointing why the issue is an issue is a critical first step. At the same time, they should keep an open mind until they have all of the available facts.
 
Step 2: Review Relevant Policies
 
Before the conversation, the manager should review the organization's handbook or policies to determine whether they apply to the situation (e.g., hygiene or grooming policy). The manager should then clearly identify conduct that runs contrary to the organization's guidelines or violates work rules to discuss with the employee.
 
Step 3: Exercise Caution
 
The manager should take care when potentially wandering into territory that calls for caution. For example, is there a medical issue that may implicate disability accommodations? If so, they should refer to the important caveat above, as a different plan may be in order (and they should potentially seek qualified HR and legal counsel).
 
Step 4: Mitigate Negative Feelings
 
If the conversation feels heavy or induces anxiety, the manager should consider the cause: expectations about the employee's reaction, a lack of confidence about the subject matter or something else? Then, they should consider any potential solutions: ask others for advice, research the issue and practice delivering the desired message.
 
Step 5: Know the Objective
 
Is the ultimate point of this conversation information sharing, improvement or a final warning? For example, if the goal is improving performance and retaining the employee, the manager should make a plan to discuss with the employee and get them on track. If the issue is recurring poor behavior, they should determine whether this is the final stop on the road to potential separation and be sure to consult with HR.
 
Step 6: Have a Communication Plan
 
While the content of the message is important, the delivery is critical to how that information lands. The manager should consider how to successfully present and discuss the issue to foster a true exchange of thoughts and ideas with the employee.
 
Step 7: Accept the Unknowns
 
The manager should release any expectations about how the conversation will go or how the employee will receive the information. They must accept that preparation will only go so far.
 
Step 8: Have the Conversation
 
When it is time to talk, the manager should:
 
  • Be direct about the reasons for the conversation, including any policies at issue.
  • Stick to the facts but converse with empathy.
  • Engage in active listening, let the employee speak from their perspective and truly take in what they are saying.
  • Agree on the objective, the path forward and a target date for follow up.
  • Clarify the consequences for failing to take requested action.
 
Step 9: Document the Conversation
 
It can be difficult or feel unnatural to take notes during a difficult conversation with an employee. It can be hard enough to stay on task and keep emotions in check. If so, the manager should take the time to document everything they can remember about the meeting soon afterwards (e.g., date, start and end times, meeting mode/location, attendees, purpose, what was discussed).
 
Step 10: Follow Up
 
Talking can be tough, but also fruitless if action does not follow. The manager should remember to review whether the agreed-upon goal has been met and to discuss next steps. If additional follow-up is needed, they should have another conversation with the employee.
 
Reach out to your FrankCrum HR Consultant for guidance as needed on having difficult conversations.
Do I Really Have to Give New-Daddy Leave?

Times have changed regarding parenting roles and expectations. Men are playing a bigger part in the lives of their children and taking on more caregiving responsibilities. This is good for the employees’ children and families, society, employee morale, and fostering healthier workplaces that recognize the importance of family.

Under the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA) and many state family leave laws, any eligible employee can take protected time off from work for baby bonding within the first year after a child’s birth. While many of these laws have been in effect for well over a decade, it is only in the last few years more men are using their FMLA leave for baby bonding.
 
Many employers ask if any paternity leave exists, forgetting FMLA and state laws (where applicable) allow all eligible employees, regardless of gender, to use this leave for baby bonding. Employers need to keep up with the times and recognize the importance of providing this leave to all employees, not just women, and ensure they are not discouraging employees outside the “traditional caregiver” stereotype from using it.

Do:
  • Notify employees that baby bonding leave is available to every employee under circumstances where the company is required to provide such leave under state or federal law.
  • Post required federal and state FMLA notices in the workplace.
  • Include a policy in your handbook if you employ 50 or more employees for federal FMLA (many state family leave laws apply to employers with less than 50 employees).
  • If aware, meet with the soon-to-be parent to review eligibility for FMLA or state family leave and provide required notices.
  • Assure employees that employment or future opportunities will not be denied if baby bonding leave is taken.
  • Document an employee’s request for baby bonding leave and ensure the leave is designated properly.
 
Don't:
  • Assume an employee outside the “traditional caregiver” stereotype is not covered under family leave laws.
  • Assume an employee is not interested in taking baby bonding leave.
  • Assume employees are already aware of all their rights under family leave laws simply because you posted notices and have a handbook policy. Employers also have an affirmative obligation to provide notice if they have information suggesting an employee may have a qualifying reason to take leave.
  • Assume employees must specifically ask for baby bonding leave to invoke their rights. Again, you have an affirmative obligation to provide notice if you have information suggesting an employee may have a qualifying reason to take leave.
  • Assume employees must be married to take baby bonding leave – they do not. In fact, if the employee stands in loco parentis to the child, the employee doesn’t even need a biological or legal relationship with the child.
 
The takeaway for employers -- Don’t overlook any employee’s right to baby bond. Be sure you know your obligations, and your employees’ rights, when it comes to family leave in your state. Not sure what they are? Contact your FrankAdvice HR Consultant with questions.
 
What is the latest on the proposed DOL overtime rule on the horizon?

 
The US Department of Labor (DOL) submitted a draft overtime rule to the White House's Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on July 10th. The OMB has up to 100 days to review the rule. The proposed rule would then be published in the Federal Register and the public would have at least 30 days to comment on it before the DOL can issue a final rule. Then the final rule would take effect no sooner than 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register, assuming it is classified as a major rule. So it is looking like the DOL will have a final effective rule around the end of this year/the beginning of next year.
What can we expect and what should we do now if anything?
First and foremost, the DOL will likely propose raising the minimum salary for most employees exempt from the overtime requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) from its current level of $35,568 per year. Some estimate the new minimum salary will be somewhere in the high forty thousands to low fifty thousands.
The DOL also may propose annual inflation adjustments and/or make changes to the overtime exemptions' duties tests.
Even if the final rule faces legal challenges, it is prudent to be prepared to comply in case the rule is ultimately upheld.
Employers can take this time to review their practices for compliance. Some common mistakes employers can make with the FLSA are misclassifying employees, withholding pay, and miscalculating overtime.

 

  • Misclassifying employees: Incorrectly classifying an employee as exempt instead of non-exempt
  • Withholding pay: Failing to compensate for activities considered work time or making improper deductions from a paycheck, for example
  • Miscalculating overtime: Failing to base overtime pay on the regular rate of pay, which is defined as total compensation divided by total hours worked

 

Make sure employees are properly classified, and since responsibilities can change, regularly review exempt employees to make sure they continue to meet the duties test that applies to their position. Comply with the FLSA and state and local labor laws, and pay employees correctly.
 
Stay tuned for additional information and best practice tips in FranklyHR when the proposed rule is published.
 
Does the WARN Act Apply?
 
The Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act covers only certain types of employers and requires advance notification only in specific circumstances. The following chart will help an employer to determine if it is covered by the WARN Act, and if so, whether the WARN Act requires advance notification for an upcoming layoff, site closure or reduction in force (RIF).  

If the employer is not covered, then it need not provide advance notification of an upcoming layoff or RIF. If, on the other hand, the employer is covered and the circumstances require advance notification under the law, the employer must comply with the notification provisions of the WARN Act.
 
 
 
 
NOTE: The WARN Act is federal law. A few states (and Philadelphia, PA) have their own mini-WARN laws. Check out the Business Resource Guide By State on MyFrankCrum and reach out to your FrankAdvice HR Consultant with questions regarding layoffs and RIFs.
 
How Can I Reframe Culture Fit to Avoid Its Dangers?
 
There is a lot of talk these days about ensuring new hires are a good fit for a company's culture. But trouble can occur if "culture fit" becomes a euphemism for something else.

HR consultant Patty McCord, a former chief talent officer at Netflix, told the Wall Street Journal a few years ago, "What most people mean by culture fit is hiring people they'd like to have a beer with."

But the person you might like to have a beer with might not make for the best employee.
 
Defining Culture Fit Correctly
 
Culture fit is hiring people aligned with company values and who are excited about its mission. Culture fit should not be gut feeling or opinion. Company culture should also consider unique contributions and perspectives.
 
The Comfort Zone
 
So how does a company know if it is misusing culture fit in the hiring process? There are some common red flags to watch for, including:
 
  • "I just have a really good (or bad) feeling about that candidate."
  • "She reminds me of myself!"
  • "I'm just not sure how the rest of the team might respond to him."
  • "He went to my school."

If you hear those quotes, you may have entered the "comfort zone." That can be dangerous. Culture fit is the catchphrase often used if a candidate does not mirror what they like, what they are used to, and what is easiest to work with.

 

Discrimination Risks
 
The comfort zone, and using “fit” as hiring criteria, could open up employers to discrimination risks. An employer could risk keeping out segments of workers from consideration and deprive themselves of operating their business at their full potential.

A worst-case scenario is that using irrelevant "fit" criteria could lead to discrimination claims. It is important that job descriptions and interview processes be relevant and consistent.
 
Culture Fit Consideration Takeaways
 
Employers should be mindful of how they are integrating and defining culture fit. Fit should be linked to functionality and not to comfort. Employers can integrate techniques in the hiring process to underscore their mission and values.  Interview questions could include the below to evaluate the appropriate cultural alignment between company and candidate:

 

  • A candidate's ideal workplace environment (e.g., independent vs. collaborative, office-centric vs. remote);
  • How a candidate responds to or works through stress or how they handle disappointment;
  • Lessons learned from a mistake the candidate made in the past;
  • Views on what organizations should do to maximize employee engagement; and
  • The reason(s) for a candidate's interest in the company.
How Can I Prevent Wage Discrimination?
 
All employers should be keenly aware of their obligation to make certain that their employees are paid fair and equal wages to avoid lawsuits brought under the Equal Pay Act (EPA) and other laws. This article looks to assist employers who wish to avoid costly wage discrimination lawsuits.
 
Step 1: Understand the Laws
 
The Equal Pay Act (EPA) requires that men and women receive equal pay for equal work. Generally, jobs do not have to be identical for equal pay to be required, but substantially equal in terms of skill, effort, and job responsibility and performed under similar working conditions. The term pay refers not just to salary but also overtime, bonuses, vacation and holiday pay, stock options, life insurance, and all other benefits and compensation of any kind paid to employees. Pay disparities may be allowed under a seniority system, a merit system, or a system measuring earnings by quality or quantity of production or if wages were set based on a factor other than sex. In addition to the EPA, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibit wage discrimination based on race, religion, sex, national origin, age, and disability. However, unlike the EPA, the other statutes apply even if the jobs in question are not substantially equal.
 
Step 2: Institute a Policy Prohibiting Wage Discrimination
 
Employers should implement and enforce a policy prohibiting compensation discrimination or wage discrimination based on an employee's membership in a protected class. This can often be part of a discrimination policy or EEO policy that prohibits discrimination in compensation. Employers need to make sure that all employees are paid fair and equal wages based on their position and skill.

  

Step 3: Make Decisions Based on Skill and Performance
 
Employers need to make sure that all employment decisions regarding promotions, raises, bonuses, etc., are based on legitimate and nondiscriminatory factors such as skill, merit, and performance rather than an employee's membership in a protected class. Employers should avoid wage differentials based on sex, race, national origin, or any other protected class unless they can be justified by legitimate and nondiscriminatory reasons.
 
Step 4: Document Guidelines and Requirements for Salaries and Bonuses
 
Employers should make sure that any salary guidelines or requirements for any bonus (whether it is based on merit, productivity, sales, or commissions) are well documented and based on fair, objective, predictable, and measurable criteria. This should be adequately conveyed to employees so that they know what the employer's expectations are and are not left wondering how an employer arrived at a particular decision. 
 
Step 5: Be Aware of State and Local Laws Prohibiting Wage Discrimination
 
Employers need to be aware that a number of states have laws prohibiting wage discrimination. Although the federal EPA only specifically prohibits wage discrimination on the basis of sex, some state laws may go beyond this. Employers should familiarize themselves with the laws of the state and cities in which they operate.
 
Step 6: Document and Be Ready to Defend All Employment Decisions
 
Employers need to make sure to carefully document all decisions regarding pay, performance, and promotion. Doing so will provide an adequate record and serve as a defense in case of a claim of wage discrimination.
 
 
Step 7: Audit Pay Practices
 
Employers should review their pay practices to make sure that they are not engaging in discrimination. Employers should make sure that any differentials that do exist are based on legitimate and nondiscriminatory factors and supported by written documentation, and if they are not, they should correct them. By doing so, employers may dramatically reduce the chance that they will be faced with a claim for wage discrimination.
 
Step 8: Aim to Hire an Integrated and Diverse Workforce
 
Employers should try to make sure that they hire and recruit qualified candidates regardless of gender or membership in a protected class. Employers and hiring managers should make decisions based on education, skill, and merit. Employers should avoid making stereotypical assumptions about what a job applicant can and cannot do based on his or her membership in a protected class.
 
Step 9: Provide Timely and Effective Performance Evaluations
 
Employers should aim to provide employees with yearly or biannual performance evaluations. In doing so, employers should clearly set out the employer's expectations and show the employee how the employee is meeting them or not meeting them.
 
Step 10: Do Not Prohibit Employees from Discussing Wages
 
Employers should not prohibit employees from discussing information regarding wages, salary, or benefits with other employees. The National Labor Relations Act specifically affords employees the right to engage in mutual concerted protected activity and work collectively to improve their wages, hours, and working conditions. In addition, states such as California, Colorado, Illinois, and Michigan have laws that prohibit employers from requiring that employees refrain from discussing their wages and/or waive their right to discuss such information.

 

How Do I Document Reasonable Suspicion of Impairment?
 
Documenting reasonable suspicion of impairment in the workplace is becoming increasingly vital to ensuring workplace safety and productivity.
 
Impairment at work may lead to decreased overall morale and productivity, absenteeism, injuries, fatalities, workplace theft and increased turnover. In addition, this type of conduct leads to increased liability risks for employers, as well as possible increases in health care and workers' compensation costs.
 
Documenting reasonable suspicion of impairment can be used to corroborate drug test results, especially in cases where the drug test may not conclusively prove impairment at the time of test administration (e.g., marijuana or cannabidiol use).
 
Employers should consider training supervisors and managers on:
  • Recognizing signs of impairment; and
  • Properly documenting those signs when present.
 
Documenting reasonable suspicion of impairment should be undertaken whenever:
  • A supervisor or manager has observed directly that something is amiss (e.g., involvement in a workplace incident or accident resulting in property damage);
  • An employer receives a report from a worker regarding possible impairment or drug or alcohol use; or
  • The employer receives a complaint from a customer or vendor.
 
An employer's designee (i.e., supervisor, manager) should directly observe the employee and environment and ensure that any information is properly documented.
 
To document reasonable suspicion of impairment observations, an employer should take the following steps.
 
Step 1: Follow Best Practices in Documentation
 
An employer should encourage supervisors and employees to follow best practices in documentation. Specifically:
 
  • Document observations as close in time to the occurrence or event as possible;
  • Ensure observations are:
    • Specific;
    • Articulable; and
    • Contemporaneous.
 
Any documentation should be kept in a separate, confidential file.
 
Step 2: Document Basic Facts
 
A supervisor should document the basic facts of the occurrence. Specifically, note:
  • Employee information, such as full name;
  • Date of observation;
  • Time of observation; and
  • Location of observation.

  

Step 3: Document any Physical Characteristics Observed
 
Ensure that any physical observations are documented. These include observations related to:
 
  • Walking. Notations include steady, unsteady, swaying, stumbling, staggering, dizziness, holding on for balance, falling or an inability to walk;
  • Standing. Notations include steady, unsteady, holding on for balance, falling or an inability to stand;
  • Movements. Notations include tremors, twitches, lack of coordination, fidgeting, muscle stiffness;
  • Eyes. Notations include bloodshot, watery or glassy; whether the eyelids are droopy, heavy or closed; and whether the pupils are dilated;
  • Appearance. Notations include whether a subject's appearance is tidy or untidy, disheveled, messy or dirty; whether the subject is fully or partially dressed; whether the subject's clothing is stained and if there is evidence of bodily excrement on clothing; evidence of sores or puncture marks on the body; excessive sweating; apparent chills.
  • Face. Notations include sweaty, flushed, peaked, swollen, droopy or pale;
  • Speech. Notations include whether the subject's speech is slow, slurred, shouting, profane, rambling, excessive talking, incoherent, slobbering, loud, silent or whispering; and
  • Odors. Notations include body odor; bodily excrement odor; faint or strong alcoholic odor; smell of marijuana; excessive cologne.
 
Observers may make a notation of "normal" in any of these categories. In addition to providing a framework for notations, an employer may wish to encourage observers to describe the observations in their own words.
 
Step 4: Document any Behavioral Characteristics Observed
 
An employer should ensure that any behavioral observations are documented. These include observations related to:
 
  • Demeanor. Notations include whether the subject is silent, sleepy, lethargic, fatigued, crying, talkative, highly excited, aggressive or combative, abusive (either verbally or physically), nervous, irritable, confused, inattentive, erratic, paranoid, exhibiting mood swings, euphoric, increased self-confidence or unable to feel pain;
  • Actions. Notations include erratic, hostile, fighting, threatening, hyperactive, carelessness in executing tasks, forgetfulness, trouble concentrating, repetitive motions or behaviors, excessive itching or scratching or reduced appetite/skipping meals; and
  • Energy level. Notations include highly energetic, highly active, lethargic, depressed reflexes, delayed reactions or unconscious.
 
Observers may make a notation of "normal" in any of these categories. In addition to providing a framework for notations, an employer may wish to encourage observers to describe the observations in their own words. 
 
Step 5: Document any Environmental Observations
 
An employer should ensure that any environmental observations are documented. These include observations related to:
 
  • Any drugs present in the workplace. Notations of powders, pills, tablets, crystals, liquids, or marijuana cigarettes should be documented;
  • Any paraphernalia present in the workplace. These include any pipes, bongs, needles, razor blades, mirrors;
  • Any notable objects present, such as flasks, bottles, or cans;
  • Any over-the-counter medications;
  • Any inhalants present, such as glue; and
  • Any overheard conversations regarding alcohol or drug use. These may include any references to street names, slang, or alternative names of drugs.
 
Observers may make a notation of "normal" in any of these categories. In addition to providing a framework for notations, an employer may wish to encourage observers to describe the observations in their own words.
 
Step 6: Use Discretion
 
The results of the documentation could be used to refer the employee for drug testing under a workplace drug-testing policy. Those individuals involved in the documentation should use discretion when discussing and handling the results.
 
 
Step 7: Take any Necessary Next Steps
 
The employer's designee who is documenting the event should take any necessary next steps dictated by internal policy, compliance obligations and best practices.
 
Once the documentation is concluded, and depending on the results, a variety of next steps may be warranted. Best practices dictate that a second supervisor or manager be asked to document reasonable suspicion in order to corroborate the initial findings.
 
In addition, other factual evidence that is close in time to the suspicion of impairment may be noted, such as:
 
  • Frequent or continuous absences from work;
  • Patterns of lateness to work;
  • Any workplace accidents or notable/unusual incidents; and
  • Poor performance or misconduct issues.
 
Next steps include an employee:
 
  • Returning to work;
  • Being referred for drug and/or alcohol testing;
  • Being referred to an employee assistance program (EAP);
  • Being referred for training;
  • Being subject to corrective action for poor performance or misconduct.
 
If drug and/or alcohol testing is the next step, an employer's designee may accompany the employee to the testing site and ensure that the employee is transported home safely (i.e., the employee does not drive home). Some policies may dictate that the employee be placed on leave while the test results are pending.
 
Step 8: Guard Against Retaliation
 
Fostering a culture in which employees feel confident and comfortable in reporting any concern to a supervisor helps ensure a fair, safe and compliant workplace. Anyone involved in the reasonable suspicion documentation and testing process should refrain from retaliating against an employee for reporting a safety concern or a policy or law violation to the employer.

 

How to Handle an Employee Who Violates the Dress Code
 
When developing a dress code policy, employers should seek to create one that meets the employer's specific needs. A dress code policy can help an employer to promote a positive image to clients and customers by emphasizing the importance of professionalism among employees. For a dress code policy to be successful, however, it must be consistently enforced. Enforcement will be easier if employers and supervisors follow the steps outlined below.
 
Step 1: Identify the Best Dress Code Policy for Employees
 
Employers have several options to choose between when deciding on a dress code policy, including:
 
  • A business casual dress code policy;
  • A more formal dress code policy;
  • A casual dress code policy; and
  • Uniforms.

The employer should choose a policy based on its specific goals and the job duties of the employees the policy was created for. For example, if most employees are involved in some form of manual labor, it is not practical to require them to dress in formal dress or even business casual attire. Having clear goals and reasons for having a particular dress code policy also will help employers and supervisors in explaining the policy to employees if they question the reasons for having to dress in a certain manner.

Employers may have to enforce more than one type of dress code policy. Employers may have different policies for different types of employees or may have summer dress code policies, or policies for more casual attire. Knowing what policy is relevant to every employee is essential, and should be clear for both the employees and the employer.
 
Step 2: Publicize the Dress Code Policy
 
If employees are not aware that the policy exists, or what is required under the policy, they cannot be expected to follow it. To ensure that employees are aware of what is required under the policy, the employer may want to:
 
  • Post a copy of the policy in visible areas including employee rest areas, like the employee lounge, and on the employer's intranet if possible.
  • Publish the dress code policy in the employee handbook and require that new employees sign and acknowledge that they have received and understand the dress code policy and consent to its terms.
Example: I have read and understand the dress code policy of [Enter Employer Name] and will follow the above-stated policy when dressing for work. I also understand that any violations of the dress code policy of [Enter Employer Name] may be grounds for corrective action, up to and including termination.
 
  • Distribute a copy of the dress code policy to all employees, and new copies again to all employees if any changes are made or during the summer months when employees may be permitted to dress more casually.
    • Example: NOTICE as of January 1, employees will be allowed to wear more casual dress to work on Fridays. [Enter Employer Name] is adopting a "Casual Friday Policy" on a temporary basis.
  • Provide employees with regular reminders about the existence of the dress code policy.
  • If there is a need for more specific guidance, post pictures on what is and is not permissible under the dress code policy, or demonstrations on appropriate clothing for work.

  

Step 3: Observe Employee Attire
 
Monitor employee dress to determine if any violations have occurred. The dress code should be consistently enforced so that standards are the same for all similarly situated employees. If an employee violates the dress code, the employee, should be spoken with immediately. If supervisors grow lax about implementing the dress code policy, it will be very difficult for them to enforce it.

Example: If one employee wears a revealing shirt to work, and it is a busy day so the supervisor says nothing, it will be very difficult to tell another employee that they have to go home and change if they later wear a similarly revealing outfit.
 
 
Step 4: Talk to the Employee if There Is a Violation
 
Upon noticing a violation of the dress code policy, it is important to speak to the employee. This should occur in a private area or office to avoid embarrassing the employee in front of their co-workers.
 
To ensure a smooth conversation, employers or supervisors should do the following:
  • Ask if the employee realizes that they are violating the dress code;
  • Explain which items of the employee's attire specifically violate the dress code;
  • Do not pass judgment on any of these items; and
  • Do not criticize the employee's style.

Example: Do not say, "Who are you trying to attract by revealing so much skin in that outfit?" or "I don't know where you found such an ugly shirt."
 
 
Step 5: Ask if the Employee Has a Reason for Violating the Dress Code
 
Employers should try to determine whether the employee has a reason for violating the dress code to make sure that the violation was not caused by a religious reason, for example, or caused by a disability or medical issue.

Make sure that the employee is not seeking some sort of accommodation to the dress code policy based on religion or disability. If the employee is seeking an accommodation, the issue may have to be investigated further. It is important to remind the violating employee, and other employees, that if an employee is seeking an accommodation, the employee should request the accommodation before wearing the offending clothes to work.

When possible, the employer should make every effort to accommodate legitimate reasons that an employee has for violating the dress code policy such as religious beliefs or practices. For example, an employee may seek to wear a head covering or a certain hairstyle or refrain from wearing certain garments based on their religious beliefs. If a supervisor has a question about how to enforce the policy with regard to accommodation issues, the supervisor should contact HR. The employer should convey that it cares about the reasons behind why the employee violated the policy and that the employer will do everything possible to address those reasons.
 

Step 6: Determine How Best to Correct the Dress Code Violation
 
Supervisors should determine whether it is possible to correct the violation without sending the employee home from work.

Example: If the employee is wearing a torn or stained uniform, but there is a clean uniform on-site, the employee can be told to change.

Example: A female employee is wearing an overly revealing spaghetti strap tank-top, but has a sweater, which can be used to cover her shoulders.

If there is no way to fix the dress code violation without sending the employee home, send the employee home and tell them to take the rest of the day off, since it is not practical to come back to work after changing. Hourly employees should be given the choice of using their accrued vacation days to cover the time off, or not being paid for that day. Supervisors should not become personally invested in the situation and should act professionally at all times.
 
 
Step 7: Counsel and Take Corrective Action
 
Inform the employee that this type of behavior will not be tolerated. If it is a first-time violation, inform the employee that further violations will lead to increased corrective action measures, up to and including termination. If the individual has already violated the policy, determine the amount of times that a violation has occurred and decide how to treat the violation accordingly.

After every violation, the supervisor should record the violation in a log so that is a written record of employee violations on a going-forward basis, and so that corrective action measures are conducted in the most transparent manner possible. The supervisor should write the date when the violation occurred, explain the scope of the violation, and record the measures taken to deliver corrective action to the employee or to counsel the employee so as to prevent a recurring situation.

When the employer or supervisor notices that a particular employee has violated the policy several times, even before another violation occurs, it may be prudent to take the employee aside and again warn the employee of the corrective action measures that will be taken if there are any further violations. This may prevent the employer from having to suspend or terminate the employee when the dress code policy is violated another time.

 
Step 8: Be Mindful of the National Labor Relations Act and Protected Concerted Activity
 
In implementing any dress code policy, employers should remember that under Section 7 of the NLRA employees in both union and nonunion workplaces have a right to engage in protected concerted activity and collective action to improve their wages, hours, and working conditions. Wearing union insignia or displaying a union logo on clothing may be viewed as a form of protected concerted activity. Therefore, in developing, implementing, and enforcing any dress code policy an employer should be careful to comply with the NLRA and make sure that such a dress code is narrowly drafted and does not interfere with employee Section 7 rights. A work rule prohibiting employees from engaging in protected concerted activity or one that can be reasonably construed as attempting to prohibit protected concerted activity may be found unlawful.
 
Although an employer may seek to promote a professional image and have a legitimate safety and business reason for prohibiting employees from confrontational, slanderous, insulting, or provocative clothing, an employer should be careful that such dress code policy is not overbroad. An employer may not prohibit employees from wearing any clothing with words or messages that are derogatory toward the employer as this could be considered a form of protected concerted activity and protest regarding employee wages, hours, and working conditions.

Further, an employer should also remember that a dress code for union employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining. Accordingly, an employer is required to bargain with any unions regarding a dress code before unilaterally imposing one.
How Should I Handle Workaholic Employees?
 
While it is wonderful to have employees who are fully committed to their work, there may come a time when an employer realizes that a high-performing employee is a workaholic. A workaholic typically has a compulsive obsession with his or her job. Workaholism can cause physical and mental ailments to the workaholic, as well as disruption in the workplace. Employers who feel that one or more of their employees is a workaholic will find it helpful to follow these steps to resolve the situation.
 
Step 1: Understand the Potential Problems Caused by Workaholism
 
Workaholism comprises an employee's compulsive need to work. This results in an employee's self-absorption in work, to the exclusion of other interests or relationships.
Workaholism resembles other dependency behaviors, such as alcoholism or compulsive gambling. In fact, the support organization Workaholics Anonymous models its 12-step program based on the Alcoholics Anonymous program.
 
Because of a driving need to perform, many workaholics are rewarded with career and financial success. Therefore, some people feel that workaholics should not be required to alter their controlling behaviors. Supervisors, in particular, may be comfortable with an extreme work pace and may find an effort to change them difficult and disruptive.
 
A workaholic often exhibits:
 
  • A compulsion to work long, hard hours to the exclusion of personal commitments and responsibilities;
  • A focus on quantity, rather than quality, of work;
  • Physical ailments such as headaches, fatigue, indigestion, and chest pain;
  • Behavioral issues, including temper tantrums, restlessness, insomnia, impatience, mood swings, and forgetfulness;
  • Mental and emotional reactions such as anxiety, paranoia, and a lack of self-confidence or self-esteem; and
  • Difficulty supervising others due to a need to control, an inability to delegate, and a tendency to micro-manage.

 

In addition, workaholism may contribute to workplace difficulties among co-workers, such as low morale, absenteeism, and high turnover.

 
Step 2: Identify the Underlying Causes of Why an Employee Works Excessively
 
While working longer than the standard work week for a temporary period of time may be required to meet certain short-term business obligations (for instance, an accountant in a public accounting firm during tax season), employees who routinely work in excess of 60 hours per week put themselves at risk for physical and mental health problems.
 
However, just because someone works long, hard hours does not automatically mean they are a workaholic. 
 
Employees may work longer hours:
  • Out of a desire to get ahead in their career;
  • Because of an excessive workload brought about by short staffing;
  • Due to poor work habits or improper training;
  • To work on a temporary, short-term project;
  • Due to normal seasonal increases in workload; or
  • As a way to avoid personal problems or issues.
 
A true workaholic puts their job above all else, at the risk of alienating friends and family
 
Workaholics generally:
  • Get insufficient sleep and exercise;
  • Have poor eating or personal habits;
  • Continue working during non-routine work hours (such as evenings and weekends);
  • Frequently take work home with them;
  • Strive for and rarely achieve perfection in their work;
  • Miss personal and family events due to work commitments; and
  • Refuse to take vacations or continue to work while on vacation.
 
Step 3: Consider the Implications of Workaholism on Internal Policies and Employer Liability
 
Before making any decisions about how to treat employees who are exhibiting signs of workaholism, consider the implications under any federal, state, or local laws as well as the impact on organizational employment policies.
 
Review federal, state, and local laws that may be applicable. Federal law prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability. Because workaholism may be perceived as a disability or may coexist with other psychological impairments that are categorized as disabilities, workaholic employees may be covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
 
Additionally, depending on the employer's population size or location, there may be state or local laws that inform the action an employer may take when dealing with a case of workaholism. For example, because workaholism may coexist with other compulsive or stress-related behaviors, local laws addressing bullying, harassment, or workplace violence may be pertinent.
 
Review internal policies that may be applicable. Aside from a traditional corrective action policy, there may be other policies in an organization's employee handbook that are affected by workaholism as well. These may include:

 

  • Attendance;
  • Company benefits;
  • Overtime pay;
  • Time off, including vacation, sick leave, and leaves of absence;
  • Work-life initiatives;
  • Antiharassment, bullying, or workplace violence; and
  • Workers' compensation.

 

How each of these internal policies relates to a workaholic employee will depend on the specific wording of the policy and the individual involved. However, treat all employees even-handedly and fairly when applying any internal policy. If necessary, consult an HR professional.
 
Step 4: Schedule a One-on-One Meeting With the Employee to Discuss the Situation
 
After considering the potential reasons why an employee might be working longer hours, take time to privately discuss the situation with the employee in order to pinpoint the actual cause, identify if there is a problem and determine a solution.
 
Arrange a private face-to-face meeting with the employee. Sit down and talk to the employee in private to determine the root cause behind why the employee works long hours.
 
During the meeting:
  • Avoid making accusations;
  • State specifics about what was observed and any related concerns;
  • Be empathetic, respectful and maintain a professional tone;
  • Stay on topic and control the conversation; and
  • Listen to what the employee has to say.

 

To support the claim that a problem exists, the employer should provide documented evidence of the performance-related impact that overworking is having on the employee, as well any detriment to the employee's co-workers.
 
Determine if the employee might be a workaholic. Employers who believe an employee is exhibiting signs of workaholism should counsel the employee in the same manner they would counsel an employee they suspect might have any other addiction. However, diagnosing and curing a workaholic is best left to a mental health practitioner.
 
Work with the employee to define a workable solution. As with other addictions, workaholics may not view their personal situation as a problem. However, it is the employer's responsibility to ensure the health and safety of each and every employee.
 
Therefore, if the employer suspects that the employee needs assistance overcoming their work addiction, enact a moderation plan that introduces balance into the employee's life.
 
Specific steps might include:
  • Professional counseling through an employee assistance program (EAP) or other mental health program;
  • Establishment of boundaries regarding work, including strict starting and ending times;
  • Restrictions on an employee's mobile devices, such as a mobile phone, personal digital assistant (PDA) or laptop;
  • Mandatory time off, such as a vacation or leave of absence;
  • Supervisory training with specific focus on the elimination of disruptive behaviors such as micro-management and poor delegation skills; and
  • Redefinition of the employee's work role or reassignment of workload.

 

Document the outcome of the meeting. Employers are not legally required to create a written record of their meeting. However, as with any employee counseling session, doing so provides notice to the employee regarding future expectations and provides a written record that may help limit the employer's legal liability if further corrective action is required.
 
Be sure to include complete details of the discussion, the date and time of the meeting, and an outline of the agreed-upon action plan. Provide a copy of the document to the employee and include a copy in the employee's personnel file.
 
Step 5: Schedule a Follow-Up Meeting and Enforce the Action Plan
 
Regularly follow up with the employee in order to ensure that employee's adherence to the action plan. This includes both informal and formal progress reviews.

Overcome an employee's resistance to acknowledging a problem and encourage employees to accept help by motivating them to change their behavior in a positive way.

As with any workplace issue, more than one discussion regarding an employee's performance problem may be required. These discussions may take place over a period of time and typically increase in formality.

Ultimately, if there is no change in behavior, an employer may administer corrective action to correct performance or work conduct deficiencies.
How do I manage employees with caregiving responsibilities?
 
Family Responsibility Discrimination (FRD), also referred to as caregiver discrimination claims, is a hot topic these days. Although being a caregiver is not a protected class under federal law, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has recognized that stereotypes based on gender may give rise to discrimination claims based on sex under Title VII.
 
An example of prohibited conduct based on gender would be allowing a female employee, but not a male employee, to leave early three times a week to care for minor children.
 
Title VII, however, is not the only basis for an employee to assert a claim of discrimination based on caregiving responsibilities. If an employer stereotypes its employees who are caregivers, it may also constitute discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
 
It is important to remember that the ADA also prohibits discrimination against an employee who is associated with an individual with a disability, such as a child, spouse, or parent.
 
For example, an employer may not reject a job applicant because the employer presumes that the applicant's caregiving responsibilities for a child with a disability would prohibit him or her from performing the job.
 
Under this example, the applicant may be able to successfully argue that the prospective employer violated the ADA because its failure to hire the employee was because of the applicant's association with an individual with a disability.
 
Finding work-life balance has also become more difficult in recent years and is an issue that has come to the forefront for many employers.
 
Employers commonly find that employees are not only responsible for caring for their own children but many are also responsible for taking care of their aging parents. It is also not uncommon for grandparents or other family members to have primary responsibility for the care of grandchildren or other minor family members, such as nieces or nephews.
 
Because of these changes in the workplace, the EEOC has taken a closer look at FRD or caregiver discrimination claims. The EEOC has even issued guidance, including tips and best practices for employers who have employees with caregiving responsibilities.
 
To effectively manage employees with caregiving responsibilities, a prudent employer can follow these steps.
 
Step 1: Focus on Qualifications
 
An employer should focus on an applicant or employee's qualifications and the requirements of the position, rather than the fact that the employee has children, is a single parent, or is responsible for the care of their elderly parent(s). The employee's qualifications should be the focus at every stage of employment, including recruiting, hiring, promotion and retention.
 
Step 2: Communicate With Individuals With Caregiving Responsibilities
 
Effective communication is vital to properly managing employees with caregiving responsibilities. An employee should feel comfortable speaking with his or her supervisor or manager about making changes to his or her schedule or other issues that may arise with regard to caregiving responsibilities. Supervisors and managers should be open, honest, and solution-oriented. Employers should take care to properly train managers and supervisors to effectively communicate with employees with caregiving responsibilities. It is imperative that supervisors and managers do not take frustrations out on an employee because of his or her caregiving responsibilities.
 
Step 3: Document Any Issues Promptly
 
Documentation can be an employer's best friend or an employer's worst enemy. When it comes to working with an employee with caregiving responsibilities, it is wise to document any conversations with the employee, such as excessive absences or other issues that may arise as a result of their caregiving responsibilities. This is also where effective communication comes into play.

Any agreements or alternative arrangements, such as reduced hours or adjustments to work schedules, made with an employee with caregiving responsibilities should be properly documented to avoid confusion later.
 
Step 4: Review Policies and Practices
 
It is a good idea for an employer to periodically review policies and practices, particularly as they relate to compensation and performance evaluations, to make sure that employees with caregiving responsibilities are not being punished for taking protected leave or time off to take care of their caregiving responsibilities. For example, although an employer's attendance policy may be neutral on its face, it may adversely affect a single mother who has to leave early one day a week to take her disabled child to therapy.

Although employees with caregiving responsibilities are still responsible for competently performing their job duties, it is wise for an employer to double-check its policies and the application of those policies to see if there is an adverse impact on employees with caregiving responsibilities.
 
Step 5: Be Flexible
 
An employer should consider flexible work arrangements and allow employees to use PTO, sick leave, vacation time or other time off to take care of caregiving responsibilities. An example of flexible work arrangements and using time provided by the employer would be allowing an employee to work from home for several hours each day and use vacation time to care for a child with the flu so that the employee receives a full paycheck for that particular week.
 
If the employee is one an employer wants to retain, but recognize that the employee's caregiving responsibilities may cause excessive absences or that he or she must arrive late or leave early to fulfill their caregiving responsibilities, the employer should talk with the employee about the possibility of working a flexible schedule, telecommuting, reduced-time options or taking intermittent leave. An employer may also consider whether it is possible to reassign certain job duties and should, if at all possible, avoid mandatory overtime policies.
 
There are a number of accommodations that can be made to retain valuable employees with caregiving responsibilities while also meeting the needs of the employer.
 
Step 6: Investigate Complaints Thoroughly
 
Unfortunately, it may get to the point where an employee reports that he or she feels that they are being treated differently because of their caregiving responsibilities, or asks for help with their job because they are having difficulty managing both their work responsibilities and those at home. If this happens, it is imperative that the employer take a serious look at the matter, discuss it with and get input from the employee, and try to come up with practical solutions that also assist the employee, while making sure that the employer's needs are met. Seek assistance from the HR representative as required.
How Can I Create A Smoke-Free Workplace?
 
Many employers throughout the country have chosen to enact smoke-free workplace policies to protect the health of their employees. In addition to eliminating exposure to a major cause of disease and death, a smoke-free workplace also makes sense from a business cost perspective. It reduces healthcare costs, absenteeism, and lost productivity, while also decreasing maintenance costs and reducing insurance liability risks and premiums.
 
Creating a smoke-free workplace can be a huge undertaking, but the benefits far outweigh the time and effort.
 
Step 1: Recruit a Team
 
Employers may want to set up a task force to oversee the entire policy implementation process. The focus should be on creating a cross-functional team that incorporates top management and employees of all levels from different areas of the business (including union representatives, if applicable). The team should include nonsmokers, smokers, and former smokers.
 
Step 2: Educate
 
Employers should first gather information to educate the task force and, eventually, the entire workforce. One part of gathering this information includes surveying all workers about their knowledge and concerns so that these issues can be addressed before creating the policy.
 
As part of the kick-off, you can distribute smoking statistics from the CDC (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention), the Surgeon General's Warning, and information from the American Heart Association.
 
Step 3: Create and Implement a Written Policy
 
It is important to create a written policy that sets expectations in clear concise text and avoids any confusion in interpretation. A written policy is always taken more seriously as it is an unmistakable law of the company to which all employees, visitors, contractors, consultants, and vendors alike must adhere.
 
Have a Rationale for the Policy
 
Inform the audience of the reasons for the policy. Let them know the decision-making body enacted the policy to protect employees, contractors, customers, and visitors from secondhand smoke and to ensure a safe work environment.
 
Present the Policy in a Positive Light
 
Employers should present the policy in a positive light while at the same time acknowledging that affected employees may find it initially challenging. Emphasize the health and social benefits of a tobacco-free work environment. Encourage employees to make responsible decisions about the health of their bodies and to have respect for their team members by adhering to the smoke-free work environment.
 
Be Concise
 
Being concise does not mean making the policy short; however, it does mean that the policy should be no longer than necessary without omitting any important information. It is important to keep it clear and simple; the more straightforward the policy is, the easier it is to understand and enforce.
 
Identify the Winners and Losers
 
By implementing a smoke-free work environment, the employees who smoke might feel as if they are being alienated. To avoid this, it is important to make the policy as detailed as possible when outlining the positive outcome that will be achieved by the entire workforce.
 
Assign Responsibility
 
Employers might consider including everyone in enforcement responsibilities, not just management. It is important to emphasize that it is everyone's responsibility to work as a team in adhering to a smoke-free work environment. If employees are represented by a union, employers should work closely with the union to create a smoke-free policy. The employer should find out if employees have a right to smoke in the workplace under the existing contract and should understand how the collective bargaining process may affect the development and enforcement of a smoking policy.
 
Enforce the Policy
 
Employers should write an enforcement policy that is consistent with other personnel policies and disciplinary procedures. For instance, the number of allowed breaks should be addressed under the company's general break policy and should apply to all workers, smokers and nonsmokers alike.
 
Step 4: Announce the Policy Commencement
 
Employers should announce the policy several months before the start date with a letter from the company's owner or Chief Executive Officer.
 
Step 5: Train
 
All managers must be trained on how to handle employee, contractor, visitor or customer concerns, questions, and infractions, should they occur.
 
Step 6: Communicate
 
Employers should use all methods of communication for the initial smoke-free workplace policy launch including email and handouts placed on every workstation. Proactive, clear, and consistent communication is key. This is also a very important part of enforcement. It is important to ensure the written policy and signage remains in break areas, hallways, and entrances.
 
Employees should be reminded of the policy at all staff meetings, team gatherings, and events. Where possible, put information about the policy, including cessation programs, in newsletters and any other employer publication.
 
Step 7: Obtain Employee Acknowledgement
 
Policy acknowledgments should be signed and a record of all acknowledgements must be kept. Introduce and review the tobacco-free policy during the employee hiring onboarding process.
 
Employers should also reinforce the reasons for the policy by using resources like posters or company newsletters.
 
Step 8: Prepare for the Policy Start Date
 
Employers should post "no smoking" signs, remove ashtrays and tobacco vending machines, and place receptacles for smoking materials at the designated distance outside entrances (or remove receptacles entirely if adopting a smoke-free campus/facility policy).
 
Hold a Kick-Off Event on the Day the Policy Starts
 
Employers can invite guest speakers including healthcare professionals, former smokers, and current smokers in the process of abstaining from nicotine.
 
Employers may offer help to workers who want to quit smoking. If the workplace chooses to do this, it should plan in advance how this will be done.
 
Focus on Workers Who Smoke
 
Providing cessation assistance to smokers who try to quit as a result of the policy can increase acceptance of the policy. It is also the best way to make sure that a business maximizes the potential health benefits, and cost savings, of that smoke-free policy.
 
If an employer provides health insurance it should check to see if that policy covers cessation services (including counseling and medication). If it does not, it would be beneficial to look into adding such cessation assistance; this is the most cost-effective benefit that can be offered to workers who smoke.
 
Step 9: Enforce the Policy
 
Violating the policy may result in anything from corrective action or mandatory completion of a smoking cessation program, up to and including termination of employment. In addition, employees and the company could be subject to civil fines for not complying with the local no-smoking laws.
 
It is important to monitor the policy. Have a point person in top management who tracks how the policy is going. Managers should report questions, concerns, or infractions to this person.
 
Employers should make it clear that violators will not be tolerated and the punishment for infractions should be clearly defined and executed immediately for all levels of the workplace.
 
Reach out to your FrankAdvice HR Consultant as needed for assistance and guidance on creating a smoke-free workplace.
How Can I Hire a Veteran?
Military veterans may bring a host of skills that can aid employers. Nonetheless, many veterans find it difficult to re-enter the workforce. Some employers lament that they are only too eager to hire a veteran, but have not had any candidates. Others are uncertain how military skills will translate into a civilian job. However, there are good candidates out there for well-intentioned employers if they follow the proper steps.
 
Step 1: Know Where to Look
 
A veteran's status is not always obvious. However, the U.S. Department of Labor has a useful resource through its Veterans Employment and Training Service (VETS), which provides information about how to find qualified veterans for your organization. It also has a step-by-step toolkit for employers for recruiting veterans, accommodating wounded warriors, and retaining them.

Employers looking to tap into the talent pool for returning vets have many other options available as well provided they are willing to go beyond their normal search. These options may include:
 
  • Placing advertisements in military-focused publications or niche job boards;
  • Looking for ads about job fairs for veterans, the military, and their families;
  • Meeting local labor department representatives designated to work with veteran job seekers;
  • Using specialized LinkedIn groups to spread the word; and
  • Connecting with college career centers to find qualified vets who returned to school.

Employers also may turn to websites such as www.hireveterans.com and Employer Support of the Guard and Reserve to post jobs and find out about other ways to connect with job candidates who are veterans.
 
Step 2: Design a Strategy
 
It is important to have a strategy that includes engaging an employer's senior leadership to ensure that key decision-makers are committed and will provide visible support for hiring veterans. This should include identifying trusted leaders, if necessary, to help the effort. It also may include reviewing job descriptions to ensure they are accurate. The more accurate the job description is, the more likely an employer will attract qualified veteran candidates who understand how their experience may translate to the job.
 
Step 3: Address Negative Perceptions
 

Certain supervisors may have knee-jerk reactions about job candidates with a military background. These perceptions may include that such candidates will:

 

  • Just follow orders when initiative is what's needed;
  • Lack the minimum years of experience or educational requirements;
  • Get called up for service or need to relocate more so than other applicants; or
  • Bring the risk of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) into the workplace.

 

These perceptions should be addressed through training. For instance, a veteran who lacks a fixed amount of private employment experience may have acquired skills in the military that are transferable to the workforce. Also, stereotypes about veteran applicants being susceptible to recall or PTSD may run afoul of federal employment laws such as the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) or the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994 (USERRA).

 
Step 4: Demystify Resumes of Military Veterans
 
Returning military veterans may well have resumes that differ noticeably from other candidates. Military job functions have unique descriptions and jargon. An employer should familiarize itself with the civilian equivalents of these job functions. Toward that end, interviewers should do some preparation before meeting with applicants.
 
Step 5: Ask the Right Questions
 
It is important to ask job applicants with a military background open-ended questions to draw them out and avoid a "yes" or "no" response. Veterans may not speak to their accomplishments unless prompted.

For example, asking about specific day-to-day activities in the military may enable the interviewer to learn about useful experiences an applicant has had that could help the employer. This may also prove true in asking what challenges they were facing or what kind of training they received. Drawing veterans out in this fashion makes it simpler to see how their skills might translate to the civilian workforce.

Knowing what NOT to ask is equally important. Just as it would be inappropriate to ask female applicants if they are planning to start a family, employers should not ask veterans if they are currently on reserve status and, if so, if they will be deployed soon. Another inappropriate question would be asking if the applicant received "anything other than an honorable discharge."
 
Step 6: Comply with Applicable Laws
 
The questions in the previous step would run afoul of USERRA, which prohibits discrimination against job applicants or employees based on prior or current military service. USERRA is the primary federal employment law prohibiting such job bias, and it applies to all employers.

The ADA also offers protections to applicants with disabilities, including veterans who may have been injured while serving. Title I of the ADA prohibits an employer from treating an applicant unfavorably in all aspects of employment - including hiring - because they have a disability, a history of having a disability, or because the employer regards them as having a disability. However, an employer may still ask a veteran with a disability how they can perform the essential functions of the job.

In addition, some states offer additional protections for individuals who have served in the military. Employers should identify these laws and make sure they are understood.
 
Step 7: Hire for the Right Reasons
 
There are tax incentives available for employers hiring veterans. Others wish to favor vets during the selection process simply for patriotic reasons or, in the case of federal contractors, to boost their hiring benchmarks with the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP).

 

But employers should still strive to hire the best candidate. Otherwise, a disservice may be done both to the business and to job applicants. In addition, a veteran's hiring preference may have the unintended effect of having an adverse impact on women since they make up a small percentage of veterans. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) notes that voluntary veterans' preferences are still subject to scrutiny under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
 
Step 8: Develop Engagement and Retention Procedures
 
To help ensure that qualified veteran applicants become effective employees, employers should take steps to make newly-hired veterans feel like part of the team. This may include creating a mentoring program to link them with existing veteran employees, military spouses, or family members.

In addition, veterans are used to working with training plans so the employer should explain how the veteran will be trained to handle new job duties. It also is a good idea to ensure frequent "check-in" periods during the first weeks and months of employment.
 
NOTE: Veterans Day is observed on November 11th. Five states—Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Oregon, and Tennessee—require private employers to provide time off to veterans on Veterans Day. The employer is allowed to choose whether to offer paid or unpaid time off.
How Do I Address Domestic Violence in the Workplace?
Domestic violence is a very serious issue that can have a drastic impact on the lives of the affected employee, his or her co-workers and the workplace as a whole if not handled properly by the employer. Although the violence takes place outside the workplace, it has the ability to impact every facet of a victim's life including their work situation; it can follow an employee into the workplace and cause myriad issues. An employer should be prepared to implement policies, practices, and procedures to help manage domestic violence victims, assist them in seeking the treatment they need and prevent workplace violence. In order to address domestic violence in the workplace and provide protection to employees and co-workers, an employer should do the following:
 
Step 1: Understand What Domestic Violence Is
 
Domestic violence is defined as violence committed by a spouse or family member in which one individual uses physical violence and/or sexual, mental, or economic abuse to control the other partner. It is not only physical but can be experienced in the form of harassment, threats, intimidation, bullying, isolation, and other coercive and controlling acts. It is important for an employer to understand that domestic violence does not discriminate and anyone can be a victim. It is not dependent on race, sex, religion, ethnicity, or economic status.
 
Step 2: Recognize the Cost of Domestic Violence to Employers
 
An employer should recognize that domestic violence carries significant risks and high costs for employers. In the short term, domestic violence can lead to lower workplace productivity, decreased employee morale, increased employee turnover, strained relationships between co-workers as well as poor job performance, lack of concentration, and attendance issues. Further, if an employer fails to properly manage domestic violence victims by refusing to grant them time off to attend court hearings or obtain medical treatment for injuries or illnesses caused by domestic violence incidents, the employer may face claims under Title VII, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and state laws. Additionally, domestic violence can lead to increased health care costs for employers as victims need to seek medical treatment for physical and mental issues as well as counseling.
 
Further, the violence may follow the employee into the workplace. A perpetrator of domestic violence may stalk the victim at work, call or visit the workplace repeatedly, or interfere with and disrupt workplace productivity. An employer may also face tort liability or liability under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act) for failing to provide a safe and secure workplace free from hazards and for failing to protect other employees from harm should an incident occur at work. Further, an employer may open itself up to claims of negligence, negligent failure to warn, and intentional infliction of emotional distress if the domestic violence occurred between co-workers or if the employer failed to adequately protect the victim and co-workers from violence. In the very worst of scenarios, domestic violence victims and their co-workers may face serious harm and even death.
 
Step 3: Adopt Policies and Procedures Against Violence
 
It is essential for an employer to develop and implement policies and procedures addressing workplace violence and domestic violence. With regard to workplace violence, an employer should advise employees that hostile, abusive, threatening, or violent conduct is against workplace policy and will not be tolerated. It should institute a workplace violence protection program and attempt to keep employees safe from harm.
 
With regard to domestic violence, the policy should notify employees of the protections and assistance the employer will provide to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking and set forth that it will take all necessary steps to provide a safe and secure working environment. It should incorporate a complaint procedure allowing employees to bring discrimination, harassment, or retaliation complaints in confidence if they face adverse action based on their status as a domestic violence victim. It should assure such individuals that the employer will respond with an investigation, remedial measures, and corrective action if needed. It should assure employees that the employer will provide reasonable accommodations to employees who are domestic violence victims in the form of workplace modifications (such as scheduling modifications or changing the workstation or work telephone number) or time off if doing so would not cause an undue hardship for the employer. Further, victims of domestic violence should be instructed to report if they have obtained a restraining order against another individual so that an employer can take appropriate measures to keep co-workers and the workplace safe.
 
Step 4: Provide Training to Employees and Supervisors
 
An employer should make sure to provide training to employees and supervisors on domestic violence and workplace violence. The training should remind employees of the importance of reporting potentially dangerous situations to the employer. The employer should stress that domestic violence is a serious issue that will not be tolerated. Employees should be assured that all reports of violence will be kept confidential to the greatest extent as permitted by law so that employees are more likely to report situations. Further, an employer may want to consider offering workshops and guest lecturers from counseling centers or the employee assistance program, if one exists.
 
Supervisors should be trained to recognize problems among their employees and identify victims of domestic violence, including signs and symptoms of stress or physical harm caused by domestic violence. If a supervisor begins to notice signs that an employee is being physically abused away from the workplace, such signs should not be ignored and the supervisor should do anything that he or she can to help that employee. Not only will this help the employee, but it may prevent violence from entering the workplace.
 
Supervisors should also know how to report all instances to the employer so that the employer may immediately respond and take action. Supervisors should be trained on the importance of privacy and confidentiality when handling issues of domestic violence. Employees should feel comfortable bringing their concerns to management and having their complaints addressed in a timely and confidential manner. Supervisors should be trained on how to respond in a sensitive manner and show employees they are available to provide the necessary support. Employees should not feel afraid to voice their concerns and should be assured that the employer will address them.
 
Step 5: Provide Domestic Violence Victims with Assistance and Time Off
 
An employer should provide domestic violence victims with the assistance they need in terms of time off to tend to injuries or attend court appearances and social services. It is best practice for an employer to be accommodating and understanding and provide victims with needed support so they remain effective employees.
 
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) suggests that an employer should provide reasonable accommodations to domestic violence victims by, for example, allowing them to take time off to tend to injuries, attend court hearings or provide leave to treat depression in order to avoid discrimination claims under Title VII and the ADA. Further, a handful of states such as New Jersey and California as well as the District of Columbia specifically permit domestic violence victims to take time off to attend court hearings or seek medical treatment or counseling. Other states permit employees who are victims of a crime to take time off to attend criminal court proceedings. Further, some recently enacted paid sick leave measures in states and cities allow domestic violence victims to take paid leave to seek treatment.

Other employees may be permitted to take time off under federal or state family and medical leave acts in order to treat domestic violence injuries if the injuries rise to the level of a serious health condition. Further, some employers may adopt procedures that allow employees to use sick time, vacation time, personal time or disability leave to take time off for domestic violence issues.
 
Additionally, an employer may want to consider providing employee assistance programs and/ or assisting victims in seeking help from community resources.
 
Step 6: Avoid Discrimination Against Domestic Violence Victims
 
Although no federal law prohibits employers from discriminating against domestic violence victims, employers may face liability if they discriminate against domestic violence victims on the basis of sex or disability. For example, an employer may be liable for sex discrimination if it treats a female victim differently than other employees experiencing the same or similar performance or absence issues. An employer may be liable for sexual harassment if both the victim and the perpetrator work for the employer and the extent of employer liability will depend upon whether the perpetrator is a supervisor or a co-worker. Additionally, an employer may face liability for disability discrimination if it discriminates against an individual suffering from mental or physical health issues such as head injuries, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder based on incidents of domestic violence. In such cases, employers should be prepared to provide individuals with disabilities who are victims of domestic violence with reasonable accommodations if it would permit them to perform the essential functions of their job.
 
On the state level, some states have enacted laws specifically prohibiting discrimination and retaliation against domestic violence victims and recognizing them as a protected class. A handful of states also require employers to provide employees who are domestic violence victims with reasonable accommodations so that they may perform their job safely. Such reasonable accommodations may include changing the victim's work schedule, transferring the victim, changing the parking arrangements, separating a perpetrator and a victim if both work for the employer, alternative work hours, or screening contact between the perpetrator and the victim.
 
In light of potential employer liability, employers should have policies and procedures banning discrimination against victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking. Further, if an employer has to take an adverse employment action against a domestic violence victim, make sure that there is a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason for doing so.
 
Step 7: Cooperate with Law Enforcement and Increase Safety Measures
 
Additionally, if an employer is aware that an employee is a victim of domestic violence, the employer should develop a safety plan that lets the employee and co-workers know what to do if the perpetrator enters the workplace. The employer may want to consider enhancing security measures and increasing protections which may include changing locks or key cards, hiring additional security guards, transferring the employee, changing the employee's hours, alerting the police, and making the identity of the perpetrator known. The employer should make sure to consult with the victim and assess the safety risk.
 
Step 8: Proceed Cautiously When Taking Adverse Action Against Employees Who Perpetrate Domestic Violence
 
An employer should be sure to show its employees that it takes incidents of domestic violence, sexual violence, and stalking very seriously and that the employer does not tolerate threatening, abusive and violent conduct. It may also seek to state that employees convicted of a serious crime may be terminated. While it may be premature to take adverse action against an individual who is involved in a domestic dispute, once an employer has concrete evidence that domestic violence has occurred in the form of a criminal conviction or guilty plea, or that an individual has engaged in hostile, abusive, threatening or violent behavior that violates the employer's policies, the employer should take appropriate action. However, an employer should be cautious and not jump to conclusions by assuming guilt before it is proven unless there is a clear connection to the employee's work or the domestic abuse extends into the workplace and is between co-workers. In any event, an employer should proceed cautiously and make sure not to compromise workplace safety.
How Can I Set Up an Employee Suggestion Program?
The goal of a successful employee suggestion program has always been to tap into the ideas and creative thinking of employees in an effort to improve work processes, systems, methods and products. A properly managed suggestion program can improve morale, increase productivity, cut costs, and raise retention rates. However, creating and implementing an employee suggestion program should not be undertaken lightly. While asking employees for their input is a great method of motivating workers, make sure that the program has the proper management support and reward structure to engage employees or it will not be successful. If employers decide to create an employee suggestion program, it is wise to adhere to the following steps.
 
Step 1: Understand the Common Reasons Why Suggestion Programs Fail
 
According to historians, the idea of workplace suggestions started nearly 300 years ago in Japan. While the process of offering suggestions in the workplace has changed somewhat over time, the reasons for their success or failure have not. Common reasons employee suggestion programs fail include:

  • A belief that management is not truly interested in employees' ideas;
  • A slow response to employees' suggestions;
  • Insufficient explanation about why a suggestion is accepted or rejected;
  • Too many rules surrounding participation;
  • Concern over biased judgments about which suggestions to approve or disapprove; and
  • An inconsistent, unpredictable, or unacceptable reward and recognition system.

Understanding where an employee suggestion program can go wrong enables employers to point it in the right direction.
 
Step 2: Obtain Buy-In from the Leadership Team Before Designing the Program
 
Once employers understand where their employee suggestion program might go astray, the next step is to enlist the support of the management team. Leaders must show enthusiasm and commitment to the program if it is to generate the desired results.
 
Obtain management buy-in. The success of any program depends largely on the support provided by organization leaders. That support can be obtained by demonstrating how the program will:
 
  • Make money for the organization;
  • Help the organization achieve one or more goals;
  • Lead to the success of other projects; and
  • Improve productivity and morale.

Emphasize the organization's mission, vision, and values. Employees who understand the organization's mission, vision, and values are more likely to submit valuable suggestions that will help the organization in the furtherance of its goals. Therefore, it is important that leaders help to build a connection between the two programs.
 
Step 3: Design the Program Structure
 
After securing support from the management team, the next step is to design the program itself. When designing an employee suggestion program, employers should aim at obtaining good ideas that focus on:
 
  • Customer service;
  • Quality and continuous improvement;
  • Problem identification and removal;
  • Cost reduction; and
  • Revenue generation.
 
Establish clear rules for making suggestions. The most successful employee suggestion programs have guidelines and parameters to assist employees in making reasonable suggestions within their own area of work experience. Make sure the program:
 
  • Is easy to understand;
  • Is open and above-board in order to eliminate suspicion on how ideas are reviewed and rewarded;
  • Provides specific parameters as to what are acceptable and unacceptable suggestions;
  • Clearly explains how to submit a suggestion, including the required format and timeframe;
  • Sets a time for when all suggestions will be evaluated, such as monthly or quarterly; and
  • Communicates all other details of the program, including potential outcomes, the notification process, and rewards and recognition.
 
Assign accountability for developing, implementing, and managing the program. Experts frequently suggest assigning one person to oversee the development and management of the program with the assistance of a cross-functional team of employees from all parts and levels of the organization. In addition, it is vital to make it the responsibility of every supervisor to participate in the review, evaluation, and approval or decline of suggestions that will be implemented in his or her area.
 
Develop a submission form and process. When designing an employee suggestion form, employers should ensure that it requires the employee to provide sufficient written details about his or her idea, indicating the potential for cost savings, the expected outcome or result, and how they think the suggestion should be implemented. Though employees might not have a complete action plan for implementation, the suggestion form should at a minimum require the employee to address the why and how of the suggestion. However, employers should be sure not to make the submission process too arduous; otherwise, employees may balk at participating in the process. For ease of submission, employers may want to consider a form that can be completed and submitted online in addition to a paper form for those who do not have ready access to a computer.
 
Determine the suggestion evaluation process. Evaluating suggestions is a three-prong process. Employers need to consider:
 
  • What criteria will be used to judge each idea, such as:
    • Innovation;
    • Monetary savings;
    • Return on investment (ROI);
    • Ease of implementation;
    • Degree of improvement; and
    • Effort involved in developing the idea.
  • Who will evaluate each suggestion; and
  • The actual process for evaluating each suggestion.

Establish a coded tracking system for suggestions. To ensure the anonymity of the employee submitting an idea and to protect ideas against unintentional bias, employers should establish a coded tracking system. Substitute the code for each employee's name when suggestions are submitted to the team for review. Even ideas that may not be usable at the time of submission could have future application.
 
Establish notification timetables. Timeliness is of the essence when it comes to employee suggestion programs. Therefore, employers should acknowledge receipt of the initial suggestion within 24 to 48 hours. Notification of the decision should be in writing within 30 days thereafter or as soon as practicable.
 
Identify how to handle duplicate suggestions. To control potential duplication of ideas, each submission should be date stamped upon receipt. In case of duplication, the suggestion with the earliest date will supersede all submissions.
 
Step 4: Determine the Rewards and Recognition Portion of the Program
 
After designing the program structure, employers need to establish a system for distributing rewards and recognition. Rewards and recognition are an important part of the suggestion program and can be a key motivation in generating interest and participation. Therefore, it is important to select rewards that stimulate employee interest and are compatible with the ideas submitted.
 
Determine when suggestions are eligible or ineligible for award consideration. Employers should establish parameters surrounding what constitutes eligibility for a reward. Generally, suggestions are eligible for rewards when their implementation results in:
 
  • Cost savings or avoidance;
  • Increased revenue;
  • Safety improvement;
  • Service improvement; or
  • Operational improvement.

Suggestions are ineligible for award consideration when they can be implemented without higher approval and are deemed a regular part of the employee's job. When suggestions are deemed ineligible or unacceptable for whatever reason, employers should notify the employee in writing concerning the reason(s) behind the decision.
 
Develop an appeals process. There may be times when employees feel that their idea was not given a full review. Employers should allow employees to request reconsideration of an unfavorable determination.
 
Employees should submit their appeal in writing to the decision committee within a reasonable timeframe, e.g., 30 days, from the date of notification that their suggestion was rejected. It should outline the reasons the employee believes the decision was in error. Employers should stipulate that the appeals process is the final, binding remedy.
 
Determine the type and size of rewards. A vital element of a successful employee program is the recognition of participants for good ideas. Therefore, it is important to publicize the suggestions in addition to offering a tangible reward.
 
The type and size of rewards will naturally be dependent on the company budget as well as the benefit of the suggestion itself. The program should offer various levels of rewards.
 
Rewards might include, but are not limited to:
 
  • Honorable mention at a meeting, in the internal newsletter, or through another communication vehicle for unsuccessful participants;
  • Small giveaways, such as a T-shirt or mug, for all participants; and
  • An engraved plaque, trophy, or certificate for winning ideas in addition to:
    • Time off;
    • Gift certificate; or
    • Cash reward, such as a percentage of the savings for ideas that lead to cost savings.
 
Step 5: Roll Out the Program
 
After determining the rewards and recognition portion of the employee suggestion program, employers should then develop a plan for how they want to introduce it to employees.
 
Communicate the significance and value of the employee suggestion program to employees. Successful employee suggestion programs must be visible. After all, employees cannot participate if they are not aware of its existence. Therefore, it is important to launch the suggestion program in a highly public manner.
 
Employers should communicate the program routinely through the communication vehicles available to them, such as:
 
  • On the organization's website;
  • In the employee handbook;
  • In the internal newsletter; and
  • During new hire orientation.
A vital part of the roll-out is to ensure employees understand that the program has management's full support.
 
Continue to share the outcomes and successes of the program along the way. After introducing the new program, management must demonstrate its continuing commitment and support by routinely discussing the program and sharing the results of winning suggestions as they occur.

How Can I Deliver a Positive Employee Experience?

Pivoting from traditional people management models to a broad perspective that encompasses the entire employee experience (EX) ensures that all workers (whether on-site, fully remote or hybrid) thrive within an organization. Prioritizing EX can serve as a competitive advantage for an organization. Therefore, an employer should broaden its focus from one solely of employee engagement and, instead, prioritize the overall employee experience.

 

However, working toward an excellent employee experience is a complex proposition and touches on all business functions and workplace issues. This guide provides the steps an employer should take to focus on employees and deliver a positive employee experience.

 
Step 1: Understand the Employee Experience

The employee experience is the employee’s perceptions of the interactions they have with the organization.

 

A positive employee experience will yield increased levels of employee motivation, satisfaction and engagement as natural outcomes. If the workforce is enjoying their whole experience with the organization, then the business will benefit through higher engagement and retention. Employee engagement on the other hand, concerns how connected or committed employees are to the organization at a particular point in time.

 

A negative experience may lead to increased levels of dissatisfaction, active disengagement and turnover. As a consequence, employee experience is foundational to an organization's business outcomes and viability.

 

How an organization enables this full experience is critical and, if done well, an output of the process is engagement - enhanced engagement. However, while focusing on employee engagement and overall culture is important, it is not the complete picture. An employer must also focus on every interaction that an employee experiences during the employment relationship.

 

Step 2: Focus on Each Stage of the Employee Lifecycle

An organization should enable a full experience for an individual (from 100% on-site to 100% remote) at any point in time.
 
When approaching the employee experience, focus on "moments that matter" during each stage of the employee lifecycle as well as the core needs of employees:
 
  • What employees desire and need regarding work every day; and
  • What must be managed and delivered by employers to meet those core needs.
 
Candidate Attraction
Focus on candidate attraction methods and techniques in order to improve the employer brand for talent attraction and recognition purposes. Social media is a popular candidate-attraction method, with the majority of employers using at least one social media channel to lure applicants. Understand which platforms and online communities may attract the best candidates.
 
Other methods include:
 
  • Employee referrals;
  • Online job ads, general job boards;
  • Partnerships with secondary institutions;
  • Recruiters; and
  • Staffing agencies.
 
Ensure that a potential candidate's experience is optimized during this stage.
 
Recruitment
Recruitment is necessary to fill a gap in the employer's talent pool. Talent acquisition involves either promoting or transferring an existing employee into a different role or recruiting quality talent from the external labor market.
 
In a tight labor market, delivering the best experience to prospective employees (whether working on-site or remotely) becomes critical.
 
Areas of focus include:
 
  • Providing a recruitment experience that is compliant and fair (e.g., complying with federal, state and local laws); and
  • Ensuring a competitive total rewards package.
 
Even if a prospective employee does not enter into an employment relationship with the organization, the candidate's experience should remain a positive one.
 
Onboarding
A new hire is formally introduced into the organization through the onboarding process. The onboarding process commences before an employee's first day. Understand the importance of welcoming and clear communications. For example, the offer letter should be conditional and transparent on any additional requirements that must be satisfied prior to hiring.
 
An onboarding process should:
 
  • Implement best practices in onboarding;
  • Deliver an accurate and favorable first impression of the workplace;
  • Be an efficient and professional process;
  • Confirm that the new hire's decision to accept employment at the organization was a favorable one;
  • Provide the new hire with all of the information they need to perform their job responsibilities;
  • Comply with new hire paperwork and reporting requirements (whether at the federal, state or local levels); and
  • Begin the new hire's assimilation process into the organization.
 
The onboarding process also introduces the employee to growth opportunities and complements the organization's training and development offering.
 
Development
Training and development offerings are usually approached as role-specific or unit-specific programs. While this is a necessary approach when ensuring compliance with applicable training requirements, an employer must go further than what the law requires to remain competitive and ensure an excellent employee experience.
 
Focusing on the employee experience requires that an employer approach training and development as an individual process. Different employees develop at different levels. Taking this approach may lead to considering growth-in-role opportunities for one employee, and management training options for another. Therefore, a wide variety of learning opportunities should be offered.
 
However, communicating training and development opportunities but not providing workers the time or freedom to take the training sessions and to properly develop does not lead to an excellent experience. The corporate culture should support learning, experimentation and innovation, and allow employees to grow within their roles or through diverse career paths.
 
In addition, organizations should prioritize management training (check out the available management trainings on MyFrankCrum). Management and supervisor training and development are crucial to delivering a positive employee experience. Supervisors should be strong coaches and provide useful, consistent and contemporaneous feedback to direct reports. A focus on enabling performance should be widely adopted, thereby allowing autonomy, agency and opportunities for innovation for employees and teams.
 
Retention or Assimilation
During the stage of retention or assimilation in the employee lifecycle, employees have been fully integrated into the organization.
 
In a tight labor market, ensuring that employees have a positive experience at this stage becomes crucial: a business needs to solidify the employment relationship so that an employee is productive and works toward furthering the organization's mission and goals.
 
While an employee remains a part of the organization at this time, there is no guarantee of their satisfaction, productivity or engagement. In fact, an employee may be highly dissatisfied and actively disengaged at various times during their tenure. Changing this dynamic will improve the employee experience as well as consequent and related business outcomes.
 
Ways to improve the employee experience at this stage of the lifecycle include:
 
  • Competitive compensation and benefits, with a focus on retention programs;
  • A focus on health and wellness, whether in or out of the workplace, and the prioritization of the employee's psychological and physical safety and security at work;
  • Availability of training and coaching opportunities;
  • Meaningful feedback on performance and growth;
  • Career development and opportunities for internal mobility and promotion;
  • A favorable work/life balance;
  • Recognition of a job well done and appreciation for the employee's efforts; and
  • A trusting relationship with the organization that values fairness, diversity, and inclusion.
 
Separation
Separation from employment may occur for a host of reasons, including:
 
  • Voluntary turnover, such as resignation for personal reasons, based on a negative employee experience or for the purposes of retirement; or
  • Involuntary turnover, such as a layoff or a termination for misconduct or poor performance.
 
Focus on:
 
  • A human-centered approach to involuntary separations, with the ultimate goal of treating separating employees with care, dignity and respect; and
  • Enabling a separation process for voluntary separations that will:
    • Provide the separating employee with all of the information they need to move on;
    • Provide the employer with important qualitative data regarding the employee's experience (e.g., through an exit interview); and
    • Maintain a positive, trusting relationship with the separating employee, if possible; and
    • Create an advocate for the organization post-separation
 
Step 3: Understand and Meet Core Needs

Depending on the organization, a variety of roles or functions may be responsible for meeting aspects of the core needs of employees. Whatever the distribution of responsibility, leaders must ensure that these core needs are met in order for employees to thrive.

 

Core needs in the employee experience encompass a number of areas:

 

  • Organization. Set the overall purpose as an organization, and then:
    • Embed purpose and culture in communications;
    • Support individuals in life events (e.g., policies and practices relating to health and safety, wellness, leaves, workplace flexibility);
    • Enable employee motivation, satisfaction and engagement;
    • Innovate to ensure customer satisfaction and attainment of business goals.
  • Supervisor/management. Support workers by:
    • Listening;
    • Leading with empathy;
    • Ensuring inclusion of all as part of the team; and
    • Providing other means of support on a regular basis (e.g., impromptu check-ins).
  • Work environment. Ensure a pleasant place to work, whether on-site or a remote location and:
    • Ensure an individual has everything necessary to be productive;
    • Provide access to support (IT, reimbursement programs). Invest in tools that will enhance their day-to-day activities; and
    • Invest with a view to enhancing the future of work.
  • Team. Foster a structure that supports continued employee engagement and ensure:
    • Connection to the broader team (e.g., video calls); and
    • Frequent acknowledgment of individuals and recognition of contributions to the business.

 

Embracing an approach that prioritizes the overall employee experience (and not one that prioritizes certain employees, such as top performers or difficult-to-replace roles, over others) leads to a holistic and inclusive practice that focuses on the needs of every employee in the organization.

 

Step 4: Create Individualized Experiences

Treating an employee as their own unique person is a key component to the employee experience. Many organizations have begun focusing on employees in ways that they had only previously done with customers. (In fact, a targeted focus on individual employees will probably yield a more positive customer experience.)

 

Look to simplify and improve workplace issues. Provide processes and interactions that are seamless for employees, thereby reducing stress and frustration. Optimize points of contact with the employee (whether through applications, portals or in-person interactions). Focus on embracing a growth mindset through agile experiences so that improvements and innovations may be tracked over time.

 

Whereas experiences may be tailored for broad groups, such as accounting for general diversity or targeting employees who prefer certain workplace flexibility programs, there is also a need to tailor experiences to particular individuals.

 

In addition, ask for information and listen to employees through a variety of communication methods. For example, you can explore the following in addition to traditional feedback channels (e.g., supervisor check-ins or town hall meetings):

 

  • Candidate reaction surveys;
  • Onboarding surveys;
  • Training surveys;
  • Employee engagement surveys;
  • Pulse surveys;
  • Total rewards practices surveys; and
  • Exit interviews.

 

The focus on the individual and the importance of that relationship builds trust, which is indispensable to a positive employee experience.

 
Step 5: Review Results and Improve Processes

Focusing on the employee experience is a constant exercise. An organization needs to evaluate the success of any of the business functions and issues that contribute to the employee experience (e.g., leadership and strong management, a positive culture, trust, inclusion, policies and processes, core needs and meaningful work). When reviewing feedback and survey data, information from performance reviews, or intelligence from exit interviews, continue to keep a focus on how to improve the employee experience.

 

A focus on delivering an excellent employee experience results in positive business outcomes and allows an organization to move from simple survival in a competitive marketplace to true, lasting success. An organization that shows maturity in its approach to employee experience will continue to report favorable business and innovation outcomes.

 

How Should I Retain Employee Records?

 

Poor records management can cost an organization in two primary ways:

 

  • Failure to keep required records can result in fines or other punishments from the government; and
  • Failure to retain records of an investigation, claim, or complaint can doom a case.

 

Accordingly, most companies have detailed document retention policies and schedules that should be followed carefully. In determining proper recordkeeping procedures, the following considerations should be addressed: (i) what to keep and for how long; (ii) what needs to be kept confidential; (iii) where to store records; and (iv) how to destroy the documents that no longer need to be kept.

 

Whenever in question, the best practice is to ask counsel before destroying any document, especially if it is regarding a contentious employment decision that may lead to litigation

 

1. Make a Records Inventory

 

A record is something that an employer needs to keep for a set period of time, either for regulatory, legal, or business reasons. As a first step, it is necessary for an employer to classify what types of documents it has. The easiest way is to create a records inventory.

 

The records inventory should list the types of documents, the location of the documents, and the volume of each type of document the organization has. However, the records inventory is not a list of specific documents.

 

An inventory will help the employer keep track of records and be able to locate and manage them. The inventory should include both active documents and ones that are no longer being used but still need to be retained under the law.

 

2. Manage Personnel Files

 

Contents of the File

 

Employee personnel files must be current and complete. The types of documents that need to be in the personnel file are those relating to employment decisions, payroll, benefits, training, and performance. Information that may be requested as part of an external investigation, such as I-9 records, health and safety documents, and payroll records, should be maintained in a separate file that is easily accessible if needed. This will allow for easy retrieval and discreet handling of confidential or private information. As a best practice, I-9 records should be accessible only to HR professionals and be kept in a single separate file.

 

Certain employee documents should never be kept in the personnel file: medical records, genetic information, and investigation records (including polygraphs). These records must be kept in separate files. Documents contained in the employee's personnel file should be reviewed periodically and at least annually to ensure that everything is current, accurate, and complete.

 

While an employer should include all the documents required by law, an employer must refrain from including everything in the personnel file. Unnecessary or unsubstantiated references or criticisms of an employee's private life, political beliefs, race, sex, or religion must be avoided. A good rule of thumb: if an employer would not want a jury to see or hear it, then an employer should not include it.

 

Access to the File

 

Many states have statutory requirements that permit employees to review the contents of their personnel files. To comply with these statutes, employers should have policies or practices that allow the organization to easily locate personnel files in response to a request from the employee or an employee representative who is legally permitted to request such files, which should conform to applicable state laws.

 
3. Make a Records Schedule

 

Different laws have different requirements for how long a document must be retained. Federal laws require a minimum number of years that a record must be retained, starting from either the date the record is made, or the personnel action is taken, whichever is later. In many instances, if a claim or lawsuit has been filed, all relevant records should be kept until the final disposition of the charge or lawsuit

 

Click here for a user-friendly chart on federal recordkeeping requirements.

 

4. Store Documents

 

When reviewing how long to retain records, employers should also consider the storage format of their records. Employers should consider whether hard copies will be kept on-site or at a remote location. Documents maintained electronically may not be easily retrievable either because the storage media has deteriorated or become obsolete, or because the information was generated using a format that is no longer readable. Thus, recovery of documents may prove to be impossible or exceedingly expensive.

 

Employers should maintain information subject to federal laws, such as I-9 records, health and safety documents, and payroll records, in a convenient location for easy retrieval.

 

5. Destroy Records

 

When destroying employment-related files, employers should shred or dispose of records in an irretrievable manner, including documents collected as part of an employee background check. Employers should dispose of documents containing individual identifiers, such as Social Security numbers or bank account information, in a secure manner.

 

Employers should create written logs identifying what information was destroyed and when, including when electronically stored information was destroyed.

 

6. Keep Certain Information Confidential

 

Workplace Policies

 

Confidentiality of employee records is necessary to avoid potential liabilities from impermissible access or use of information in employee files. Employers should not only consider what employment records are being kept, but also whether certain records should be kept in separate files or maintained on a strict "need-to-know" basis.

 
Federal Laws

 

Certain federal statutes, including the ADA, FMLA, OSH Act, IRCA and GINA, require that information protected by these laws may not be disclosed generally throughout the workplace or used for reasons other than the reason the information was provided by the employee. Therefore, employers should maintain confidential information about employees, including medical information and I-9 documentation, in files that are separate from ordinary personnel files.

 

7. Minimize Potential Liability

 

Employee Disputes

 

Employers should retain and preserve employee records - including electronic records, such as emails - at the earliest possible opportunity, possibly even before a lawsuit is filed. A court may find that an employer has an obligation to identify, locate, and preserve relevant records as soon as the employer should have reasonably understood that it will face litigation.

 

When a charge is filed with an agency, such as the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the employer is required to maintain a record relating to the issues raised in the charge until the matter has been resolved.

 

Noncompete Agreements

 

If an employer is concerned that a departing employee may have violated a non-compete agreement or engaged in unfair business practices prior to leaving to join a competitor, the employer will want to ensure that the contents of the employee's mobile devices, including a laptop, hard drive, or personal digital assistant (PDA), are not erased after the employee returns this type of electronic equipment.

 

The employer's instructions regarding its efforts to locate and preserve records should be made in writing and should be retained for the purpose of demonstrating that the employer complied with its potential duty to preserve evidence.

 

For questions on record retention, please consult with your FrankAdvice HR Consultant.

 

 

How Can I Handle Mental Health Concerns in the Workplace?

 

Understanding Mental Health

Poor mental health can affect the way people think, feel and behave. In some cases, this can seriously disrupt a person's ability to cope with day-to-day life, which in turn can have an impact on their relationships, work and overall quality of life. In light of this, supervisors should keep the mental health and well-being of their employees top of mind, especially in times of immense stress and anxiety.

 

Good and poor mental health is very individual and can look quite different on different people. For example, one person's presentation of good mental health can be how poor mental health presents in another.

 

Mental health conditions can develop as a result of experiences in both a person's personal and working lives and may be caused by a series of events, both work- and nonwork-related which, when combined, can trigger or intensify poor mental health. Employees can also be affected directly or indirectly by the mental health of partners, dependents or other family members, as well as that of their friends and colleagues.

 

There is often a stigma associated with poor mental health. This fear or concern over being stigmatized may prevent people from seeking help from their employer or other sources of support. Supervisors should always be mindful of this perception because it is likely they may not always be aware that an employee may be living with a mental health issue.

 

Supervisors should also be aware that an employee's mental health condition may qualify for certain protections under federal, state and local laws. For example, a mental impairment, just like a physical impairment, may qualify as a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). An employee whose mental health condition qualifies as a disability under the ADA may be eligible for a reasonable accommodation. Also, an employee living with a mental health condition may be eligible for leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).

 

Common Mental Health Conditions

An employee's mental health condition may affect the team and the workplace as a whole in a variety of ways. It can influence not only that employee's work performance but the employee's relationships with their supervisor and coworkers. As a result, a supervisor should understand common mental health conditions, the symptoms of these conditions, and how they may affect the afflicted employee and their team.

 

Different mental health conditions can involve the same symptoms. Someone may experience the symptoms of more than one condition or be given multiple diagnoses at once. Conversely, someone may have no formal diagnosis but still find work and life difficult due to the state of their mental health or a personal situation.

 

The following are several common mental health conditions:

 

  • Depression: A person with depression will experience an unusually low mood that is long-lasting and persistent. Other symptoms can include feelings of unhappiness and hopelessness, crying, a lack of energy, low confidence, changes in weight, little or no appetite, feelings of guilt, and no longer enjoying activities that they usually do.
     
  • Anxiety: A person can experience anxiety in many different ways, but when it becomes extreme and where levels of fear and worry become severe, a range of disorders may be triggered. Some symptoms include feeling nervous, restless or tense, having a sense of impending danger, panic or doom, and having an increased heart rate.
     
  • Panic attacks: An extremely heightened state of anxiety can trigger a panic attack, which can be brought on in a matter of minutes. Intense fear or discomfort can quickly create an accelerated heart rate, sweating, trembling, shaking and breathlessness.
     
  • Obsessive compulsive disorder: A person with an obsessive-compulsive disorder has unwanted thoughts or images that continually enter their mind, causing them extreme anxiety. They develop a range of behaviors that they feel compelled to perform to ease the anxiety caused by the obsessive thoughts.
     
  • Bipolar disorder: Someone with bipolar disorder moves between periods of mania (highs) and periods of depression (lows). Highs and lows can vary in intensity and can last for days, weeks or even months.
     
  • Psychosis: A person suffering from psychosis perceives and interprets things very differently from others. The main symptoms include hallucinations (seeing and hearing things that do not exist) and delusions (having staunch beliefs in things that are not shared by others). A common delusion is that there is a conspiracy to harm them.

While it may not rise to the level of a formal diagnosis, stress is certainly a mental health concern that supervisors should be aware of, as it is one of the most prevalent issues employees face. Stressed employees may often be careless, frequently absent or tardy and tend to burn out quickly. Other symptoms include worry, anxiety, negative thinking, irregular sleeping patterns and behavioral problems.

 

The Warning Signs

Creating a personal connection with the team members is one of the most important elements of being an effective supervisor. Through regular one-to-one catch-ups with individual employees and check-ins with the team, together with their observations on how someone is generally performing, a supervisor may be able to identify potential issues early, before they develop into more serious problems.

 

Below are some of the potential early warning signs of poor mental health. However, a supervisor should not assume that an individual who displays some or all of these signs is experiencing poor mental health. It could be a sign of a different health issue or something else entirely.

 

Physical signs include:

 

  • Tiredness;
  • Aches and pains, headaches and sweats;
  • Poor sleep;
  • A feeling of being run down all the time;
  • Weight loss or gain; and/or
  • Presenting a disheveled appearance.

Emotional and psychological signs include:

 

  • Anxiousness or a feeling of distress;
  • Loss of confidence and/or motivation;
  • Mood swings;
  • Aggression and/or tearfulness;
  • A sense of feeling low and/or confused;
  • Difficulty relaxing;
  • Struggle to absorb information; and/or
  • Lapses in memory.

Behavioral signs include:

 

  • Withdrawn at work;
  • Less contribution in meetings, activities and tasks;
  • Decreased productivity;
  • Unusual hours at work - arriving early, leaving late, emailing on the weekend or when on leave; arriving late, leaving early and taking long lunches;
  • Increased absenteeism;
  • Restlessness;
  • Inconsistent performance;
  • Tendency to overreact to problems; and/or
  • Taking risks that are excessive or out of character.

The most important thing is to notice changes to an employee's typical work habits, behavior or personality; people generally do not change without reason. If an individual tends to be quiet or introverted, that may be how they feel most comfortable. However, if someone who is normally gregarious starts to withdraw from interaction with others, that is something that the supervisor should note and explore with that employee.

 

A Welcoming Place to Share

It will not always be obvious to a supervisor or even to the individuals themselves that they are suffering from poor mental health. So how does a supervisor go about ensuring that the employees on their team are doing well? The starting point is simply to ask them.

 

A supervisor can help to shape the dynamic across the team by encouraging others to speak up about their feelings and emotions, should they feel the need. A practice that a supervisor can incorporate into their regular team meetings is to have the team members check in with each other at the beginning of each meeting. As a group, go around the room and ask everyone to share what is going on for them at that moment, whether at work or home, any upcoming events - big or small - that they are worried or excited about, etc.

 

This practice will give employees an opportunity to open up and share some of the things that might be on their minds. It also gives the supervisor an opportunity to get to know their team on a slightly deeper level, giving them valuable insights into what the employees have going on and what the supervisor can do to support them. Be mindful that, depending on the team, it might be appropriate to limit sharing to work concerns and for the supervisor to check in with their team about what is going on for them outside work at individual catch-ups. Also, do not pressure employees to share personal information. Let them set the pace and share whatever information about their private lives they feel comfortable sharing.

 

The supervisor should also share - they need to lead by example. A supervisor talking honestly about their challenges can help foster a culture where employees feel more comfortable doing so themselves. Set some ground rules, though. For example, make sure that everyone is aware that this is not a therapeutic space; disclosure should be appropriate and team members should be aware that they are not there to try and solve someone else's problems.

 

Be aware that this practice will not be right for all teams or in all work environments. If the supervisor thinks that it is unlikely that employees will open up, try something else, such as smaller voluntary well-being sessions, where the supervisor and a smaller group of employees check in with one other in this way.

 

Dos and Don'ts

Don't let this practice fizzle out. Consistency is key and regular check-ins, among other things, act as a reminder that it is normal to have issues outside work and to feel sometimes overwhelmed - that's part of being human!

 

Do make sure that you follow up on anything raised during the weekly check-in if appropriate. This might involve directing the individual to professional services inside or outside the organization.

 

Do be aware that while fostering an environment where we normalize conversations around thoughts and feelings is important, some employees will be less happy to share than others. Don't force them, but perhaps think about catching up with them on a one-to-one basis.

 

Don't push employees to share in individual catch-ups either, and make sure they know they are not obliged. However, do make sure that everyone knows how to access internal and external support.

 

Considerations When Speaking to an Employee About Mental Health Concerns

Suppose the supervisor is concerned that an employee is displaying early warning signs of poor mental health. In that case, it is important that the supervisor has a conversation with the employee sooner rather than later. Timing is critical; do not wait for the individual to display serious warning signs. If the supervisor has genuine concerns, have a conversation with them before the situation deteriorates.

 

Location. Choose a quiet, private space to hold the conversation. If the individual works remotely, consider whether it is possible to hold the conversation in person.

 

Set aside enough time and be present. Ensure that there will be no interruptions during the meeting. The supervisor should not give the impression that they have little or no time for the meeting or that it is just another thing that they need to cross off their to-do list. Looking at their phone toward the end of the allotted time, rushing off to another meeting or taking a call will not demonstrate concern.

 

Be aware of nonverbal communication. A significant proportion of our communication is non-verbal through body language, facial expressions and tone of voice. It is important that the supervisor is aware of their nonverbal communication during the conversation (and when talking to their team generally), as they can strengthen or undermine their attempt to have a productive discussion.

 

Listen. The supervisor should encourage the employee to open up by assuring them that they are concerned and there to help. The supervisor must remember that they are not a medical professional and it is not their role to diagnose someone or try and solve their problems. Often people simply need to be heard.

 

The supervisor worrying that they need to solve the person's problems is very likely to get in the way of listening effectively and being a genuine source of support. Do not feel the need to fill any silences. Silence can be very powerful - the person may be thinking about the question they were just asked or absorbing what they have just said aloud.

 

Be open-minded and mindful of the language used. The supervisor may wish to mirror the language used by the employee - this should help put the employee at ease. Mirroring the other person's pace may also help to relax them. It is absolutely critical that the supervisor is not judgmental or dismissive in their manner or responses. Similarly, they should not make assumptions about the employee or their situation.

 

Be aware that people can have different experiences of the same mental health condition. For example, two people who have been diagnosed with depression may experience it differently and therefore have different needs. Focus on the individual, not their diagnosis. Take the time to summarize what was said and try reflecting back on some of those things. For example, the supervisor may say, "you said earlier that you felt devastated by what happened last week; tell me more about that."

 

Consider requests for reasonable accommodations. As stated above, a mental health condition that qualifies as a mental impairment is considered a disability under the ADA and an employee may be entitled to reasonable accommodation. A reasonable accommodation is a reasonable adjustment to a job or work environment that enables an individual with a disability to equally compete in the workplace and perform the essential duties of the position held or desired. Examples may include a modified work schedule, ability to work from home or permission to bring a service animal into the workplace.

 

Note that the request does not have to include the words "reasonable accommodation" or any other special terms. The request also does not have to be in writing. All an employee has to do is state, whether orally or in writing, that they need an adjustment or change in the work environment for a reason related to a mental impairment. A supervisor must engage in the interactive process with the employee once they are aware that an accommodation is being sought.

 

Pay attention to what the person is not saying. Are there any things that they have not mentioned that the supervisor would have expected them to? Are they avoiding certain subjects? These things may also help the supervisor build up a picture of what is going on with the employee.

 

Consider whether work is a contributing factor. During the course of the conversation, try to establish if there is anything at work that might be contributing to the individual's state of mind. Do not assume that it has nothing to do with work, even if they initially say that everything at work is fine. The supervisor may need to prod a little, with tact and sensitivity, for the employee to feel comfortable enough to disclose any work-related issues.

 

Address a reluctance to talk. Even though the supervisor may be genuinely concerned about an employee and feel ready to initiate a conversation with them, some individuals may push back or be reluctant to talk. If this happens, the supervisor should not automatically assume that they do not want to talk to anyone. They may not feel comfortable opening up to their supervisor, so consider whether they would find it easier to talk to someone else. The supervisor could ask the employee who that person might be.

 

Also consider having regular touch-points. Without being too intrusive, the supervisor should check in with the employee again, perhaps a week or so later, to let the employee know that they meant what they said and they are there for the employee, if and when they want to talk.

 

Further, an employee may see the supervisor as part of the problem. Such a view may or may not be justified and will probably make it difficult for the supervisor to help or otherwise get involved. In this situation, it is less likely that the employee will feel comfortable talking to their supervisor, so the supervisor should identify another person that the employee could speak to, such as an HR representative or someone associated with an employee assistance program (EAP).

 

Take notes after the conversation. It can be distracting for the supervisor and employee if notes are taken during the conversation, and it is likely to make it harder to establish a rapport, connect with the person or make them feel heard. Immediately after the conversation, the supervisor should take notes of what was said and ensure all internal procedures are followed.

 

Address next steps. The content of the conversation will determine what the next steps should be. If, for example, the employee said that there are no issues, but the supervisor remains worried about them, the next step may be to follow up with them in a few days, or consider whether someone else may be better suited to talk to them.

 

If the employee opened up a little but the issues do not seem that serious, or the employee is already accessing help, it may be a case of agreeing to catch up with each other in a week or so (or whatever time period the supervisor thinks appropriate) to see how things are going. The important thing here is that the supervisor keeps the dialogue ongoing.

 

A supervisor should also be flexible in their approach - the extent to which they need to monitor the situation, the level of support they need to provide and any other actions they need to take. All these steps will vary depending on the severity, nature and complexity of the circumstances. Just like physical health, mental health is fluid and can change from day to day, week to week. A supervisor will need to adapt their support to suit the evolving situation.

 

Importantly, if there are concerns about the employee's own safety or the safety of others, consider whether to speak to HR, the EAP or other individuals in the organization for support.

 

Maintain confidentiality of information provided. The ADA requires that all information collected about an employee's illness, including mental health concerns, be kept in a separate, confidential medical file and not intermingled with other personal documents. This information includes documentation relating to the employer's (and supervisor's) deliberations on issues relating to reasonable accommodations. This information should be shared with other supervisors and managers on a need-to-know basis.

 

Organizational Support

A supervisor should make employees aware of the sources of support the organization offers to those who may have concerns over their mental health. Whether by regular email communications or a wellness seminar, employees need to know that the organization takes their mental health seriously and there is assistance available.

 

Employee assistance programs. Employee assistance programs (EAPs) play a critical part in promoting the mental health of employees by offering a variety of services on a confidential basis. An employee can call an EAP and get assistance with their mental health concerns, including stress and depression, as well as substance abuse issues.

 

EAPs can also provide training to supervisors on how to effectively address behavioral problems and determine when they should recommend an EAP to an employee.

 

Health care benefits. Employer-sponsored health care benefits may be indispensable to an employee suffering from a mental health issue. Health care plans typically include coverage for mental health. Mental health and substance use disorder services, including behavioral health treatment, are considered essential health benefits.

 

Paid time off. Employees should be encouraged to take advantage of paid time off benefits that may be offered by the organization. Paid time off benefits could come in the form of vacation days, personal days and holidays. A day away from work can benefit an employee who needs a day to "unplug" or catch up on personal matters.

 

Other benefitsSupervisors should promote other benefits that the organization may offer, including discounts to gyms, skill-building courses or flexible working options. 

 

Self-Care

It is important as a supervisor to realize the role you play in influencing the behaviors of others. If the team sees their supervisor taking active steps to look after their own well-being, they are more likely to do the same. Conversely, if the reality of what employees see from their supervisor is late-night emails, weekend work or an unhealthy work-life balance, employees are less likely to feel empowered and encouraged to take steps to look after themselves.

 

Providing team members with a safe space where they feel comfortable talking about the state of their mental health is very important. However, it is equally important that the supervisor takes care of themselves and, in doing so, regularly checks their own state of mental and physical well-being.

 

 

How Do I Withdraw an Employment Offer?
 

An employer may need to withdraw an employment offer for a variety of reasons. If an employer determines an employment offer must be withdrawn, the employer should do so as early as possible, preferably before the offer has been accepted. Depending on when the employment offer is rescinded, an employer may be exposed to damages. Following the steps outlined below will help an employer withdraw an employment offer while avoiding potential legal consequences.

 

Step 1: Make the Employment Offer

The employment offer is made once the employer selects the top candidate for the position. An employment offer may be communicated verbally or in writing. Best practice dictates that offers should be made in writing to avoid any potential misunderstanding that could lead to later disputes. The employment offer should set forth the terms of employment, including start date, job responsibilities, rate of pay, work hours and whether the employment will be at-will or for a fixed duration. Employers must use caution when communicating the employment offer verbally and in writing so that they do not convert the at-will employment relationship into a contractual one.

 

During the conversation and in the written offer, employers should indicate a date by which the candidate must respond to the employment offer.

 

Step 2: Confirm Acceptance of the Offer

Acceptance of the employment offer may be in the form of a written letter or a verbal expression of intent to accept the employment offer. Generally, the applicant must take some positive action demonstrating his or her acceptance. This may include providing notice to a current employer or verbally agreeing to a start date with the new employer. Applicants may also accept the offer through a written response indicating their intention to begin work.

 

Step 3: Determine When to Withdraw an Employment Offer

Depending on when the employment offer is withdrawn, an employer may be exposed to damages. In order to limit potential exposure to damages, if an employer determines an employment offer must be withdrawn, the employer should do so before the offer has been accepted.

 

However, if an applicant has already indicated his or her acceptance to an employment offer employers may be subject to a legal claim if the offer is withdrawn. For instance, in some states, even if the employer offered at-will employment, if the applicant has accepted the offer and has relied upon the offer, such as by giving notice to a former employer or by relocating, the employer may be exposed to damages. Therefore, employers should consult with local counsel prior to making the decision to withdraw the offer.

 

Step 4: Evaluate the Reason for Withdrawing an Offer

When an applicant has already accepted the employment offer, the employer should evaluate the reason for withdrawing the offer. For instance, an employer may need to withdraw the offer as a result of a hiring freeze. However, employers must use caution when withdrawing an offer based on this reason, because if an employer knew at the time the offer was communicated to the applicant that a hiring freeze was imminent, the employer may be exposed to damages if it knowingly made a false statement that the applicant relied on to his or her detriment.

 

Employers may also consider withdrawing an employment offer if the applicant does not successfully meet the conditions for employment. Some common prerequisites of employment are:

 

  1. Background checks;
  2. Reference checks;
  3. Drug tests; and
  4. Medical tests.

However, employers must ensure that they comply with both federal and state laws before withdrawing an employment offer based on the results of a background check. For instance, the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) requires employers to notify the individual prior to taking any adverse action, i.e. withdrawing employment offer, by sending the applicant a "pre-adverse action letter." Included with this letter, the employer should give the applicant a copy of his or her report, a summary of the applicant’s rights under the FCRA, which beginning September 21, 2018 must include a notice of security freeze rights, and should notify the applicant the amount of time he or she has to dispute the contents in the report.

 

Once the employer makes the decision not to hire an applicant, based in whole or in part on the background report, and after a reasonable amount of time after the pre-adverse action letter is sent to the applicant, the employer must then supply the individual with an "adverse action notice." This notice must include the name, address and telephone number of the consumer reporting agency making the report; a statement that the reporting agency did not make the decision not to hire the applicant and cannot give specific reasons for it; and notice stating that the applicant has a right to dispute the accuracy or completeness of any information contained in the report, and can obtain another free copy of the report from the reporting agency within 60 days.

 

In addition to FCRA, employers should ensure compliance with any state notification requirements when withdrawing an offer based on a background check.

 

Further, if a background check reveals a criminal conviction, prior to withdrawing the offer, employers should consider whether the conviction is relevant to the job or there is another legitimate business reason. A blanket "no criminal record" policy is not advisable. Instead, it is best to establish a clear link between what is being screened for in the background check and the job duties. Old and non-serious convictions may have little or no bearing on an applicant's ability to do the job now. Also, some states limit the number of years a background check can span. In addition, employers should not treat arrests and convictions the same. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission warns that because an arrest is not a finding of guilt and may have a disparate impact on minorities, employers making any decision based upon an arrest should consider the nature of the job applied for, the nature and seriousness of the alleged offense and the temporal proximity between the offense and the employment application. Arrest records appear on consumer reports for a maximum of seven years. However, some states have laws preventing employers from using an applicant's arrest record for employment purposes altogether.

 

Employers may withdraw conditional job offers when the applicant has falsified the information on the job application. Reference checks provides an employer an opportunity to verify the information contained in the job application, such as the applicant's dates of employment, job title and salary. However, prior to conducting the reference check, employers should require the job applicant to sign a written waiver and release authorizing the employer to make all necessary inquiries of prior employers and any other references. Further, in order to minimize liability, employers should uniformly conduct reference checks for all similarly situated job applicants at the same stage of consideration in the hiring process.

 

With respect to drug testing, employers should be aware that drug tests may not always be accurate. As a result, employers must be able to confirm the accuracy of any drug-testing program, including chain-of-custody procedures and tampering safeguards before taking any employment actions. Further, prior to withdrawing an employment offer employers must comply with any state requirements mandating that they give an applicant an opportunity to contest the test results.

 

Preemployment medical examinations can lead to potential issues under state and federal disability laws. Employers may withdraw an offer if the reason for withdrawal is job-related and consistent with business necessity. However, employers may not withdraw an offer because an examination reveals a disability that does not prevent the applicant from working. Employers may be required to reasonably accommodate qualified individuals with a disability unless doing so would impose an undue hardship to an employer's business. The duty to accommodate extends to job applicants.

 

Step 5: Inform the Individual of the Withdrawal

Employers should notify the applicant as soon as the decision has been made to withdraw the employment offer. When notifying the applicant, employers should ensure compliance with FCRA and any state notification requirements.

 

In the event there are no specific state or federal requirements that apply to the reason for the withdrawal, as a best practice employers should communicate the withdrawn offer in writing. Employers should send such a communication with a way to track and confirm the applicant has received the communication.

 

The letter should set forth the position, the date the position was offered and the reason or cause for the offer being withdrawn. It is important that the reason for the withdrawal be placed in writing in order to avoid future disputes. Employers may want to consider using the following format:

 

[ENTER DATE]


[ENTER APPLICANT NAME]


[ENTER APPLICANT ADDRESS]


Dear [ENTER APPLICANT NAME],


On [ENTER DATE], you were offered employment with [ENTER EMPLOYER NAME] as [ENTER POSITION TITLE].


This letter serves to notify you that your employment offer with [ENTER EMPLOYER NAME] is withdrawn as a result of [ENTER REASON].


Sincerely,


[ENTER SIGNATURE]


[ENTER TITLE]

 

Reach out to your FrankAdvice HR Consultant for guidance as needed.

 

What about the union activity in the news lately?
What should I do if labor starts to organize in my workplace?
 

Union drives at a popular coffee chain have been in the headlines and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is expected to expand worker protections in 2022. Unionization was 6.1% of the private sector in 2021, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLR). The unionization of public sector workers, 33.9%, was more than five times the private sector.

 

A high level of employee satisfaction and good communication are important tactics to remain union-free. If there are signs of union activity in the workplace, such as employees talking about a union or employee rights, off-site meetings or other changes in employee behavior, an employer generally has the right to engage in lawful efforts to resist unionization. An employer is allowed to provide employees with information and can convey that it hopes employees will refrain from signing a union card till they have all the facts. Share information about the competitive pay and benefits provided by the company and emphasize the practices that make the organization a great place to work. An employer can tell employees why it feels a union is not needed.

 

If an employer is faced with a petition for union representation, it should respond quickly to comply with legal deadlines and if it opposes unionization, to conduct an effective union avoidance campaign. It is advised to consult with legal counsel.

 

Use the steps below to help determine how to respond to a union's petition to unionize a group of employees in the workplace and to prepare for a secret ballot union representation election conducted by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB). Employers should complete the following steps in sequential order.

 
Respond to a Union Representation Petition
 
1. Review the Notice of Petition for Election and Related Forms
  • Review the Certification of Representative Petition (NLRB Form 502 (RC)) and the Description of Representation Case Procedures (NLRB Form 4812) served by the union.
  • Confirm whether the NLRB has determined that the petition and showing of interest are sufficient.
  • Review the Notice of Representation Hearing and other forms and note the dates set for filing the required Statement of Position and for the pre-election hearing.
  • Review and evaluate the information in the union's petition regarding the makeup of the proposed bargaining unit and determine whether any of the details should be disputed.
    • Identify and document any issues to raise during the pre-election hearing.
    • Consider whether to enter into an election consent agreement with the union and avoid the pre-election hearing.
  • File a request to postpone the pre-election hearing, if needed, and serve a copy of the request to all parties.
    • Be aware that a hearing may be postponed for a length of postponement determined to be appropriate by the regional director.
    • Include a request for an extension for the Statement of Position due date, if needed.

2. Post and Distribute the Notice of Petition for Election to Employees

  • Post the Notice of Petition for Election in conspicuous places and where notices to employees are customarily posted within five business days after receiving it.
  • Distribute the Notice of Petition for Election electronically if this method is customarily used to communicate with employees.
  • Maintain the posting of the Notice of Petition for Election until the petition is dismissed or withdrawn or it is replaced by a Notice of Election.

3. File the Statement of Position and Voter List

  • Within eight business days after service of the petition, file a Statement of Position (NLRB Form 505) with the NLRB setting forth any basis for objecting to the election.
  • If the proposed bargaining unit is being challenged:
    • Provide the classifications, locations or other employee groupings that must be added to or excluded from the proposed unit to make it an appropriate unit.
    • Provide an alphabetized list of the full names, work locations, shifts and job classifications of all employees in the proposed unit.

4. Participate in the Pre-Election Hearing

  • If there was no election consent agreement, attend the pre-election hearing to litigate those issues that are necessary to determine whether it is appropriate to conduct an election:
    • Introduce evidence to support the employer objections.
    • Call, examine and cross-examine witnesses.
    • Make oral arguments on the record at the close of the hearing.
    • File any post-hearing brief within five business days after close of the hearing.

5. Review the Direction of Election

  • If an election is ordered, review the Direction of Election and Notice of Election for details as to the:
    • Type of voting;
    • Eligibility period; and
    • Date(s), time(s) and location(s) of the election.

6. Submit the Final Voter List

  • Within two business days after the issuance of the Direction of Election or the approval of an election agreement, electronically provide a final voter list to the NLRB Regional Director and the union.
  • Include in the voter list each eligible voter's:
    • Full name;
    • Work location;
    • Shifts;
    • Job classification; and
    • Contact information (including home addresses, available personal email addresses and available home and personal cell telephone numbers).
  • Include in a separate section of the voter list the same information for individuals who will be permitted to vote subject to challenge based on the parties' agreement or the direction of election.

7. Post and Distribute the Notice of Election to Employees

  • Within five business days after approval of an election agreement or the issuance of the Notice of Election, post the Notice of Election in conspicuous places and where notices to employees are customarily posted.
  • Post the Notice at least three full working days (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays) prior to 12:01 a.m. on the day of the election.
  • Distribute the Notice of Election electronically if this method is customarily used to communicate with employees.

8. Conduct a Campaign to Persuade Employees to Vote Against Unionization

  • Hold meetings with employees to educate the employees of the realities, risks and costs of unionization.
  • Post informational notices explaining the reasons against voting for a union on bulletin boards and intranet sites and convey the message in emails and letters sent to employees at their homes.
  • Provide managers and supervisors with lawful talking points and answers for employees who ask questions.
  • Remind managers and supervisors to avoid threats, interrogations, promises or surveillance.

9. Participate in the Secret Ballot Election

  • Inspect the polling place and the voting eligibility list.
  • Arrange to have one or two observers present to challenge ineligible voters.
  • Determine whether there was any conduct by the union or employees that affected the result of the election and file any objections within seven days of the election ballot tally.
  • If the final tally of ballots shows the majority of the eligible employees voted in favor of union representation, consider the union to have won the election.

Tips

The best way to avoid having to respond to a union representation petition is to prepare and implement a union-avoidance strategy before a union organizing attempt is made. Employees who feel aggrieved are more likely to sign union authorization cards.

 

If a union obtains signed authorization cards from at least 30 percent of the employees in its targeted group of voters (i.e., a showing of interest), it may file a signed petition for representation with the NLRB. A proactive union-avoidance strategy is designed to foster good employer-employee relations and includes:

 

  • Adopting a union avoidance policy and a distribution and solicitation policy;
  • Training managers and supervisors to recognize signs of a union organizing campaign and reviewing regularly their rights and obligations;
  • Establishing clear communication channels and a workplace environment that provides fair, consistent and respectful treatment of employees; and
  • Providing channels for employees to address their concerns.

An employer has a statutory right to tell its employees that it opposes unions and to give its side of the argument through mandatory meetings and the distribution of information. However, it is important to understand what can and cannot be said in order to comply with federal laws dealing with union election campaigns.

 

Warnings

Exercise caution before agreeing to a union's demand for recognition without a secret ballot election when presented with a showing of interest of more than 50 percent of employees in the proposed bargaining unit. Employees who are not persuaded into unionizing may sign cards just to get the union organizer to stop bothering them, believing they have not made a commitment.

 

An employer or supervisors should not examine any signed authorization cards presented to them. When more than 50 percent of employees in the union's targeted voting group have signed cards, examination of the cards might forfeit an employer's right to a secret ballot election.

 

If the employer fails to post or distribute the Notice of Petition for Election, the election may be set aside and decided in the union's favor.

 

 

What is an Employee Referral Program?

An employee referral program is a recruiting strategy in which employers encourage their employees to refer qualified candidates for jobs in the company. A key principle behind an employee referral program is that your employees can help with good applicants for your organization. Instead of just using traditional hiring methods, such as job boards, you can ask your employees for help. Encourage them to share job openings to their network and offer a reward if their referral is hired.

 

While you should be using a variety of recruiting methods, consider some of the benefits that can come with implementing an employee referral program.

 

1. Greater Employment Brand Opportunity

Employees can be the company’s greatest advocates—and the more they talk, the better. The majority of job seekers consider the employer’s brand and reputation before applying for a position.

 

These programs also encourage current employees to think about the positives of working for your firm and then go about spreading the word to their network. Even when the employee doesn’t have a specific person in mind, the right incentive can result in social media posts and other forms of sharing on a large scale.

 

2. Improved Quality of Hire

When employees refer their family or friends, they are likely recommending people who carry the qualities required to succeed with your firm. Current employees understand their referral’s strengths and weaknesses. They know the referral’s performance will reflect on them.

 

Your current employees may mentor the preferred candidate throughout the hiring process. While this may seem like an unfair advantage, it is actually beneficial for all. For instance, the new hire will already be familiar with the responsibilities and expectations of the organization even before the required onboarding. 

 

3. Help With Company Culture

“Culture” is a big buzzword in the business world for a good reason. Organizations with rich company culture typically have lower turnover. What’s better, a solid positive corporate culture generates happier and more productive workers.

 

Strong company culture isn’t easy to foster. Luckily, your employees already understand these values and will refer contacts they think are the right fit. This means you are more likely to end up with applicants who understand and share your organization’s values. Additionally, having a friend (s) at work tends to lead to higher levels of employee job satisfaction and retention.

 

 

A well-designed employee referral program helps with recruitment and with retention. The program should not be too complicated to use. Determine the process, participation rules, and appropriate rewards for participation. A typical reward is a bonus payment, but options also include items such as a gift card or an extra day off. You can show recognition in the company newsletter or a company meeting.

 

Review your program on a frequent basis. Analyze the quality of hires, the retention rate of new hires that were referred, as well as workplace participation in the employee referral program. If workforce diversity is negatively affected by the program, it may need to be re-evaluated.

 

Many businesses can find the hiring process quite challenging. By leveraging a well-optimized employee referral program, you can reduce some of that stress. Finding suitable candidates gets a little easier. Offering a seamless interview and onboarding process for new hires and rewarding your employees for referrals will also boost employee engagement levels across the board. As a result, workers may be more loyal to your organization.

 

You can reach out to your FrankAdvice HR Consultant for guidance.

 

 

Do I have to show my employee their personnel file?
Federal law does not govern the right to access personnel files; that is governed by state law. Some state laws provide employees with the right to have access to their own personnel files not only while employed, but after termination of employment as well, until the applicable statute of limitations runs out on any possible legal claims. While employers should check with their state laws to determine specific guidelines and requirements, some employers may wish to allow employees access to their personnel files in order to build a level of trust and openness that is important in the workplace. Additionally, employers should have a well-written policy regarding the actual process for accessing personnel files, if such access is required or desired. This allows the employer to control the circumstances of when, how and where employees view their personnel files without compromising policy or state law.

 

The following chart indicates whether an employee in each state has the right to inspect or copy the employee's personnel file. Click to download the chart here.

 

For questions on how to handle a request for access to an employee personnel file reach out to your FrankAdvice HR Consultant.

 

 

What are Best Practices for Performance Appraisals?

Every employer will have a different approach toward performance appraisals, also known as performance reviews or evaluations. Some employers use them solely as an evaluation tool to record performance, track progress and determine compensation. Others use it for employee development, motivation and retention. They consider it as part of an ongoing dialogue between an employee and his or her supervisor. Other employers view it as both - a review tool and a development tool.

 

Performance appraisals should reflect the organization's business goals and values and take into account the types of behavior the employer would like to encourage among its employees.

 

Performance appraisals are used in a variety of HR decisions, such as compensation, promotion, and termination. This is especially true of termination decisions. A well-crafted evaluation can help stave off a discrimination claim, whereas a sloppy or incomplete one could help the employee make his or her case against the employer.

 

General Guidelines for Appraisals

Regardless of why an employer gives performance evaluations, it should follow general guidelines for developing the appraisal and delivering it.

 

  • Timing. The employer should decide on the best timing for the organization. Appraisals can be annual, biannual, quarterly, on the employee's anniversary or mid-year.
  • Consistency. The appraisal should be based on uniform, job-related criteria.
  • Regular Documentation. The most effective performance appraisals review a constant, documented conversation with employees about performance and goals.
  • Clarity of Expectations. Employees need clarity with respect to job duties and performance expectations. Clarity starts with the job description, which should be as accurate as possible with respect to the duties, tasks and level of performance necessary to do the job. The performance appraisal is an extension of those expectations.
  • Supervisor Bias. Precautions must be taken to avoid supervisor bias. The employer should develop a system to monitor for stereotypical thinking and bias in reviews and train supervisors not to be biased in their reviews.
  • Grievances. The reviewer should consider whether any grievances or claims have been filed by the employee. The supervisor needs to be especially careful if any legal issues could arise from the review.
  • Self-Appraisals. The employer may consider using a self-appraisal in which the employee answers questions or rates themselves as part of the review process.
  • Accommodations. The reviewer should take into consideration whether an employee may need accommodations for the appraisal meeting, e.g., if hearing or sight impaired. Also, a poor performing employee may need job duties accommodated if a disability contributes to the poor performance.
  • Compensation. The employer may consider separating the performance appraisal meeting from the discussion on compensation. Separating the issues allows the performance appraisal meeting to be focused on the employee's performance and future goals.
  • Goals. The supervisor should set new goals for the coming year with the employee in the appraisal meeting.
  • Confidentiality. The employer should maintain the confidentiality of documentation and discussions relating to employee performance. The supervisor's discussions about employee performance, improvement plans and compensation should be limited to those with a need to know only. Confidentiality helps ensure the integrity of the process and leads to greater trust by employees. However, the employer should keep in mind that employees do not have the same obligations of confidentiality with respect to performance reviews. Not only may employees discuss their opinions of performance reviews or other terms of employment, but they may be protected in doing so by federal law.
  • Employee Acknowledgment. The employee should have the right to review the appraisal and comment on it. The employee should sign a copy of the review. Generally, following an organization's protocol, a copy of the review is given to the employee; a copy kept by the supervisor; and a copy sent to HR.
  • Employer Liability. In addition to discrimination, retaliation and harassment concerns, the employer should consider any potential liabilities under state laws, such as libel, slander, invasion of privacy and defamation.
  • Handbook. The employee handbook should have a section on appraisals that clearly communicates the appraisal process to employees.
 
Emphasizing Consistency Among Supervisors

The employer should ensure that all supervisors conduct employee performance appraisals consistently. Consistency lends credibility and fairness to the performance appraisal process. When employees believe in the fairness of the process, they are more likely to take it seriously. In addition, when employees view the process as fair, complaints of discrimination, retaliation and harassment relating to the appraisal process are likely reduced.

 

Consistency can be achieved through the use of uniform criteria for evaluating performance. These criteria should be valid, job related and be a reliable measure of the skills and level of performance necessary for the job in question. These should reflect conduct and performance on the job, and not personality traits. Using this type of criteria will keep the review from becoming a personal attack.

 

The criteria that are developed for any particular job category should be uniform with respect to all employees in the same job category. Uniform criteria should also be created for employees across the organization who may be in different job categories but who share the same goals, such as achieving the organization's mission or following safety requirements.

 
Selecting the Process for Review
An employer may select from a number of different methods to assess employee performance. Many employers use a list of performance categories and performance ratings or criteria. Others provide broad-based categories and ask the supervisor to describe the objective criteria that apply to the assessment of the performance. Some employers ask employees to complete a self-appraisal form before the supervisor reviews an employee's performance.

 

There exist a number of evaluation systems.

 

  • Rating Scales and Checklists. These are a list of numbered categories that correspond to different levels of performance - for example, "meets, fails to meet, or exceeds expectations." Rating scales leave little room for subjectivity, but they tend to limit the amount of feedback available.
  • Management by Objectives (MBO). Under this format, the supervisor and employee agree upon the specific objectives that the employee is to obtain within a defined time frame.
  • Employee Self-Appraisal. A self-appraisal resembles the form used by the employee's supervisor in evaluating performance and is intended to generate honest feedback from the employee about his or her achievement of goals, areas of weakness and potential for development. One drawback of this method is that many employees find it very difficult to complete a self-appraisal and end up overstating or understating their accomplishments.
  • 360 Degree Feedback. This method aims to evaluate subjective criteria, such as an employee's strengths and weaknesses, leadership abilities, character and workplace behavior and is intended to provide a complete picture of an employee's abilities in addition to job performance and specific skill set. Information is gathered from a variety of sources, including the employee's supervisor, peers, sometimes direct reports, and sometimes even customers or clients the employee deals with on a regular basis.
  • The Negotiated Performance Appraisal. Used mainly as a coaching tool, this method uses lists prepared by both the employee and the supervisor about the employee's responsibilities, strengths and weaknesses.

 

Making the Appraisal Meaningful
The supervisor must be honest and candid. It is not helpful to the employee or to the organization to give a favorable review if the employee is actually underperforming. It is a natural tendency for supervisors to say that employees are performing better than they actually are. The supervisor looks good if his or her team is highly-rated.
 
However, supervisors must be willing to have the tough conversation and say to an employee that his or her work is good but not great and, most importantly, that there are some specific things that could be improved.
 
Another tendency a supervisor should avoid is to focus on the most recent work of the employee. The supervisor should take care not to allow outstanding or unsatisfactory work completed immediately prior to the review to offset an entire year's performance.
 
Finally, the supervisor should focus on each individual's performance and avoid rating all employees, or groups of employees, the same.

 

Creating an Effective Form

An appraisal should use a simple, though complete, form to document the appraisal conversation between the supervisor and the employee.

 

A form should include the following sections.

 

  • Performance Categories. The form should set forth the performance rating categories, such as outstanding, exceeds, meets, needs improvement and unsatisfactory. Alternatively, it can use a number system.
  • Talents or Skills to Be Measured. There are a variety of choices for this section. Selection should be made based on the job description. Some possibilities include:
     
    • Technical or job knowledge;
    • Work quality;
    • Attendance and punctuality;
    • Problem solving;
    • Conflict resolution;
    • Decision-making;
    • Planning;
    • Organization;
    • Dependability;
    • Productivity;
    • Ability to meet deadlines;
    • Interpersonal skills;
    • Verbal communication;
    • Written communication;
    • Ethics;
    • Initiative;
    • Teamwork;
    • Adherence to policy;
    • Cooperation; and

  • Prior Goals. Goals from the previous evaluation are listed and rated.
  • Accomplishments. This section should list any accomplishments the employee made during the year.
  • Performance Summary. This section gives an overall summary of how the employee performed.
  • New Goals. In this section, the supervisor identifies any relevant goals that were not met from the previous year and adds new goals for the employee to achieve in the coming year.
  • Acknowledgement. The appraisal form should always have the employee acknowledge receipt of the appraisal and provide room for any employee comments.
Communicating the Results

Once the appraisal has been completed, the next step is to consider how to communicate the results to the employee.

 

The supervisor should take several things into consideration.

 

  • Location. The performance appraisal meeting should be held in a quiet, private location away from the general workforce, if possible. The meeting should be scheduled in advance, and both the employee and supervisor should confirm the date and time by email or other means. Enough time should be put aside for full discussion of the issues.
  • Accommodations. The supervisor should provide a reasonable accommodation to an employee with a known disability who needs one in order to review the performance appraisal or to participate meaningfully in the performance review meeting;
  • Collaboration. The appraisal meeting should be an interactive and collaborative process in which both the employee and supervisor have a chance to prepare in advance and to speak at the meeting. The supervisor should let the employee offer ideas on how to resolve performance problems. Allowing the employee to play an active role in the meeting leads to a more productive process; and
  • Set the Tone Early. The supervisor should open the meeting with a positive statement to set a good tone for the meeting. This is especially true if the performance review will be negative. He or she should maintain eye contact with the employee and give the employee the opportunity to talk about successes, failures, issues he or she is having; and roadblocks. However, the supervisor should maintain control of the meeting as a performance review, and not let it become a gripe session. If issues are brought up that warrant further discussion, an appointment to discuss those at another time should be made.

 

Appraisal Checklist

To assure a quality appraisal process, the employer should:

 

  • Provide clear instructions to those conducting the reviews;
  • Emphasize consistency and monitor for uniform rating standards;
  • Identify the job description and performance standards and communicate these to the employee in performance-planning sessions;
  • Set forth all goals that will be assessed and always add new goals;
  • Protect against possible bias with multilevel review of the appraisal;
  • Provide a comment section for the employee being reviewed;
  • Provide an appeal process for poor evaluations; and
  • Consider giving employees a copy of the appraisal before the meeting so they may have their initial emotional response in private, and have time to prepare their response.

How Do I Handle a Religious Accommodation Request?

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) prohibits an employer from treating an employee or applicant unfavorably based on the individual's religious beliefs, and requires an employer to reasonably accommodate an individual's sincerely held religious beliefs, if such an accommodation does not impose an undue hardship on the employer.

 

Key Steps

  • Employer receives a request for an accommodation that may be religious in nature.
  • Are the employee's beliefs sincerely held?
  • Engage in and document the interactive process.
  • Does an accommodation create an undue hardship for the employer?

 

Request for Accommodation

More employers are requiring employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19, and there has been an uptick in requests from employees for religious exemptions. Religion is not limited to wider known religions of Christianity, Judaism, and Islam. It may also include generally recognized belief systems and also personal beliefs.

 

Sincere Religious Beliefs

To determine whether an employee's objection is based on religious beliefs, you can review the following:

 

  • During a discussion about the objection, did the employee continually talk about politics?
  • Does the employee's main concern appear to be distrust of the vaccines?
  • Does the employee's main concern appear to be that mandatory vaccination is an infringement on their freedom?
  • Can the employee reasonably put into words why he or she believes that vaccination is wrong as it relates to their religious beliefs?
  • Are there any facts about this employee that lead you to believe that their religious beliefs are not sincere? (the default should be to accept the employee's beliefs as sincere.)

It helps to know your employees. Does their history indicate that they really do have sincere religious beliefs? Does the supervisor know that the employee goes to worship services? Does the supervisor know they make fun of co-workers who have personal faith? Did the employee recently obtain their belief system after the company announced their vaccine mandate? This knowledge won’t determine every “sincere religious belief” question but can help.

 

Interactive Process

Have the employee explain the religious basis for their objection to COVID-19 vaccination. It can help to get a written narrative. Be mindful of reproduced forms from the internet, but there may also be employees who use internet forms because the forms best express their thoughts. Letters from religious leaders can be helpful as additional supporting information (i.e. priests, rabbis or imams) but don't rule out an employee's sincere belief just because the employee is unable to provide one.

 

If the explanation supports the request for religious accommodation then accept it as a valid request and go on to the next step of determining whether you can accommodate without undue hardship. If the explanation clearly does not support the religious accommodation request, (for example, it shows the employee is afraid of vaccine side effects), then you can deny the request. It may be a legitimate reason to oppose vaccination but it is not religious.

 

Document the reasons for denials and approvals of requests for religious accommodation. The documentation should include the employee's request, any supporting information given, the reason you determined that the request was or was not "religious" or “sincere”, and any other information that might be helpful in case there is a legal challenge.

 

Undue Hardship

An employer should consider all possible alternatives to determine whether exempting an employee from a vaccination requirement would impose an undue hardship.  Employers may rely on CDC recommendations when deciding whether an effective accommodation is available that would not pose an undue hardship.

 

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has weighed in with technical assistance that answers some workplace vaccination questions. Employers that encourage or require vaccinations must comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and other workplace laws. Federal, state and local laws may differ so an employer should consult with legal counsel when appropriate.

 

Reach out to your FrankAdvice HR Consultant as needed.

 

How Do I Handle an Employee Who Commits or Is Charged With a Crime?

 

Handling an employee who has been charged with or convicted of a crime can be challenging for an employer. Unlike many other HR issues, it is generally not appropriate to handle each arrest or conviction in the same manner. Factors employers must consider when determining how or even whether to implement corrective action for an employee who has been charged with or committed a crime include:

 

  • Whether the alleged criminal conduct occurred on the employer's premises or during working hours;
  • Whether the alleged crime is related to the employer's business interests;
  • Whether the alleged crime violates the employer's ethical standards or impacts the employer's reputation; and
  • Whether the employee has been convicted of the crime or merely has been charged.

Employers should be aware that employment decisions may not be based solely on an employee's, or prospective employee's, arrest record. Similarly, even criminal convictions cannot be the basis for an adverse employment action (which includes failure to hire, termination, or corrective action) unless the employer can show that the action is justified by business necessity. The employer may demonstrate business necessity by showing that the employee's conduct was egregious or that the conduct was related to the employee's job.

 

Step 1: Determine Whether A Collective Bargaining Agreement Applies

A collective bargaining agreement may address the arrest or conviction of employees and describe a process for handling these matters. However, not all collective bargaining agreements cover such situations. If an employee has been charged or convicted of a crime, the first step should be to determine whether the employee is working under a collective bargaining agreement and, if so, whether that agreement sets forth a procedure for handling the incident. Employers should strictly adhere to the provisions of the collective bargaining agreement when considering employment actions against unionized employees.

 

Step 2: Document Notice of Behavior

Employers should note in the employee's personnel file the way that the employer discovered the employee's alleged criminal conduct. This may be a contact from law enforcement, a media report, an incident report from a supervisor, a complaint from a co-worker, a hypothetical situation posed by an employee, or an anonymous email tip, if there is sufficient specificity to indicate that the scenario described may be true. In some cases, the employee may report the incident. Any such notice is cause for an investigation into the reported incident.

 

Step 3: Refer to Written Conduct Policies

When an employer receives notice that an employee may have committed a crime, the employer should review its written policies to determine whether the alleged conduct violates any policies or employee work rules. If so, the investigation into the incident should focus on the violation rather than any possible criminality. Similarly, if the employer subsequently takes corrective action against the employee, that action should be tied to a violation of the rule or policy.

 

Step 4: Conduct a Thorough Investigation

Employers should investigate any report of criminal activity by employees. The process should be fair and consistent but can vary according to the needs of the employer and the nature of the incident. Although there are no formal requirements for such investigations, employers should give the accused employee an opportunity to present their side of the story.

 

In addition, the investigation can involve interviewing witnesses and reviewing any documentary evidence, including police reports and videotapes. In some circumstances, it may be appropriate to engage in a physical search of the employee's personal effects or the employee's work area, but note that this is only permissible if the employee has notice that there is no reasonable expectation of privacy in the circumstances. In searching an employee's personal items, the employer should ask the employee to open or empty them. However, the employer should not do it unless their policy expressly allows it. If the employee refuses, the employer can make it a condition of future employment.

 

Step 5: Discern Site of the Crime

If a crime, or alleged crime, occurred on the employer's premises, the employer has considerable authority to take corrective action. Private-sector employers need not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that an employee engaged in criminal conduct to take action. If the alleged criminal conduct occurred on the premises, a reasonable investigation shows that the employee engaged in the conduct, and the conduct violates the employer's work rules, the employer may take corrective action that is unrelated to whether or not the employee is ever convicted of a crime as a result of the conduct.

 

Step 6: Learn Whether the Incident Occurred During Employee's Working Hours

The employer's investigation also should focus on when the alleged criminal activity occurred. If an employee allegedly committed criminal conduct during working hours, and the conduct violated workplace rules, the employer may implement corrective action for the violation without regard to whether the employee is ever convicted of a crime.

 

Step 7: Determine Whether the Conduct Occurred During the Course of Business

If employees engage in criminal behavior while performing their duties, the employer may be liable for the criminal conduct. For example, an employer may be liable for an employee's vehicular homicide if it occurred while the employee was driving a company car on a sales call. Similarly, an employer could be liable for a bouncer's assault in the course of ejecting a patron from a nightclub, and so on. In a circumstance where the employer may be liable for the employee's conduct, the employer has greater freedom to impose corrective action against the employee.

 

Step 8: Take Action in Accordance With Written Procedures

If the employer's investigation reveals that the employee's alleged criminal action took place on the premises during the employee's regular work time, the employer may take corrective action against the employee in accordance with the employer's formal corrective action procedures. For example, if an employee is accused of stealing money from the pocketbooks of co-workers during working hours, and the investigation finds evidence that the employee committed the thefts, the employer may take action against the employee in accordance with its corrective action procedures without the need for an arrest or criminal conviction.

 

Similarly, the employer may take corrective action against an employee for conduct that occurs off the employer's premises or outside of normal working hours if the alleged criminal behavior occurred in the course of the employee's work-related duties. For example, if an employee injures a pedestrian while speeding on the way to a job site in a company car, the employer may be justified in imposing corrective action against the employee for reckless use of the employer's vehicle.

 

Step 9: Determine Whether Off-Duty Criminal Conduct Is Job-Related

Employers have less justification for implementing corrective action on employees for alleged criminal behavior that occurs off the employer's premises, outside of working hours, and not in the scope of performing work-related duties. In order to take action in those cases, the employer must demonstrate some relationship between the action the employee is accused of and the employee's work. For example, a television network executive's conviction for trespassing at his ex-wife's home would generally not be an incident that would justify employer corrective action if the incident occurred outside working hours. However, if an accountant were convicted of embezzling funds from her church, the employer would be justified in taking action to protect its interests, as the crime has some relation to the employee's duties.

 

Note, however, that arrest alone is insufficient to justify corrective action for alleged criminal behavior that does not take place on business premises, during working hours, or during the course of the employee's duties. In the case of the accountant, once the employer received notice of the arrest, the employer would need to conduct an investigation and offer the employee an opportunity to explain the circumstances before taking final corrective action. However, the employer may be justified in reassigning the employee to a position that does not involve access to funds until the criminal matter is resolved.

 

Step 10: Decide Whether Off-Duty Criminal Conduct Is Egregious

An employer also may take corrective action against an employee for criminal behavior unrelated to work, if the conduct is egregious and would have a deleterious impact on the employer's business or reputation. Examples of egregious actions are violent crimes, crimes with weapons, and exploitive or repugnant crimes such as possessing child pornography.

 

Step 11: Consider Other Bases for Action

The circumstances surrounding an employee's arrest or conviction may sometimes provide a basis for taking corrective action even if the conduct was unrelated to work, not egregious, and had no relationship to the employee's job. For example, an assembly line worker who is arrested for non-payment of alimony may not be able to post bond and so may be gone from work for several days with an unexcused absence. In that case, the employer may take corrective action on the basis of the excused absences. However, the employer must ensure that all employees with unexcused absences are treated uniformly; the fact that incarceration was the reason for the employee's absence must not be a factor in the corrective action.

 

Step 12: Document Everything

As with all personnel matters, documentation is critical. The employee file should contain all relevant notes, documents, evidence, interviews, and decision-making processes pertaining to the decision to impose corrective action on the employee for the alleged criminal activity.

 

Reach out to your FrankAdvice HR Consultant as needed.

 

How Do We Address COVID-19 Vaccination Conflicts in the Workplace?

COVID-19's impact on the workplace continues. As vaccines are made more widely available, employers are faced with new considerations and concerns, including how employees' differing opinions on the coronavirus vaccine could result in conflicts in the workplace. Regardless of your organization's position on COVID-19 vaccinations, it is good to have a plan in place to address concerns and conflicts that may arise surrounding this controversial topic.
 
Just as employees are likely to have different beliefs and perceptions, the same is true regarding COVID-19 vaccinations. With such strong differences of opinion and the various information that people are exposed to via social media and other sources, conflict can happen.
 
Don't wait until a problem arises to help supervisors and managers learn to recognize and deal with situations that are not only disruptive, but also pose significant compliance risk to the organization. Preparing now is the key to minimizing the potential for conflicts in the future.
 
Fortunately, there are steps an employer can take to prepare for and respond to vaccine-related employee conflict.
 
Step 1: Prepare Supervisors to Defuse Conflict
Provide supervisors with resources they can use to recognize and effectively deal with conflict that may arise between employees regarding different perceptions of COVID-19 vaccines. This can include a combination of coaching, resources, as well as individualized support as needed. For example:
 
  • Remind supervisors that they must set an appropriate example by refraining from engaging in judgmental conversations with employees on the topic of COVID-19 prevention practices, including vaccinations.
  • Encourage supervisors to make an effort to be visible to their team at this time so that they can quickly become aware of any conflicts related to COVID-19 that may arise.
  • Ensure that supervisors know to intervene quickly if they become aware of employees arguing about vaccinations, just as they would with any workplace conflict.
  • Explain that some circumstances related to vaccinations have employment law compliance implications (e.g. disability and religious accommodations).
  • If there are issues among team members, suggest that the supervisor meet with the team to emphasize the importance of staying focused on work and keeping opinions on personal healthcare decisions out of workplace discussions.
  • Remind supervisors they are accountable for stopping any communication that is disruptive to the work environment.
  • Reassure supervisors that they can always reach out for support or coaching on situations that they are unsure how to handle.

Step 2: Talking Points for Supervisors
To help prepare supervisors to address conflicts related to COVID-19 vaccines here are a few suggestions:
 
  • If employees are arguing about vaccines, redirect them. Stop and say something like, "Look, everyone has their own ideas on this topic. That's not why we're here. We're at work, so that's where our focus should be. How are things going with …?"
  • If employees engage in name-calling (anti-vaxxer, sheep, etc.), instruct them to stop and refocus on work. Advise them that such communication is unprofessional and/or a violation of the code of conduct. Follow corrective action procedures and document the incident as you would any other similar violation.
  • For those who disruptively promote their perceptions to others, counsel individually. Explain that what they are doing is disruptive and that they are coming across as attempting to force their beliefs on others, which is it is not permissible in the workplace. Take appropriate action.
Note: The key is to encourage supervisors to look at the problem behaviors and determine what workplace policies or practices these behaviors violate.  They will then be better able to keep emotion out of their handling of the situation.
 
Step 3: Provide Resources for Supervisors and Employees
Resources include:
 
  • You can include a page on the company intranet with basic facts as well as continued COVID-19 safety precautions for your workplace.
  • You can make available your company’s official COVID-19 vaccination policy, if you have one. It is advisable to consult legal counsel regarding the best course of action for your organization’s needs.
  • You can provide ways for employees to get more information from official sources, such as links to the websites of federal, state, or local health authorities.
Note: Do not include or refer employees to editorialized information on the topic. It should be a neutral fact-based source of information that is kept current as COVID-19 developments arise.
 
Step 4: Remember Additional Considerations
Requiring COVID-19 Vaccinations
 
The current position of the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is that employers may opt to require their employees to get the COVID-19 vaccine. However, be aware that employees may request exemptions/accommodations under federal law (e.g., Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII)), as well as state and local law. For example:
 
  • Disability - Under the ADA, if an employee has a disability or medical condition that would contraindicate the vaccine, the employer may have to accommodate by exempting the individual from a mandatory vaccine requirement. For example, this could apply to someone who has a history of allergic reactions to a vaccine ingredient.
  • Sincerely Held Religious Beliefs - Employers may also have to exempt employees who are unable to receive a COVID-19 vaccine because of sincerely held religious beliefs, observance or practice. However, social, political or economic philosophies, as well as mere personal preferences, are not protected as religious beliefs under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
Once aware of a request for an exemption, engage in the interactive process with the employee and consider whether there are any reasonable accommodations that would either eliminate or reduce the health risks to the employee and others. Be aware that an employer may not be required to provide an accommodation if doing so would create an undue hardship (i.e., significant expense or difficulty to the employer's businesses operations under current circumstances).
 
Encouraging COVID-19 Vaccinations
 
Encouraging employees to get a COVID-19 vaccination is an alternative for employers that do not want to go as far as requiring it. Employers may wish to implement such a policy and include incentives for employees to get vaccinated.
 
For example, you can encourage employees to get vaccinated by compensating them for the time they spend getting vaccinated as if they were working during that time. However, if providing incentives, make sure there is an alternate path to earning the incentives for employees who cannot get vaccinated due to disability or sincerely held religious beliefs.
 
Preventing Workplace Harassment and Discrimination
 
Prevent hostile environment harassment by efficiently addressing workplace conflicts related to COVID-19 vaccines. As with supervisors, employees must be made aware that workplace policies addressing harassment and discrimination cover hostile employee interactions over COVID-19 vaccinations.
 
As mentioned above, take appropriate measures and document a COVID-19-related argument if it rises to a level that is considered a violation of workplace discrimination and harassment policies. Be sure to treat each incident consistently and uniformly so as not to give rise to allegations of favoritism or unfair treatment.
 

 

Which Employee Behaviors May Be Legally Protected?

Federal and state laws may confer certain rights or benefits on workers that protect them from adverse employment actions, such as corrective actions or discharge, for certain behaviors that employers may perceive as misconduct. Therefore, employers should use caution when considering appropriate steps. The following circumstances should be taken into account when deciding whether to reprimand an employee for certain conduct, depending on state and local laws.

 

Off-Duty Activities

Employers may regulate employee behavior at after-work events, such as holiday parties, or during work travel. However, certain off-duty behaviors, such as smoking, may be protected in certain states.

 

Employers should be prepared to show a legitimate business justification for any work rule that regulates off-duty behavior.

 

Political Activities

An employer may want to set ground rules for displays of a political nature, such as signage or buttons, in a workspace. However, an employer must use caution before enforcing work rules that limit an employee's political activities, such as canvassing, voting or engaging in political speech. Protections relating to political activities vary by state.

 

Absences Due to Protected Leaves

Employers may take corrective action measures for abuse of leave, job abandonment and falsification of documentation, among other violations. However, employers need to be mindful of discrimination and retaliation concerns with employees who may have taken a legally protected leave. For example, strict enforcement of no-fault attendance policies may violate federal and state disability discrimination laws.

 

Volunteer or Emergency Services Activities

Generally, moonlighting may be regulated by employers. However, certain volunteer community activities may be protected by particular state antidiscrimination statutes. In addition, employers should consider allowing these types of employee activities in order to encourage organizational community involvement.

 

School-Related Activities

Employment laws in certain states protect parents' rights to attend school conferences, meetings or events. Employers also may wish to allow these types of employee activities in order to encourage community involvement and promote a work-life balance.

 

Gun or Firearm Possession on Employer Property

Generally, an employer may prevent employees from bringing guns onto its private property. However, several states protect employees who transport firearms in their locked vehicles.

Depending on the specific state's requirements, employers may only restrict firearms possession within the workplace itself, and not the adjoining parking lots. Alternatively, employers may provide an additional parking area for employees transporting guns in their vehicles.

 

In any event, employers should continue to protect the workplace from threats of violence and enforce internal security measures.

 

Garnishment or Bankruptcy Proceeding

Employers should use caution in taking adverse action against employees based on their personal financial problems. Under certain circumstances, employers may not reprimand employees for their debts. Federal laws (including the Consumer Protection Act, Bankruptcy Act and the Fair Credit Reporting Act) and various state laws protect employees for the mere filing of a bankruptcy petition or for legal actions arising from a single debt.

 

Pending Criminal Proceedings or Previous Arrests

Employers should be prepared to show a business necessity when reprimanding employees for pending criminal proceedings. For example, a bank may be able to show business necessity when utilizing corrective action with an employee for a crime involving theft, because the criminal conduct is related to the employee's job. In addition, states may restrict corrective actions for mere arrests or for pending actions that have not resulted in convictions.

 

Filing a Complaint, Requesting a Benefit or Testifying in a Proceeding

Employers should use caution with employees based on filing a claim or complaint or testifying in a proceeding. Federal and state laws contain retaliation and whistleblower protections for employees who engage in protected activities. The number of legally protected activities vary widely from state to state.

 

Key federal statutes that include anti-retaliation provisions include: Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; Fair Labor Standards Act; National Labor Relations Act; and Americans with Disabilities Act.

 

Employees may not be disciplined because they engaged in protected activities, but such employees are not entitled to more lenient corrective action procedures if they have engaged in misconduct.

 

Membership in a Protected Class

Employers may not take adverse action against employees based on a protected characteristic, such as race, color, religion, disability, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity or genetic information. Numerous federal and state laws define protected classes. State laws often add to the federally protected categories to include marital status or military status.

 

Although certain employees enjoy protections against corrective action based on their protected characteristics, employees may be subject to corrective action for misbehavior or misconduct despite belonging to a protected class.

 

The above is not an exhaustive list. Reach out to your FrankAdvice HR Consultant for guidance.

 

What is the best way to interview an applicant?

Behavioral interviewing is an important interview strategy that gets an employer away from asking typical “yes” and “no” questions, which reflect how the applicant performed and behaved at a past job.

 

The most accurate predictor of future performance is past performance in similar situations. Behavioral interviewing focuses on an applicant’s past experiences by asking applicants to provide specific examples of how they have demonstrated certain behaviors, knowledge, skills, and abilities. The answer to these questions provides an employer insight into the applicant’s thought process in answering questions and can also trigger red flags. This straightforward approach limits the amount of discretion for each individual interviewer, making it easier for the employer to evaluate and compare applicants fairly. Thus, not only is this method effective for making a hiring decision, but it can also be crucial in defending against allegations of discrimination in hiring and selection.

One of the most common ways to accomplish this is using the STAR method.

 

  • Situation: Tell me about a time...
  • Task: Where you didn’t agree with something your manager told you to do.
  • Action: What did you do to resolve it?
  • Results: How did it turn out? What did you learn from this experience?

There are many behavioral interviewing questions. Below are a few samples with various follow-up questions.

1. Give me an example of a time when you tried to accomplish something, and it failed or didn’t go as planned.

  • What challenges did you come across?
  • What was the outcome?
  • How did you feel about the outcome?
  • What did you learn from the experience?

 

  1. Tell me about a time when you were extremely upset with a coworker or your supervisor.
  • What happened?
  • What was the outcome?
  • How do you feel about the outcome?
  • Would you do anything differently to prevent this from happening in the future?

 

  1. Tell me about an ethical situation you have encountered at work.
  • What challenges did you come across?
  • What was the outcome?
  • What did you learn from the experience?

These questions and the answers that follow provide important insight into the mind, thinking process, and past behavior of an applicant. The best predictor of future behavior is what has occurred in the past. The answer to these questions can trigger red flags or warning signs of someone that may not be the best hire for your organization. For additional information, check out MyFrankCrum, My Resources, HR Resources for an Interview Guide, and other resources.

 

Can I ask my employees if they have been vaccinated?

 

The short answer is yes. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has indicated in their guidance that it is generally permissible for employers to ask employees about COVID-19 vaccination status.

 

There may be reasons why employers want or need to know which employees have been vaccinated. For example, to aid in return to the office from remote work planning or to administer a leave program for vaccination. Employers are permitted to ask employees if they have been vaccinated and to ask employees for documentation. Most vaccine providers provide documentation relating to the shot, and this should be readily available to the employee. 

 

One area of caution, however: employers should avoid digging too deep into other health inquiries to not run into conflict with other employment laws relating to discrimination and disability.  For example, if an employee states their health provider has instructed them against getting vaccinated, management should not ask why the employee cannot receive the vaccine or ask questions regarding the employee’s underlying health condition.

 

Likewise, the employer should remind employees not to provide vaccination documentation that contains the vaccine recipient’s personal medical information. Once the employee provides the documentation, it should be stored in a secure location, separate and apart from the employee file, similar to other medical records.

 

While you may ask employees if they have been vaccinated, asking about why they have not been vaccinated may elicit information about medical status so you should only ask that question if it is “job-related and consistent with business necessity”. Per the EEOC, you meet that standard if you have a reasonable belief, based on objective evidence, that an employee who is not vaccinated would pose a direct threat to the health and safety of others or themselves. This is a tough hurdle to clear.

 

Decide if you need to know workers’ vaccination status and which company representative is responsible for this request for information. As we have seen with other issues related to COVID-19, many vaccination scenarios will require consideration of various factors. Reach out to your FrankAdvice HR Consultant for guidance as needed.